Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volume 44, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 377-388

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023 Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival and success rates of osseointegrated implants determined in longitudinal studies that conducted a follow-up of at least 10 years. A broad electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant publications in indexed journals, evaluating the clinical performance of dental implants. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers analyzed titles, abstracts, and complete articles, prioritizing studies of the randomized clinical trial type. A total of 23 articles were included in this review. Ten prospective studies, nine retrospective studies, and four randomized clinical trials, which evaluated 7711 implants, were selected. The mean follow-up time of the studies included was 13.4 years. All of the studies reported survival rates and mean marginal bone resorption values, with cumulative mean values of 94.6% and 1.3 mm, respectively. Fourteen studies related success rates. Taking into consideration the disparate outcome measures employed to assess dental implant performance and within the limitations of this systematic review, we may affirm that osseointegrated implants are safe and present high survival rates and minimal marginal bone resorption in the long term.

Section snippets

Focused question and study objective

The focused research question was “What is the survival and success rate of implants in a period of at least 10 years of follow-up?” The objective of this systematic review was to attempt to fill the void in the literature related to the long-term survival and success data of dental implants. This knowledge provides a basis on which the clinician can make decisions in treatment planning.

Development of a protocol

To investigate the survival/success rate of implants, an extensive search was done to identify longitudinal

Search results

The initial search resulted in 6958 titles in MEDLINE/PubMed and 89 titles in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The titles that had no abstract available and those that deviated from the subject of this systematic review were excluded. After the first analysis, the abstracts of 135 articles were obtained. Fifty-nine complete articles were chosen for careful reading. After evaluating each article, 23 studies published between the years 1999 and 2014 were selected.3, 6, 24, 25,

Discussion

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival/success rates of osseointegrated implants by means of analyzing longitudinal studies that conducted a follow-up of 10 or more years.

Following the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria and careful quality analysis, a high number of the pre-selected articles were excluded. For this review, preference was given to controlled RCTs, as they are the studies preferred for the elaboration of longitudinal studies in implant

References (69)

R. Adell et al.
A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw
Int J Oral Surg
(1981)
R. Adell
Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws
J Prosthet Dent
(1983)
D.E. Smith et al.
Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants
J Prosthet Dent
(1989)
P.A. Schnitman et al.
Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants
J Am Dent Assoc
(1979)
D.L. Turpin
CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2005)
N. Pandis
The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2011)
S.S. Pikner et al.
Marginal bone loss at implants: a retrospective long-term follow-up of turned Brånemark system implants
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
(2009)
C.M. ten Bruggenkate et al.
Success criteria in oral implantology: a review of the literature
Int J Oral Implantol
(1990)
P. Simonis et al.
Long-term implant survival and success: a 10–16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2010)
C.E. Misch et al.
Implant success, survival and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa consensus conference
Implant Dent
(2008)

T. Berglundh et al.

A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years

J Clin Periodontol

(2002)

T. Albrektsson et al.

The long-term efficacy of current used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

(1986)

T. Albrektsson et al.

Consensus report of Session IV

J. Roos et al.

A quantitative and qualitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective study of the Brånemark Implant

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

(1997)

G.A. Zarb et al.

Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants

J Prosthet Dent

(1998)

I.K. Karoussis et al.

Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System

Clin Oral Implants Res

(2003)

I. Needleman et al.

Systematic review of outcome measurements and reference group(s) to evaluate and compare implant success and failure

J Clin Periodontol

(2012)

K.R. Stevens

Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice

AACN Clin Issue

(2001)

A. Liberati et al.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

PLoS Med

(2009)

C. Schardt et al.

Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

(2007)

Q.V. Nguyen et al.

A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries

Eur J Orthod

(1999)

I.G. Needleman

A guide to systematic reviews

J Clin Periodontol

(2002)

J.P. Higgins et al.

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

BMJ

(2003)

K.F. Schulz et al.

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials

Obstet Gynecol

(2010)

P. Åstrand et al.

Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

(2008)

D.A. Deporter et al.

Performance of sintered, porous-surface, press-fit implants after 10 years of function in the partially edentulous posterior mandible

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent

(2012)

D.A. Deporter et al.

Performance of titanium alloy sintered porous-surface (SPS) implants supporting mandibular overdentures during a 20-year prospective study

Clin Oral Implants Res

(2014)

G.E. Carlsson et al.

Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients

Int J Prosthodont

(2000)

M. Degidi et al.

10-year follow up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

(2012)

K.A. Gotfredsen

10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

(2012)

R. Jacobs et al.

A split-mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw-shaped titanium implant systems

J Clin Periodontol

(2010)

T. Jemt et al.

Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

(2006)

T. Jemt

Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla

Int J Prosthodont

(2008)

T.J. Ji et al.

