Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: A comprehensive review and identification of environmental public health challenges

Abstract

There is a growing number of studies on the association between ambient air pollution and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but their results have been inconsistent. Consequently, a comprehensive review of this research area is needed. There was a wide variability in studied pregnancy outcomes, observed gestational windows of exposure, observed ambient air pollutants, applied exposure assessment methods and statistical analysis methods

Gestational duration, preterm birth, (low) birth weight, and small for gestational age/intrauterine growth restriction were most commonly investigated pregnancy outcomes. Gestational windows of exposure typically included were whole pregnancy period, 1st, 2nd, 3rd trimester, first and last gestational months. Preterm birth was the outcome most extensively studied across various gestational windows, especially at the beginning and at the end of pregnancy.

Particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and carbon monoxide were the most commonly used markers of ambient air pollution. Continuous monitoring data were frequently combined with spatially more precisely modelled estimates of exposure.

Exposure to particulate matter and ozone over the entire pregnancy was significantly associated with higher risk for preterm birth: the pooled effect estimates were 1.09 (1.03–1.16) per 10 μg/m³ increase in particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or less (PM₁₀)_,1.24 (1.08–1.41) per 10 μg/m³ increase in particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or less (PM_2.5), and 1.03 (1.01–1.04) per 10 ppb increase in ozone. For pregnancy outcomes other than PTB, ranges of observed effect estimates were reported due to smaller number of studies included in each gestational window of exposure.

Further research is needed to link the routine pregnancy outcome data with spatially and temporally resolved ambient air pollution data, while adjusting for commonly defined confounders. Methods for assessing exposure to mixtures of pollutants, indoor air pollution exposure, and various other environmental exposures, need to be developed.

Introduction

Epidemiological studies indicate that currently the ambient air pollution (AAP) represents an important environmental public health issue from individual and public health point of view. Every person is exposed to different concentrations and types of ambient air pollutants during the lifetime (Künzli et al., 2010). It is known that a healthy adult inhales 10–20 m³ of air per day, depending on body constitution and physical activity (Yassi et al., 2001). In a pregnant women, the respiratory adaptation to pregnancy leads to significantly higher tidal volume and higher oxygen consumption (Chang and Streitman, 2012). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 3 million premature deaths worldwide in 2012 could be attributed to AAP (WHO, 2016). Previous epidemiological studies have shown that acute lower respiratory infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, cardiovascular diseases and lung cancer are strongly associated with exposure to AAP (International agency of research on cancer (IARC, 2013, Künzli et al., 2010, Siddika et al., 2016). Based on this evidence, a number of environmental public health measures have been adopted and implemented at the individual and population level to improve the quality of ambient air (Künzli et al., 2010).

In the last decade, a growing body of evidence has associated exposure to AAP during pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes (Bonzini et al., 2010, Dadvand et al., 2013a, Pedersen et al., 2014, Polichetti et al., 2013, Vrijheid et al., 2010), especially fetal growth and gestational duration. Pregnancy may constitute a state particularly susceptible to toxins contained in air pollution because of high level of cell proliferation, organ development and the changing capabilities of fetal metabolism (Selevan et al., 2000). Importantly, the health of newborns is determined by a combination of genetic, environmental and social factors, including maternal health during pregnancy. Although effects of AAP on adverse pregnancy outcomes may be relatively small, larger population attributable health risks may be expected due to the ubiquitous nature of AAP exposure. Therefore, it is important that appropriate policies are adopted on a global scale (Kutlar et al., 2017) to diminish AAP emissions and to raise awareness of pregnant women. AAP exposure is hypothesized to affect the fetus both directly through transplacental exposure or indirectly by affecting physiological changes in the mother (Glinianaia et al., 2004). For instance, maternal hypertensive diseases during pregnancy are leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality as well as preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death (Pedersen et al., 2014). Adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with increased neonatal and childhood morbidity and mortality, as well as the risk of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, liver disease and psychiatric conditions later in life (Barker, 2004, Barker et al., 1989, Barker et al., 1990, Barker et al., 1993, Gopinath et al., 2010, Howson et al., 2013, Mathewson et al., 2017, Osmond and Barker, 2000), which could be associated to AAP.

However, the findings of epidemiological studies on pregnancy outcomes and AAP are still inconsistent (Dadvand et al., 2013a, Li et al., 2017, Polichetti et al., 2013). Recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Bonzini et al., 2010, Bosetti et al., 2010, Chen et al., 2014, Li et al., 2017, Polichetti et al., 2013, Shah et al., 2011, Stieb et al., 2012, Sun et al., 2016, Zhu et al., 2015) identified methodological differences and heterogeneity of results among studies in this research area. Recommendations have been made to conduct more studies that include detailed information on potential confounding factors, use validated method for estimating maternal exposure to various types and concentrations of AAP and refine characterization of critical gestational windows of exposure, specifically time periods shorter than trimester (Bonzini et al., 2010, Lamichhane et al., 2015, Woodruff et al., 2009). Levels of AAP depend on sources and types of air pollution, physicochemical characteristics of pollutants, geographical conditions, meteorological factors, and photochemical processes in the atmosphere (Künzli et al., 2010). In addition, estimated levels of ambient air pollutants are influenced by different exposure assessment methods (Brindley et al., 2004; WHO, 1996). Variation of levels of AAP between study areas may contribute to variability of findings of epidemiological studies in this research area, since the concentration-response relationship has not been established yet (Stieb et al., 2012). Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses limited their scope of research by ambient air pollutants and/or pregnancy outcomes and/or study designs of the included studies. In contrast, we were interested in a more comprehensive review to present the methodological variability and possible sources of lack of the findings.

Consequently, the aim of our work was to comprehensively review the studies on the association of AAP and pregnancy outcomes. The specific goals were a) to outline the pregnancy outcomes according to AAP, exposure assessment methods, potential confounders and gestational windows of exposure; b) to summarize the effect of AAP on pregnancy outcomes in selected studies c) to calculate pooled effect estimates for preterm birth (PTB) and d) to indicate future public health challenges.