New research
Amygdala Functional Connectivity Is Associated With Emotion Regulation and Amygdala Reactivity in 4- to 6-Year-Olds

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.01.024Get rights and content

Objective

Emotion dysregulation has been suggested to be a potent risk factor for multiple psychiatric conditions. Altered amygdala−prefrontal cortex (PFC) connectivity has been consistently linked to emotion dysregulation. Recent data indicate that amygdala−PFC functional connectivity undergoes a prolonged period of development, with amygdala reactivity during early childhood potentially shaping this unfolding process. Little is known about the relationships between amygdala−PFC functional connectivity, amygdala reactivity, and emotion regulation during early childhood. This information is likely critical for understanding early emotion dysregulation as a transdiagnostic risk factor for psychopathology. The current study examined the relationships between amygdala functional connectivity, amygdala reactivity, and emotion regulation in preschoolers.

Method

A total of 66 medication-naive 4- to 6-year-olds participated in a study where resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and parent-reported child emotion regulation ability data were collected. fMRI data collected during a face viewing task was also available for 24 children.

Results

Right amygdala−medial PFC (mPFC) functional connectivity was positively associated with child emotion regulation ability and negatively associated with child negative affect and right amygdala reactivity to facial expressions of emotion. Right amygdala−mPFC functional connectivity also statistically mediated the relationship between heightened right amygdala reactivity and elevated child negative affect.

Conclusion

Study findings suggest that amygdala−mPFC functional connectivity during early childhood, and its relationships with amygdala reactivity and emotion regulation during this highly sensitive developmental period, may play an important role in early emotional development. These results inform the neurodevelopmental biology of emotion regulation and its potential relationship with risk for psychopathology.

Section snippets

Participants

Children 4 to 6 years old were recruited from pediatrician’s offices, daycare centers, and other community resources throughout the greater St. Louis area. To increase sample variance in depressive symptoms, caregivers endorsing items suggestive of “low” (≤1 items) or “high” (≥3 items) risk for mood-related difficulties on the Preschool Feelings Checklist24 (PFChecklist) were contacted and invited to complete additional phone screening steps regarding their preschoolers. The presence of

Demographic and Child Characteristics

Child demographic, emotion regulation, and negative affect characteristics and maternal depression scores are summarized in Table 1. When compared based on acquisition group (ie, 2.5-second versus 2-second [s] TR), ERC Negativity (2.5s = 27; 2s = 24.7) and Emotion Regulation (2.5s = 26; 2s = 26.9) did not differ between groups. However, the 2.5s TR group was slightly younger (63.6 [10.3] months) than the 2s TR group (68.5 [8.6] months; t = −2.1, p = .04). Average relative FD was not associated

Discussion

The current study used fMRI to investigate the relationships between amygdala connectivity, amygdala reactivity, and emotion regulation in preschoolers. Consistent with predictions, we found that right amygdala−mPFC functional connectivity was positively associated with emotion regulation in preschoolers. We also found that right amygdala−mPFC connectivity was negatively related to right amygdala reactivity and negative affect. Importantly, in our smaller subsample, amygdala−mPFC connectivity

References (50)

  • S.B. Perlman et al.

    Developing connections for affective regulation: age-related changes in emotional brain connectivity

    J Exp Child Psychol

    (2011)
  • L.J. Gabard-Durnam et al.

    The development of human amygdala functional connectivity at rest from 4 to 23 years: a cross-sectional study

    Neuroimage

    (2014)
  • D.S. Grayson et al.

    Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: a guide to the neuroimaging literature

    Neuroimage

    (2017)
  • J. Luby et al.

    The preschool feelings checklist: a brief and sensitive screening measure for depression in young children

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • S.S. Ghosh et al.

    Evaluating the validity of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration for developmental cognitive neuroscience studies in children 4 to 11 years of age

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • J.D. Power et al.

    Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • A.K. Roy et al.

    Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • M.D. Shen et al.

    Functional connectivity of the amygdala is disrupted in preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • L.J. Gabard-Durnam et al.

    Human amygdala functional network development: a cross-sectional study from 3 months to 5 years of age

    Dev Cogn Neurosci

    (2018)
  • P. Vidal-Ribas et al.

    The status of irritability in psychiatry: a conceptual and quantitative review

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • S.G. Costafreda et al.

    Predictors of amygdala activation during the processing of emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of 385 PET and fMRI studies

    Brain Res Rev

    (2008)
  • R. Ciric et al.

    Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity

    Neuroimage

    (2017)
  • L. Parkes et al.

    An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI

    Neuroimage

    (2018)
  • P.M. Cole et al.

    Emotion dysregulation as a risk factor for psychopathology

  • P.M. Cole et al.

    Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: methodological challenges and directions for child development research

    Child Dev

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    The Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation (M.S.G.), the Communities Healing Adolescent Depression and Suicide (CHADS) Coalition for Mental Health (J.L.L., D.M.B.), and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; M.S.G.; K23 MH098176) provided funding for this study. Dr. Gaffrey’s work on this manuscript was supported by a grant from the NIMH (R01 MH110488).

    Author Contributions

    Conceptualization: Gaffrey, Barch, Luby, Petersen

    Data curation: Gaffrey

    Formal analysis: Gaffrey

    Funding acquisition: Gaffrey, Barch, Luby

    Investigation: Gaffrey

    Methodology: Gaffrey, Barch, Petersen

    Project administration: Gaffrey

    Resources: Gaffrey

    Software: Petersen

    Visualization: Gaffrey

    Writing – original draft: Gaffrey

    Writing – review and editing: Gaffrey, Barch, Luby, Petersen

    ORCID

    Michael S. Gaffrey, PhD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-1079

    Deanna M. Barch, PhD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-8506

    Joan L. Luby, MD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-1721

    Steven E. Petersen, PhD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-3639

    Disclosure: Dr. Barch has received funding from the NIMH and the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Dr. Luby has received funding from the NIMH. Dr. Petersen has received funding from the McDonnell Foundation. Dr. Gaffrey has reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

    View full text