Immediate loading of maxillary and mandibular implant supported fixed complete dentures: a 1- to 10-year retrospective study

J Oral Implantol

(2012)

Cited by (466)

Treatment strategies for dental implant removal: A literature review
2024, Japanese Dental Science Review
Dental implants have been widely used with success, but long-term usage sometimes leads to implant loss. The purpose of this review was to summarize the etiology of early and late failure requiring dental implant removal and the treatment strategies for the removal of failed implants and reimplantation. Early failures are often caused by patient-related factors, such as smoking, diabetes, radiotherapy, bone quality, and periodontitis of the remaining natural teeth. The most common cause of late failure is peri-implantitis, followed by implant fracture and implant malpositioning. Implants should be removed if they are mobile or if their superstructure cannot be maintained (e.g., implant fracture). For peri-implantitis, implant removal should be determined based on the patient’s age and esthetic needs, the implant site, and the severity of bone loss. Many reports have been published on implant removal techniques. The reverse torque technique should always be the first choice because of its low invasiveness. The weighted survival rate for the replacement of failed implants is 86.3%, with a much lower survival rate after the second or subsequent implantations. Therefore, patient-specific problems, such as smoking habits and bruxism, should be checked before reimplantation and controlled to the greatest extent possible.
Establishing a novel deep learning model for detecting peri-implantitis
2024, Journal of Dental Sciences
Background/purpose: The diagnosis of peri-implantitis using periapical radiographs is crucial. Recently, artificial intelligence may apply in radiographic image analysis effectively. The aim of this study was to differentiate the degree of marginal bone loss of an implant, and also to classify the severity of peri-implantitis using a deep learning model. Materials and methods: A dataset of 800 periapical radiographic images were divided into training (n = 600), validation (n = 100), and test (n = 100) datasets with implants used for deep learning. An object detection algorithm (YOLOv7) was used to identify peri-implantitis. The classification performance of this model was evaluated using metrics, including the specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results: Considering the classification performance, the specificity was 100%, precision was 100%, recall was 94.44%, and F1 score was 97.10%. Conclusion: Results of this study suggested that implants can be identified from periapical radiographic images using deep learning-based object detection. This identification system could help dentists and patients suffering from implant problems. However, more images of other implant systems are needed to increase the learning performance to apply this system in clinical practice.
Influence of implant length and diameter on implant failure: A retrospective study
2024, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology
Dental implants are widely accepted in the dental community. Although several studies have reported high dental implant survival rates, complications can still occur. Implant failure is associated with different risk factors, including implant length and diameter. However, no clear consensus has yet been reached. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different risk factors associated with implant failure.
This study included patients who received dental implants at Kyoto University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were dental implants placed between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2022. Data on patient- and implant-related variables were collected. We used a marginal Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association between the potential factors and implant failure.
This study included 147 patients who received 479 dental implants. Eleven of the 147 patients experienced implant failure, whereas 17 of the 479 implants failed. The cumulative survival rate of dental implants at the final time point was 95.3%. Multivariable marginal Cox analysis showed suggestive evidence that implant length (<10 mm) greatly increased the risk of implant failure compared with implant length (≥10 mm) (reference: <10 mm, hazard ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.34; p = 0.001).
A cumulative survival rate comparable to that reported in other studies was achieved over prolonged periods of time. Although implant failure is multifactorial and implant length is only one of many factors contributing to implant loss, clinicians must be aware of the potential influence of implant length and make treatment decisions.
Osteogenic properties of bioactive titanium in inflammatory environment
2023, Dental Materials
It is very important that the effects of surface modified titanium on osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in the process of bone regeneration. The bio-function of modified titanium could be affected by the inflammatory micro-environment. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of modified titanium on osteogenic differentiation in the inflammatory conditions and the osteogenic properties of the modified titanium dental implant in vivo.
The medical pure titanium metals (PT-Ti) subjected to Anodic Oxidation (AO-Ti), Sand Blasting/acid etching (SLA-Ti) and Plasma-sprayed HA coating (HA coating-Ti) were used for regulating the osteogenic properties of MSCs in the normal and inflammatory conditions.
The amount of the MSCs in the inflammatory environment were more similar to that in the non-inflammatory environment after cultured on AO-Ti samples for 7D. However, the proliferation of the MSCs was obviously inhibited on the other groups in the inflammatory condition. The morphology of MSC cells on the modified titanium surface was affected in the inflammatory conditions and the AO-Ti was more conducive to maintain the skeletal morphology of MSCs. The results of osteogenic related proteins expression showed that the amount of BMP-2 on AO-Ti group was the highest in the inflammatory conditions, and followed the order of AO-Ti > HA coating-Ti > SLA-Ti > PT-Ti. What’s more, the AO-Ti samples were more beneficial to promote the expression of osteogenic genes ALP, OCN, COL-I and Runx2 in the inflammatory conditions. The results of osteogenic properties in vivo showed that the gingival depth of the AO-Ti group was smaller than that on the other groups. Some new bone could be observed around the AO-Ti implant at two weeks. The bone binding rates on AO-Ti group was the highest of 81.3% after implanted for one year.
The AO-Ti was beneficial to osteogenic differentiation than other modified titanium metals in inflammatory condition. The anodic oxidation is an effective surface modification method on titanium to promote bone regeneration.
Pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study
2023, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Rehabilitation of the partially or completely edentulous posterior maxilla using dental implants is a clinical challenge because of the presence of the maxillary sinus, as well as the low quality and quantity of bone in that region. In addition to bone augmentation procedures, posterior maxillary rehabilitation using implants includes their anchoring in bones such as the zygoma, pterygoid, and maxillary tuberosity, as well as in short implants. However, the performance of pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla is unclear.
The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the survival of tuberosity and pterygoid implants in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy.
A nonprobability convenient sample of patients who had received fixed prostheses on implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity or pterygoid regions was analyzed retrospectively. Demographic variables included sex (male, female) and age. Implant-related variables included surface characteristics, site of placement, implant design, length, diameter, and anteroposterior insertion angle. Prosthetic-related variables included the type of reconstruction for rehabilitation and loading protocols. Implant survival, complications, crestal bone loss, and follow-up intervals were also documented. Collected data were analyzed at both patient and implant levels. The demographics and implant characteristics of patients receiving pterygoid or tuberosity implants were analyzed with a statistical software program (α=.05). Survival analysis was estimated by using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier curve.
A total of 119 patients had 183 pterygoid or tuberosity implants inserted. Most implants in the pterygoid region (71.5%) were Ø4.1 mm (87.4%) and 15 mm in length (60.1%). The most common prostheses were complete maxillary reconstructions (49.2%) with late loading (74.3%). The average implant anteroposterior insertion angle was 60.8 degrees. The cumulative survival rate was 97.3% (n=178) during the mean follow-up period of 57 months (range 1 to 168 months). Among all implants placed, 2.7% failed (n=5) within 2 months of their placement. The statistically significant differences noted between tuberosity and pterygoid implants were related to design, surface characteristics, and loading. The average crestal bone loss was 1.5 mm.
The survival of the implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity and pterygoid regions was high in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy.
In vitro assessment of internal implant-abutment connections with different cone angles under static loading using synchrotron-based radiation
2024, BMC Oral Health

