Early mobilisation for patients following acute myocardiac infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies

Abstract

Objective

To determine the impact of early mobilisation (EM) on total mortality and non-fatal re-infarction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

MEDLINE, CINAHL, HealthStar, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Registry and experts.

Methods

Target studies included published and unpublished experimental, controlled studies in any language comparing AMI patients allocated to any in-hospital early mobilisation or a control/standard treatment. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. We calculated relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random-effects model.

Outcomes

All-cause mortality or re-infarction up to 1-year post-AMI.

Results

Out of 385 potentially relevant studies, 14 met our eligibility criteria (13 published before 1983). There were 149 deaths (9.3% of 1607) and 82 non-fatal re-infarctions (5.2% of 1580) among post-AMI patients receiving EM, compared with 179 deaths (11.6% of 1541) and 80 non-fatal re-infarctions (5.3% of 1518) among AMI patients receiving control treatment (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.68, 1.05 and RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.75, 1.39 respectively).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrated a trend towards decreased mortality with EM after AMI. However, there is uncertainty about early mobilisation and more research should be developed having into account all kind of differences among patients receiving treatment after AMI worldwide.

Introduction

Major medical advances throughout the last 2 decades in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have resulted in a decrease in AMI mortality (Braunwald, 2002). In addition to reperfusion strategies (i.e. percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention [PTCI] or thrombolysis) and effective medications, other effective treatments include educational programs, targeted management of risk factors and the implementation of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs (Jollife et al., 2001, Oldridge et al., 1988, Taylor et al., 2004). In general, the earlier the initiation of these interventions after an AMI, the greater the benefit (Aversano et al., 2002, Fernandez-Aviles et al., 2004). Despite these significant advances, mortality after AMI remains substantial, and access to therapies is still limited. There is a need for further cost-effective interventions to ensure patients suffering an AMI survive.

Although bed rest has been less recommended as part of the in-hospital treatment to AMI patients, is still practiced and prescribed. Over the last decades there has been a trend to reduce the extent of the recommended bed rest, and the length of hospital stay for AMI patients towards the early discharge, not assuring with this the beginning of phase I rehabilitation at home. Mostly nurses have to make the decision of early ambulate these patients, but the guidelines to base this intervention even for complicated or uncomplicated AMI cases is very lack.

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association current guidelines for the care of patients after ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) recommend bed rest for the first 12–24 h for uncomplicated patients and discourage mobilisation for complicated patients (level of evidence C) (Antman et al., 2005). The recommendation for patients with unstable angina and non-STEMI is bed rest with no specifics regarding timing or level of activity (level of evidence C) (ACC/AHA, 2002).

Although the introduction of reperfusion strategies has led to shorter hospital stays (thus reducing the bed rest) (Spencer et al., 2004), an average AMI patient in western countries stays, at the turn of this century, for about a week in hospital (Kauf et al., 2006), and even a month in Japan (Kinjo et al., 2004). Currently only half of AMI patients of developed countries (35% with STEMI and 60% with non-STEMI) undergo reperfusion strategies, which partially explains hospital stays longer than recommended (Kaul et al., 2004).

Prolonged bed rest, described as varying between 6 and 20 h, is associated with cardiac deconditioning (Chobanian et al., 1974, Saltin et al., 1968, Convertino et al., 1981, Allen et al., 1999, Miller et al., 1976). Studies have shown reduced stroke volumes (Chobanian et al., 1974) and oxygen peak uptake (VO₂) (Saltin et al., 1968) and increased heart rates among individuals exposed to prolonged bed rest (Convertino et al., 1981). A systematic review of 39 randomised controlled trials studying the effects of bed rest in a variety of clinical problems (n = 5777) showed a number of unfavourable results associated with bed rest (Allen et al., 1999). Prolonged bed rest has also been associated with increased risk of pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrhythmic death (Miller et al., 1976).

Despite the evolving patterns of care, a substantial group of AMI patients may still be exposed to prolonged bed rest. Since AMI patients are at higher risk of death during the first week after the event, determining the relative impact of mobilisation as part of their initial treatment remains important. We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the following question: is there an impact on mortality and re-infarction rates among patients receiving early mobilisation after an AMI?