The relationship between mental health literacy, personal contacts and personal stigma against depression

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate and compare the percentages of personal stigma by levels of depression literacy and exposure to persons with depression, overall and by gender.

Methods

Data were collected in a probability sampled population-based survey of 3047 adults in Alberta, Canada. Measures included a 9-item depression stigma scale. Personal stigma was examined using bi-variate analyses and logistic regression modeling separately for men and women.

Results

Over 45% of participants considered that people with depression were unpredictable. Over 20% reported that people with depression were dangerous. However, the percentages did not differ by levels of depression literacy and whether having a family/friend with depression. Multivariate analyses showed that the associations between depression case recognition, agreement with health professionals about treatment, personal contact with depression and stigma varied by gender.

Limitations

This was a cross-sectional survey which relied on self-report. Therefore, causal inferences could not be made. The findings may be affected by recall and reporting biases. The results could not provide definitive evidence about whether improving mental health literacy and personal contact with depression could reduce stigma.

Conclusions

In the highly educated population, the attitudes of considering individuals with depression as being unpredictable and dangerous were prevalent. Educational campaigns may have some positive effects on stigma against depression, but should be carefully designed and pay attention on the target populations.

Introduction

Population-based epidemiological studies showed that the annual prevalence of major depression in the United States and Canada was 6.6% and 4.8%, respectively (Kessler et al., 2003, Patten et al., 2006). Although depressive disorders are prevalent, there is a paucity of studies investigating stigma against depression. Research on stigma of mental disorders has revealed three types of stigma, namely self-stigma, personal stigma and perceived stigma. Different types of stigma may be correlated and all three should be the targets of anti-stigma campaigns. In this study, we focused on personal stigma against depression. Personal stigma is an individual's personal attitudes towards the person with mental illness (Griffiths et al., 2006).

To reduce stigma against mental illness, there may be many strategies, including education programs raising awareness about mental illness, improving mental health literacy and promoting contact with persons with mental illness (Rusch et al., 2005). However, based on research of stigma related to schizophrenia, researchers cautioned that large-scale population educational campaigns may not be effective because subpopulations may hold different stigmatizing attitudes (Stuart and Arboleda-Flôrez, 2001, Thompson et al., 2002). Angermeyer and Matschinger's study suggested that recognizing major depression depicted in a case vignette had no effect on public attitudes towards people with major depression (Angermeyer and Matschinger, 2003). In terms of contact with a person with depression, Angermeyer et al. found that those who were familiar with mental illness (either undergoing psychiatric treatment themselves or having someone in the family undergoing psychiatric treatment) expressed less desire for social distance from someone with major depression than those without any personal experience (Angermeyer et al., 2004).

Social distance and depression stigma have been measured by dimensional scales (Link et al., 1987, Griffiths et al., 2006). Due to lack of a clear cut-off, studies using a dimensional social distance scale often report mean scores and perform multivariate linear regression analysis. However, the beta coefficients in linear regression are mathematical values and may not reflect an important change from clinical and public health perspectives. In addition to the methodological issue, we have limited knowledge about how mental health literacy and contact with a person with depression affect stigma related depression. Therefore, we conducted this analysis to (1) estimate and compare the percentages of various personal stigmatizing attitudes by levels of depression literacy and exposure to persons with depression, and (2) investigate whether depression literacy interact with exposure to persons with depression in relation to personal stigma by gender.