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Systematic Review PaperDental ImplantsEvaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review

Abstract

Section snippets

Focused question and study objective

Development of a protocol

Search results

Discussion

Int J Oral Surg

J Prosthet Dent

J Prosthet Dent

J Am Dent Assoc

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Marginal bone loss at implants: a retrospective long-term follow-up of turned Brånemark system implants

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

Success criteria in oral implantology: a review of the literature

Int J Oral Implantol

Long-term implant survival and success: a 10–16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants

Clin Oral Implants Res

Implant success, survival and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa consensus conference

Implant Dent

A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years

J Clin Periodontol

The long-term efficacy of current used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

Consensus report of Session IV

A quantitative and qualitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective study of the Brånemark Implant

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants

J Prosthet Dent

Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System

Clin Oral Implants Res

Systematic review of outcome measurements and reference group(s) to evaluate and compare implant success and failure

J Clin Periodontol

Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice

AACN Clin Issue

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

PLoS Med

Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries

Eur J Orthod

A guide to systematic reviews

J Clin Periodontol

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

BMJ

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials

Obstet Gynecol

Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

Performance of sintered, porous-surface, press-fit implants after 10 years of function in the partially edentulous posterior mandible

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent

Performance of titanium alloy sintered porous-surface (SPS) implants supporting mandibular overdentures during a 20-year prospective study

Clin Oral Implants Res

Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients

Int J Prosthodont

10-year follow up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

A split-mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw-shaped titanium implant systems

J Clin Periodontol

Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla

Int J Prosthodont

Immediate loading of maxillary and mandibular implant supported fixed complete dentures: a 1- to 10-year retrospective study

J Oral Implantol

Systematic Review Paper
Dental Implants
Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review