Mechanical coupling between transverse plane pelvis and thorax rotations during gait is higher in people with low back pain
Introduction
Human movement is inherently variable, and in gait no two strides are identical. The average movement over many strides is generally interpreted to reflect the planned movement, with every stride showing some degree of unplanned variability with respect to the planned trajectory. Planned movements between pelvis and thorax in the transverse plane are affected in people with more severe low back pain (LBP). For instance, a higher coherence and altered temporal relationship between pelvis and thorax rotations in the transverse plane have been reported (Lamoth et al., 2002a, Lamoth et al., 2002b, Lamoth et al., 2006, Selles et al., 2001). These changes have been suggested to reflect tighter control of transverse plane trunk motions aimed at avoiding large and fast rotations (Wu et al., 2008). However, as smaller deviations from planned trunk movement are likely to be less controlled, they could be perceived as threatening. People with less severe LBP could then aim to minimize unplanned trunk movements while leaving the planned trunk movements intact.
It has been suggested that people with LBP alter trunk stiffness and damping to avoid unplanned movements between pelvis and thorax (trunk movements) (van Dieen et al., 2003) and there is some support for this notion. In a semi seated position, higher trunk stiffness was found in people with recurrent LBP in the sagittal plane, but damping was lower (Hodges et al., 2009). Moreover, activation patterns of superficial trunk muscles in people with chronic LBP during walking appear consistent with splinting or guarding behavior (Arendt-Nielsen et al., 1996, Lamoth et al., 2006, van der Hulst et al., 2010). Such activation patterns during walking suggest increased stiffness or damping. However, it remains unknown whether or not these activation patterns lead to the avoidance of unplanned trunk movements.
In principle, variability of motion between two moving segments can be reduced by increased stiffness and/or damping (Gribble et al., 2003, Selen et al., 2005, Van Gemmert and Van Galen, 1997). Stiffness and damping could act as a filter to attenuate the amplitude of the variability at frequencies around the main component of motion, without affecting the main component itself. Stiffness and damping differentially attenuate different frequencies of movement variability. Stiffness would attenuate movement variability mainly at lower frequencies, while damping would affect movement variability mainly at higher frequencies.
The analysis was limited to the transverse plane, in view of the previous findings on changes in planned movements in this plane (Lamoth et al., 2002a, Lamoth et al., 2002b, Selles et al., 2001, Wu et al., 2002). Furthermore, movement amplitudes during gait are largest in this plane, especially when considered in relation to the anatomical range of motion, which potentially makes it more desirable to strictly control movement in this plane. We therefore hypothesized that people with chronic LBP would attenuate unplanned trunk movements in the transverse plane more compared to pain free controls during gait at different speeds. Effective attenuation of trunk stride-to-stride variability would require the variability in pelvis and thorax movements to occur at a similar point in time and with equal amplitudes. We therefore hypothesized (1) that correlations between movement variability of pelvis and thorax would be higher; (2) that the amplitude of trunk (=thorax−pelvis) variability would be lower in people with chronic LBP compared to pain free controls. Spectral analysis of movement variability was used to determine the frequencies at which trunk variability was attenuated, and thereafter used to infer the contribution of trunk stiffness and damping to the attenuation of unplanned trunk movements.
Section snippets
Participants
Thirteen volunteers (8 female, 5 male, 35.3±12.4 years, 72.3±13.4 kg, 1.75±0.13 m) with chronic LBP (duration: 60 (3–420) months median (range)) were recruited via exercise therapists from the greater Amsterdam region. Twelve healthy volunteers (8 female, 4 male, 32.2±13.1 years, 75.3±11.2 kg, 1.72±0.10 m) without current LBP, and no history of LBP that had required treatment within the previous three years were recruited from the local community by word of mouth. Participants were excluded if
Results
There were no differences between the groups in any of the demographic parameters (sex, age, weight and height, independent t-tests, all P>0.52). The LBP participants reported a pain intensity of 29.2±14.8 mm (range 6–53 mm) on the 100 mm visual analog scale at the beginning of the experiment. There was a trend for a slower preferred walking speed in the LBP participants, 1.11±0.36 m/s compared to 1.33±0.25 m/s for the pain free controls (independent t-test; P=0.07). Two LBP participants were unable
Discussion
We investigated transverse plane motion of the pelvis, thorax and trunk in people with chronic LBP and pain free controls. Our results shows that the amplitude of trunk stride-to-stride variability (relative motion between pelvis and thorax) is significantly lower in the LBP group, whereas the amplitude of pelvis and thorax stride-to-stride variability separately was similar between groups. A lower amplitude of trunk stride-to-stride variability can only occur if the stride-to-stride variations
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Dutch organization for Scientific Research, the Dutch Association for Exercise Therapy Mensendieck (NVOM) and the Mensendieck Development Foundation (SOM). Paul Hodges is supported by a Senior Principal Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. We thank Inge Spoor, Mark Scheper, Hu Hai and Hamid Fallah Yakhdani for their help in data collection.
References (21)
- et al.
The influence of low back pain on muscle activity and coordination during gait: a clinical and experimental study
Pain
(1996) - et al.
A framework for the analysis of mixed time series/point process data—theory and application to the study of physiological tremor, single motor unit discharges and electromyograms
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
(1995) - et al.
Changes in the mechanical properties of the trunk in low back pain may be associated with recurrence
Journal of Biomechanics
(2009) - et al.
Pelvis–thorax coordination in the transverse plane during gait
Gait & Posture
(2002) - et al.
Active trunk stiffness increases with co-contraction
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
(2006) - et al.
Oblique abdominal muscle activity in response to external perturbations when pushing a cart
Journal of Biomechanics
(2010) - et al.
Changes in walking pattern caused by the possibility of a tripping reaction
Gait & Posture
(2001) - et al.
Disorders in trunk rotation during walking in patients with low back pain: a dynamical systems approach
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
(2001) - et al.
Lumbar and abdominal muscle activity during walking in subjects with chronic low back pain: support of the “guarding” hypothesis?
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
(2010) - et al.
Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
(2003)
Cited by (101)
Biomechanical factors associated with non-specific low back pain in adults: A systematic review
2023, Physical Therapy in SportCitation Excerpt :All significant results were reported in Table 6. Spatio-temporal parameters were examined in five (Jiménez-Del-Barrio et al., 2019; Lamoth et al., 2008; Rum et al., 2021; Van denHoorn et al., 2012 ; Zahraee et al., 2014) out of the 26 studies. Lamoth et al. (2008) found that LBP patients had a slower walking speed and smaller stride length compared to healthy controls.
Limited evidence of altered gait parameters in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain
2023, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :The findings in the present study may also suggest a potential link between the variation of gait parameters and level of pain. It is well accepted that tight control strategy featured by reduced variability of movement in people with low back pain may reflect a protective reaction to avoid pain [24]. There is evidence that people with moderate low back pain showed less variability of stride length [17].
Do people with low back pain walk differently? A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Journal of Sport and Health ScienceCitation Excerpt :The mean difference in relative phase between groups was 25%. This finding was supported by three out of four additional studies from which data could not be pooled.33,87,88,90 Multiple studies also investigated the stride-to-stride variability of inter-segmental coordination in the axial plane during steady-state gait,33,66,87,89–91 with 3 reporting less variability in individuals with LBP.87,89,90