Research
Original Research
Nutrient Profiles of Vegetarian and Nonvegetarian Dietary Patterns

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.06.349Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Differences in nutrient profiles between vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns reflect nutritional differences that can contribute to the development of disease.

Objective

Our aim was to compare nutrient intakes between dietary patterns characterized by consumption or exclusion of meat and dairy products.

Design

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 71,751 subjects (mean age=59 years) from the Adventist Health Study 2. Data were collected between 2002 and 2007. Participants completed a 204-item validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Dietary patterns compared were nonvegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco vegetarian, lacto-ovo vegetarian, and strict vegetarian. Analysis of covariance was used to analyze differences in nutrient intakes by dietary patterns and was adjusted for age, sex, and race. Body mass index and other relevant demographic data were reported and compared by dietary pattern using χ2 tests and analysis of variance.

Results

Many nutrient intakes varied significantly between dietary patterns. Nonvegetarians had the lowest intakes of plant proteins, fiber, beta carotene, and magnesium compared with those following vegetarian dietary patterns, and the highest intakes of saturated, trans, arachidonic, and docosahexaenoic fatty acids. The lower tails of some nutrient distributions in strict vegetarians suggested inadequate intakes by a portion of the subjects. Energy intake was similar among dietary patterns at close to 2,000 kcal/day, with the exception of semi-vegetarians, who had an intake of 1,707 kcal/day. Mean body mass index was highest in nonvegetarians (mean=28.7 [standard deviation=6.4]) and lowest in strict vegetarians (mean=24.0 [standard deviation=4.8]).

Conclusions

Nutrient profiles varied markedly among dietary patterns that were defined by meat and dairy intakes. These differences are of interest in the etiology of obesity and chronic diseases.

Section snippets

Methods

The analyses are based on cross-sectional data obtained between 2002 and 2007 from a 50-page self-administered questionnaire.10 The number of subjects in the present analysis included 71,751 US and Canadian participants from the AHS-2 cohort whose dietary data had been released for analysis.10 The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Race and ethnicity were stratified

Results

Basic demographic information is reported in Table 1. Significant differences by dietary pattern were seen for all variables. Across all dietary patterns, 30- to 55-year-olds comprised the largest group (P<0.001). The proportions of men among semi- or strict vegetarian were 3 percentage points higher than in nonvegetarians. The nonvegetarians and pesco vegetarian groups had relatively high proportions of black subjects (29.4% and 31.6%, respectively) compared with 24.3% overall.

Across dietary

Discussion

The present study found that mean nutrient intakes often differed greatly across dietary groups. Contrasts were usually strongest between strict vegetarians and nonvegetarians. Previous studies have shown that plant-based dietary patterns or diets restricted in animal products are associated with both lower cardiometabolic risk and lower coronary heart disease event rates.4, 17, 18, 19 These findings might be related to the sizeable differences in nutrient composition between the dietary

Conclusions

The present study provides new data on dietary intakes in a large population. Dietary patterns defined by intakes of animal-derived foods are associated with large differences in nutrient, vitamin, and mineral intakes in this large study population. These dietary patterns identify strongly contrasting groups of subjects. Associations between diet patterns and health outcomes, perhaps partially mediated by the markedly different dietary intakes and BMI values, are of interest and invite

N. S. Rizzo is an assistant professor, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, and is also associated with the Unit of Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

References (32)

  • B.M. Popkin

    Global nutrition dynamics: The world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2006)
  • N.S. Rizzo et al.

    Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome: The Adventist Health Study 2

    Diabetes Care

    (2011)
  • A. Vang et al.

    Meats, processed meats, obesity, weight gain and occurrence of diabetes among adults: Findings from Adventist Health Studies

    Ann Nutr Metab

    (2008)
  • S. Tonstad et al.

    Type of vegetarian diet, body weight, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2009)
  • M.L. Toohey et al.

    Cardiovascular disease risk factors are lower in African-American vegans compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarians

    J Am Coll Nutr

    (1998)
  • G.E. Fraser et al.

    Risk factors for all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality in the oldest-old. The Adventist Health Study

    Arch Intern Med

    (1997)
  • Cited by (253)

    • Impact of the vegan diet on health

      2023, Medecine des Maladies Metaboliques
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    N. S. Rizzo is an assistant professor, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, and is also associated with the Unit of Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

    K. Jaceldo-Siegl is an assistant professor, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.

    J. Sabate is a professor, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.

    G. E. Fraser is a professor, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.

    STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

    FUNDING/SUPPORT This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant 1R01-CA-94594 and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Grant 2010-38938-2092.

    View full text