Operational principles of neurocognitive networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Large-scale neural networks are thought to be an essential substrate for the implementation of cognitive function by the brain. If so, then a thorough understanding of cognition is not possible without knowledge of how the large-scale neural networks of cognition (neurocognitive networks) operate. Of necessity, such understanding requires insight into structural, functional, and dynamical aspects of network operation, the intimate interweaving of which may be responsible for the intricacies of cognition.

Knowledge of anatomical structure is basic to understanding how neurocognitive networks operate. Phylogenetically and ontogenetically determined patterns of synaptic connectivity form a structural network of brain areas, allowing communication between widely distributed collections of areas. The function of neurocognitive networks depends on selective activation of anatomically linked cortical and subcortical areas in a wide variety of configurations. Large-scale functional networks provide the cooperative processing which gives expression to cognitive function. The dynamics of neurocognitive network function relates to the evolving patterns of interacting brain areas that express cognitive function in real time.

This article considers the proposition that a basic similarity of the structural, functional, and dynamical features of all neurocognitive networks in the brain causes them to function according to common operational principles. The formation of neural context through the coordinated mutual constraint of multiple interacting cortical areas, is considered as a guiding principle underlying all cognitive functions. Increasing knowledge of the operational principles of neurocognitive networks is likely to promote the advancement of cognitive theories, and to seed strategies for the enhancement of cognitive abilities.

Introduction

The gap between knowledge of the brain and of the mind can only be bridged with understanding of neural systems that perform cognitive operations. According to this perspective, the neurocognitive network is a critical concept for uniting neuroscience and cognitive science. Neurocognitive networks are integrated large-scale neural systems that execute the high-level brain functions of which cognition is comprised (Luria, 1962, Başar et al., 1975a, Başar et al., 1975b, Goldman-Rakic, 1988, Mesulam, 1990, Fuster, 1995, Fuster, 2003, Bressler, 1995, Bressler, 1999, Bressler, 2002, Bressler, 2003a, Bressler, 2003b, Bullmore et al., 1996, Mountcastle, 1998, McIntosh, 2000, Nyberg et al., 2000, Hirsch et al., 2001, Başar and Karakaş, 2004). Although multitudinous in the variety of their expression, it is not unreasonable that these networks should follow common laws of operation, given the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological similarity that exists throughout the brain. The intent of this article is to consider what general principles might guide the operations of neurocognitive networks.

The approach to be followed is based on the tenet that there exist fundamental correspondences among the anatomical structure of neurocognitive networks, their functions, and the dynamic patterning of their active states (Arbib et al., 1997). The anatomical architecture of the network provides the basic substrate of interconnected brain regions that, by way of their interactions, are able to express particular functions, different functions depending on the specific subsets of connected regions that cooperate. The functions of the neurocognitive network are expressed in real time by the coordinated actions of cooperating areas, with the states of coordination changing dynamically (Bressler and Kelso, 2001).

In this process, the active states of neurocognitive networks are selectively structured in three key dimensions (Fig. 1). First, they are spatially structured by the combined activation of discrete, local cortical and subcortical neuronal assemblies. Next, they are temporally structured by the changing combinatorial arrangement of active assemblies during the expression of cognitive functions. Finally they are coordinatively structured by the specifically patterned joint actions of activated assemblies. The presumption that neurocognitive networks do in fact implement cognitive function further implies that the expression of cognitive function occurs as structured states, with a structure corresponding to that of the active states of neurocognitive networks. Thus, by careful examination of the anatomical, functional, and dynamical aspects of neurocognitive networks, we anticipate the eventual emergence of a neural language for describing cognition.

Section snippets

Anatomical structure of neurocognitive networks

We consider the anatomical organization of neurocognitive networks to be of prime importance in shaping the cognitive operations of the brain. Neural networks may be described at various scales, from small assemblies of neurons to the whole brain. For the purpose of this review, we focus on the cerebral cortex as an essential anatomical component of neurocognitive networks, treating network organization in terms of the long-range connectivity of local cortical areas.

The cerebral cortex is

Functional expression of neurocognitive networks

The intricate anatomical connectivity of the cerebral cortex provides the basis for an enormous space of possible combinations of co-active areas. The guiding concept in this section is that the functional expression of a cognitive operation requires co-activation of a specific combination of interconnected local area networks. The co-activated local area networks represent a subset of the total set of possible networks in the cerebral cortex. The members of this subset act in concert as a

Dynamics of neurocognitive networks

We consider neurocognitive networks to be flexibly adaptive to the rapidly changing computational demands of cognitive processing (Bressler, 1995). This adaptivity requires that the neurocognitive network be able to organize and reorganize in different patterns of coordination as computationally required on a sub-second time scale. The large-scale anatomical connectivity of the cerebral cortex provides a richly intricate structure within which the constituent local area networks have an

Coordination and cognition

We have argued here that the neural underpinning of cognition is best understood through the study of neurocognitive networks, which, following the organizational approach of Arbib et al. (1997), may be pursued through the joint consideration of neuroanatomical structure, neurophysiological function, and neuronal assembly dynamics of the cerebral cortex. When examined from this perspective, cognition is seen as a dynamic process that rapidly evolves through a series of informationally

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant IBN0090717, and National Institute of Mental Health Grants MH64204 and MH42900.

