ReviewEarly mobilisation for patients following acute myocardiac infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
Introduction
Major medical advances throughout the last 2 decades in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have resulted in a decrease in AMI mortality (Braunwald, 2002). In addition to reperfusion strategies (i.e. percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention [PTCI] or thrombolysis) and effective medications, other effective treatments include educational programs, targeted management of risk factors and the implementation of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs (Jollife et al., 2001, Oldridge et al., 1988, Taylor et al., 2004). In general, the earlier the initiation of these interventions after an AMI, the greater the benefit (Aversano et al., 2002, Fernandez-Aviles et al., 2004). Despite these significant advances, mortality after AMI remains substantial, and access to therapies is still limited. There is a need for further cost-effective interventions to ensure patients suffering an AMI survive.
Although bed rest has been less recommended as part of the in-hospital treatment to AMI patients, is still practiced and prescribed. Over the last decades there has been a trend to reduce the extent of the recommended bed rest, and the length of hospital stay for AMI patients towards the early discharge, not assuring with this the beginning of phase I rehabilitation at home. Mostly nurses have to make the decision of early ambulate these patients, but the guidelines to base this intervention even for complicated or uncomplicated AMI cases is very lack.
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association current guidelines for the care of patients after ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) recommend bed rest for the first 12–24 h for uncomplicated patients and discourage mobilisation for complicated patients (level of evidence C) (Antman et al., 2005). The recommendation for patients with unstable angina and non-STEMI is bed rest with no specifics regarding timing or level of activity (level of evidence C) (ACC/AHA, 2002).
Although the introduction of reperfusion strategies has led to shorter hospital stays (thus reducing the bed rest) (Spencer et al., 2004), an average AMI patient in western countries stays, at the turn of this century, for about a week in hospital (Kauf et al., 2006), and even a month in Japan (Kinjo et al., 2004). Currently only half of AMI patients of developed countries (35% with STEMI and 60% with non-STEMI) undergo reperfusion strategies, which partially explains hospital stays longer than recommended (Kaul et al., 2004).
Prolonged bed rest, described as varying between 6 and 20 h, is associated with cardiac deconditioning (Chobanian et al., 1974, Saltin et al., 1968, Convertino et al., 1981, Allen et al., 1999, Miller et al., 1976). Studies have shown reduced stroke volumes (Chobanian et al., 1974) and oxygen peak uptake (VO2) (Saltin et al., 1968) and increased heart rates among individuals exposed to prolonged bed rest (Convertino et al., 1981). A systematic review of 39 randomised controlled trials studying the effects of bed rest in a variety of clinical problems (n = 5777) showed a number of unfavourable results associated with bed rest (Allen et al., 1999). Prolonged bed rest has also been associated with increased risk of pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrhythmic death (Miller et al., 1976).
Despite the evolving patterns of care, a substantial group of AMI patients may still be exposed to prolonged bed rest. Since AMI patients are at higher risk of death during the first week after the event, determining the relative impact of mobilisation as part of their initial treatment remains important. We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the following question: is there an impact on mortality and re-infarction rates among patients receiving early mobilisation after an AMI?
Section snippets
Eligibility criteria
We included studies of AMI inpatients receiving the conventional treatment at the time, in which the experimental intervention was early mobilisation (EM), defined as programmed changes of position from bed to chair, bed to standing, or bed to walking added to conventional care while in hospital. Eligible studies had to compare EM with prescribed bed rest or conventional care alone. We included experimental studies reported in any language, allocating (at random or not) participants to early
Characteristics of the included studies
We identified 14 studies including 3148 patients that fulfilled our eligibility criteria (Fig. 1). The Kappa statistic for agreement on study eligibility was 0.77 (95% CI 0.26, 100). The reports of the included studies were published in English (n = 12) (19–30) and German (n = 2) (31–32). Ten of the studies were published before 1980 and only 1 after 1982. All studies enrolled patients defined as having uncomplicated AMI, except for Abraham et al. (1975), who enrolled patients with both complicated
Discussion
Our systematic review demonstrates a trend towards lower mortality in AMI patients receiving EM. If true, the 15% relative risk reduction could save thousands of lives annually. The biology of EM would suggest that AMI patients at different absolute risk levels receiving different background treatments may benefit from it. The data presented in this systematic review, from experimental studies prior to the use of reperfusion strategies, emphasise the need for updated randomised controlled
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
Olga L. Cortés was a recipient of a Nursing Fellowship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Juan C. Villar was a recipient of a Doctoral Research Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. We thank Dr. H.M. Arthur for logistic support and Dr. P. Bercik for translation of German articles.
References (45)
- et al.
Arterial baroreflex impairment in patients during acute coronary occlusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
(1998) - et al.
Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Early mobilization after myocardial infarction. A controlled study
Am. J. Cardiol.
(1974) - et al.
Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Controlled trial of early mobilisation and discharge from hospital in uncomplicated myocardial infarction
Lancet
(1971) - et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin. Trials
(1996) - et al.
The cost of acute myocardial infarction in the new millennium: evidence from a multinational registry
Am. Heart J.
(2006) - et al.
International differences in evolution of early discharge after acute myocardial infarction
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and beta-blocker therapy on heart rate variability after first acute myocardial infarction
Am. J. Cardiol.
(1998) - et al.
Temporary decrease in cardiac parasympathetic tone after acute myocardial infarction
Am. J. Cardiol.
(1988)
Effect of rapid mobilization on ejection fractions and ventricular volumes after acute myocardial infarction
Am. J. Cardiol.
Baroreflex sensitivity and its evolution during the first year after myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Am. J. Med.
Value of early ambulation in patients with and without complications after acute myocardial infarction
N. Engl. J. Med.
Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
JAMA
Personal reflections on efforts to reduce ischemic myocardial damage
Cardiovasc. Res.
The metabolic and hemodynamic effects of prolonged bed rest in normal subjects
Circulation
Effects of antiorthostatic bedrest on the cardiorespiratory responses to exercise
Aviat. Space Environ. Med.
Baroreflex sensitivity predicts long-term cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction even in patients with preserved left ventricular function.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
Early mobilisation after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Prospective study of 538 patients
Lancet
Cited by (17)
Early rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction: A nationwide inpatient database study
2021, Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :The present results demonstrated that early rehabilitation did not increase mortality, and, thus, was considered to be safe. While bed rest is often enforced during this period, the findings of a systematic review suggested that early mobilization following AMI is not associated with ischemia or unfavorable outcomes [43]. Previous findings revealed that early ICU rehabilitation was safe and not associated with an increased incidence of coronary ischemia or heart failure when conducted with appropriate timing and discontinuation criteria [44–46].
Early Mobilization in People With Acute Cardiovascular Disease
2021, Canadian Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :One of the most intriguing findings of the study is the 2.6% absolute mortality difference in in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups. In the precoronary revascularization era, a meta-analysis of 14 studies (with 13 studies published before 1983) looking at EM after myocardial infarction (MI) found a 15% decreased mortality trend in groups receiving EM.19 In the general critical care setting, a meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials with 1941 patients compared EM with usual care and found no difference in in-hospital mortality.14
Euroaction cardiac rehabilitation program after infarction
2013, RehabilitacionEarly ambulation-Consider working with physiotherapists. A comment on Cortes et al. (2009)
2010, International Journal of Nursing StudiesA systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of early mobilization therapy in patients after cardiac surgery
2021, Medicine (United States)