Physics contribution
Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.010Get rights and content

Purpose: To scrutinize the positioning accuracy and reproducibility of a commercial hexapod robot treatment table (HRTT) in combination with a commercial cone-beam computed tomography system for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

Methods and Materials: The mechanical stability of the X-ray volume imaging (XVI) system was tested in terms of reproducibility and with a focus on the moveable parts, i.e., the influence of kV panel and the source arm on the reproducibility and accuracy of both bone and gray value registration using a head-and-neck phantom. In consecutive measurements the accuracy of the HRTT for translational, rotational, and a combination of translational and rotational corrections was investigated. The operational range of the HRTT was also determined and analyzed.

Results: The system performance of the XVI system alone was very stable with mean translational and rotational errors of below 0.2 mm and below 0.2°, respectively. The mean positioning accuracy of the HRTT in combination with the XVI system summarized over all measurements was below 0.3 mm and below 0.3° for translational and rotational corrections, respectively. The gray value match was more accurate than the bone match.

Conclusion: The XVI image acquisition and registration procedure were highly reproducible. Both translational and rotational positioning errors can be corrected very precisely with the HRTT. The HRTT is therefore well suited to complement cone-beam computed tomography to take full advantage of position correction in six degrees of freedom for IGRT. The combination of XVI and the HRTT has the potential to improve the accuracy of high-precision treatments.

Introduction

Recent improvements in radiotherapy planning and delivery (1, 2) have made it possible to achieve highly conformal dose distributions that can, in theory, be delivered with a very high degree of geometrical accuracy. However, temporal changes in the patient’s anatomy, i.e., inter- and intrafractional organ motion, and patient setup errors (3) result in blurring of the planned dose distribution, i.e., the slope of the dose gradients become shallower (4, 5, 6). The deviation from the planned dose distribution may lead to suboptimal dose coverage on the edge of the tumor or to increased dose to the critical structures. This can lead to a reduction in local tumor control and an increase in unwanted side effects. Therefore, patient setup verification is of paramount importance to minimize the above effects.

To ensure correct delivery, safety margins are applied (7) at the planning stage and the treatment fields are usually simulated before treatment on a treatment simulator. Typically, on the first day of treatment, and in short intervals thereafter, electronic portal images are acquired to verify the patient setup (8, 9). Because of the limited contrast in the images, it is often not possible to verify the position of the tumor itself but rather the position of surrogate landmarks, such as bony anatomy or other prominent structures, which may or may not be rigidly connected with the tumor. More sophisticated image-guided approaches that use three-dimensional volume information include mobile in-room computed tomography (CT) scanners (10), CT on rails (11, 12), B-mode ultrasound systems (13, 14), tomotherapy (15, 16), and kilo-voltage (17, 18) and mega-voltage (19, 20, 21) cone-beam CT scanners (CBCT). Furthermore, these imaging modalities are not restricted to assess the setup error based on the bony anatomy but offer image quality with sufficient soft-tissue contrast. This work focuses on the Elekta Synergy S (Elekta, Crawley, UK) accelerator with kilo-voltage CBCT, also referred to as the X-ray volume imaging (XVI) system.

The advantage of CBCT scanners for patient setup verification is that a complete set of volume information is acquired with a high resolution in all three dimensions. Acquisition of the CBCT study is carried out in the treatment position on the treatment table without the need for moving either the table or the patient. Image registration between the planning CT and the CBCT reveals full three-dimensional information regarding the difference in patient position, hence the tumor position, between the planning CT and the current position on the treatment table. It has been shown that with the XVI system subpixel size setup errors (22) can be correctly determined, which makes it suitable for treatments where high precision is indispensable, such as cranial stereotactic treatments. With XVI the setup error is expressed by means of three translational and three rotational correction vectors. Applying these six corrections accurately ensures that the tumor is treated as planned assuming no intrafractional organ movement. It has been noted by Sharpe et al. that in combination with XVI it is indeed the standard Elekta table that restricts the capacity to correct setup errors to a few tenths of a millimeter (23). In addition, standard treatment tables do not allow rotational corrections around the main translational axis except for isocentric table rotation. The approach discussed in this article utilizes a dedicated treatment table that permits automatic corrections in six degrees of freedom and therefore allows taking full advantage of the CBCT.

The HexaPOD treatment table from Medical Intelligence (Schwabmünchen, Germany) is a robotic carbon fiber table with six independent actuators capable of correcting setup errors in all six degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z, pitch, roll and yaw). The table positioning is computer-controlled via a personal computer outside the treatment room. The first combination of Elekta Synergy S with CBCT and the HexaPOD was installed at the University of Wuerzburg in June 2005. The aim of this study was to scrutinize the positioning accuracy and reproducibility of the HexaPOD in combination with the Synergy S cone-beam CT in a clinical environment.

Section snippets

Methods and materials

To establish a relationship to clinical applications, the head of the Alderson phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) was used as a virtual test patient. The Alderson head phantom was rigidly fixated on the HexaPOD treatment table using a scotch cast wrapping mask and the Stryker-Leibinger stereotactic system (24) as shown in Fig. 1. A planning CT image study was acquired with 3-mm slice thickness on a Siemens Somatom Sensation Open 20 (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) CT scanner. The image

Results

With the gray value match it was possible to exactly detect translational displacements as small as 0.1 mm in axial and in superior-inferior direction, with zero deviation in all six degrees of freedom. With the bone match a predefined displacement of 0.1 mm in axial direction (x) resulted in a correction vector in x, y, z, u, v, and w of 0.5 mm, −0.1 mm, 0.3 mm, −0.2°, −0.2°, and 0.1°, respectively, and in superior-inferior direction (y) of 0.1 mm, −0.1 mm, 0.3 mm, −0.3°, 0.4°, and 0°. For a

Discussion

Image-guided radiotherapy has regained popularity and attention in recent years. This can be attributed to the fact that it is now possible to deliver highly conformal dose distributions with a very high degree of geometrical and dosimetrical accuracy with either intensity-modulated radiotherapy or with stereotactic treatments. This has led to the development of new imaging approaches, such as CBCT, to ensure that the actual treatment deviates as little as possible from the planned treatment,

Conclusions

The positioning accuracy of the robotic HexaPOD in combination with the Elekta Synergy S CBCT was investigated. First, the reproducibility of image acquisition and image registration with the XVI software was determined for both bone and gray value match. Translational and rotational corrections with the HexaPOD as well as the combination of both were examined separately, and the resulting positioning errors were recorded. A submillimeter positioning accuracy was found in the translational axis

References (30)

Cited by (118)

  • ESTRO ACROP guideline for target volume delineation of skull base tumors

    2021, Radiotherapy and Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Dose conformity is improved using IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques [44]. Patients are usually immobilized in a high precision frameless stereotactic mask fixation system and submillimeter accuracy of patient positioning in the treatment room is achieved using modern image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies, such as orthogonal x-rays (ExacTrac®Xray 6D system) or cone beam CT (CBCT) [34–38]. For patients with large complex skull base tumors receiving conventionally fractionated SRT, IMRT and VMAT planning techniques are increasingly being used over 3D conformal RT because of its better target coverage and OARs sparing, although at the cost of larger volumes receiving low dose radiation.

  • The influence of a six degrees of freedom couch and an individual head support in patient positioning in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer

    2019, Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The 6DOF couch provides optimal patient position correction. Nowadays, this type of couch is increasingly used and is considered state of the art care [5,14–16,20]. It is able to achieve submillimetre positioning accuracy [20].

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was partially supported by a grant from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung, Germany and Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK.

Conflict of interest: none.

View full text