References (146)

  • J.-P. Changeux et al.

    Neuronal models of cognitive functions

    Cognition

    (1989)
  • O. David et al.

    A multitrial analysis for revealing significant corticocortical networks in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • D.I. Donaldson

    Parsing brain activity with fMRI and mixed designs: what kind of a state is neuroimaging in?

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2004)
  • An.A. Fingelkurts et al.

    Functional connectivity in the brain— is it an elusive concept?

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2005)
  • J.M. Fuster

    Cortical dynamics of memory

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (2000)
  • G.L. Gerstein et al.

    Identification of functionally related neural assemblies

    Brain Res.

    (1978)
  • S. Grossberg

    The complementary brain: unifying brain dynamics and modularity

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2000)
  • P. Hagmann et al.

    DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: statistical fibre tracking and virtual dissection

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • L. Harrison et al.

    Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • L. Hernandez et al.

    Temporal sensitivity of event-related fMRI

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • B. Horwitz

    The elusive concept of brain connectivity

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • B. Horwitz et al.

    Neural modeling, functional brain imaging and cognition

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (1999)
  • B. Horwitz et al.

    Neural modeling and functional brain imaging: an overview

    Neural Netw.

    (2000)
  • S. Karakaş et al.

    A new strategy involving multiple cognitive paradigms demonstrates that ERP components are determined by the superposition of oscillatory responses

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2000)
  • A. Keil et al.

    Functional correlates of macroscopic high-frequency brain activity in the human visual system

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2001)
  • W. Klimesch

    EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis

    Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.

    (1999)
  • T. Koenig et al.

    Millisecond by millisecond, year by year: normative EEG microstates and developmental stages

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • B. Kolb

    The twentieth century belongs to neuropsychology

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1999)
  • M. Matelli et al.

    Architectonics of the primates cortex: usefulness and limits

    Cortex

    (2004)
  • 2004. Special issue on functional connectivity. Neuroinformatics,...
  • E.D. Adrian

    The Basis of Sensation: the Action of the Sense Organs

    (1928)
  • A.M.H.J. Aertsen et al.

    Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of “effective connectivity”

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1989)
  • N.C. Andreasen

    A unitary model of schizophrenia: Bleuler's “fragmented phrene” as schizencephaly

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • M. Arbib et al.

    Neural Organization: Structure, Function and Dynamics

    (1997)
  • A. Arieli et al.

    Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses

    Science

    (1996)
  • H. Atlan

    Entre le Cristal et la Fumée

    (1979)
  • H.L. Atwood et al.

    Silent synapses in neural plasticity: current evidence

    Learn. Mem.

    (1999)
  • H.B. Barlow

    Single neurons and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology

    Perception

    (1972)
  • E. Başar et al.

    Memory and whole-brain work: draft of a theory based on EEG oscillations

  • E. Başar et al.

    Dynamics of brain rhythmic and evoked potentials. II. Studies in the auditory pathway, reticular formation, and hippocampus during the waking stage

    Biol. Cybern.

    (1975)
  • E. Başar et al.

    Dynamics of brain rhythmic and evoked potentials. III. Studies in the auditory pathway, reticular formation, and hippocampus during sleep

    Biol. Cybern.

    (1975)
  • G.G. Blasdel et al.

    Voltage-sensitive dyes reveal a modular organization in monkey striate cortex

    Nature

    (1986)
  • V. Braitenberg et al.

    Anatomy of the Cortex

    (1991)
  • S.L. Bressler

    The dynamic manifestation of cognitive structures in the cerebral cortex

  • S.L. Bressler

    Understanding cognition through large-scale cortical networks

    Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.

    (2002)
  • S.L. Bressler

    Cortical coordination dynamics and the disorganization syndrome in schizophrenia

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2003)
  • S.L. Bressler

    Context rules

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2003)
  • S.L. Bressler

    Inferential constraint sets in the organization of visual expectation

    Neuroinformatics

    (2004)
  • P. Broca

    Remarques sur le siège de la faculté de langage articulé, suivis d'une observation d'aphémie

    Bull. Soc. Anat.

    (1861)
  • K. Brodmann

    Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues

    (1909)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text