Katz' ADL index assessed functional performance of Turkish, Moroccan, and Dutch elderly

Abstract

Background and Objective

We examined the reliability and validity of self-reported limitations encountered in the activities of daily living (ADL) as measure of functional performance, for Turkish, Moroccan, and indigenous Dutch elderly in the Netherlands.

Methods

We obtained data on self-reported ADL measured by Katz' ADL index and on five related health outcomes among a general population sample of 304 Dutch, 330 Turkish, and 299 Moroccan respondents aged 55–74 years, in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (response: 60%).

Results

Katz' ADL index demonstrated good internal consistencies for each ethnic group (Cronbach's alphas: 0.84–0.94). Regarding validity, the ADL index showed relatively strong associations with related outcomes, that is, long-term limitations in mobility and SF-36 physical functioning (rank correlations: 0.64 and −0.60, respectively). Associations with more general health outcomes, number of chronic disorders, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale symptoms, and SF-36 role performance were weaker, as expected. Associations were stronger for Moroccans than for indigenous Dutch elderly regarding both SF-36 outcomes and depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Katz' ADL index is valid to assess functional performance of Turkish, Moroccan, and Dutch elderly, but comparisons with Moroccan elderly should be handled with caution. The explanation of these findings and their generalizability to other ethnic groups deserve further study.

Introduction

Health problems among older immigrants from nonindustrialized countries are a rapidly increasing challenge for public health in most industrialized countries. Due to political and economic developments, the numbers of immigrants are growing [1], [2]. Moreover, when compared to the indigenous population, rates of health problems such as cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and mental health disorders are high among immigrant groups and are likely to further increase because of the aging of these groups [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Explanatory factors may be poor working conditions [2], [3], lack of physical activity [6], and difficulty in adapting to the new cultural environment which, in turn, hampers access to care [7]. Such health problems often lead to long-term functional limitations and high needs for health care [8], [9], [10], [11].

In the Netherlands, immigrants from Turkey and Morocco constitute major groups. In 2004, 2.2% of the Dutch population was of Turkish descent (i.e., at least one parent born in Turkey), and 1.9% of Moroccan descent; in the main Dutch cities, their share is much higher (http://statline.cbs.nl, accessed March 2, 2005). They came to the Netherlands as labor migrants in the 1960s and early 1970s, firstly only men on a temporary basis. However, most of them stayed and their families were subsequently reunited with them. Both groups are rather homogenous culturally, almost entirely of Islamic background [12], and relatively young. However, the cultural distance to indigenous Dutch is somewhat smaller for Turkish immigrants than for Moroccan immigrants. The latter are rated less favorable by indigenous Dutch than Turkish immigrants (36 vs. 43 on a rating scale from 0, least favorable, to 100, most favorable) [13]. Moreover, Turkish immigrants have instituted relatively more organizations than Moroccans [14]. For instance, in the city of Amsterdam, the number of organizations per 1,000 immigrants is almost twice as high for Turkish immigrants (5.6) compared to Moroccan immigrants, and the same applies for voter turnout (39% vs. 23%) [15]. Finally, Turkey has a relatively long history of a formal separation between religion and state that also exists in the Netherlands, whereas in Morocco the king still has a number of religious tasks [14].

The health status of both immigrant groups has been shown to be poorer than that of indigenous Dutch [3], [4], [5]. For instance, long-term limitations measured by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) indicator [16] occurred much more frequently among first-generation Turkish and Moroccan immigrants aged 16–64 years than among indigenous Dutch in the same age group (odds ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 13.1 (8.2–20.9), and 8.2 (5.4–12.3), respectively) [4].

Self-reported limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) are often used to assess functional performance, both in research and in daily care and mostly measured by the ADL index of Katz et al. [17]. This index was first tested among patients in hospitals, where clinicians rated patients' ability to perform six tasks. Nowadays, the index is commonly used to measure the functional status of community dwelling, noninstitutionalized, elderly individuals, either in its original set-up or with adaptations, and also as a self-report measure instead of an assessment tool for clinicians.

Despite the frequent use of the Katz' index, evidence on its reliability and validity is limited [18], [19], [20], [21]. Evidence on its cross-cultural validity lacks even though the index and its various adaptations have been used to compare ethnic groups [8], [11], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. This is especially questionable when people with a very different cultural background are to be compared.

A first question to be answered in this case is whether data that are acquired with an instrument are equivalent across ethnic groups. Herdman et al. provided a model to assess this equivalence, starting from the assumption that constructs to be measured are not automatically the same across cultures [28]. Though they described this model in conjunction with the measurement of health-related quality of life, it may be also applied to the measurement of ADL. The model of Herdman et al. consists of six types of equivalence, which can logically be applied one after the other: conceptual; item; semantic; operational; measurement; and functional equivalence [28]. The first two types refer to whether domains are of importance for the target cultures, and whether items to measure these domains are similarly relevant across cultures. Semantic equivalence concerns the similar meaning of the translation of these items. Operational equivalence concerns the (similar) appropriateness of measurement methods in the various cultures, which should lead to equivalent measurements in terms of instrument behavior. Cultural equivalence regarding these five aspects should then lead to a full functional equivalence of an instrument.

The aim of this study is to examine the reliability and validity of self-reported limitations in ADL among Turkish and Moroccan elderly, when compared to indigenous Dutch elderly. As such, it provides new evidence on the operational and measurement equivalence of Katz' ADL index, but was based on the available evidence regarding the hierarchically lower types of equivalence.