Cost-sparing effect of twice-weekly targeted endurance training in type 2 diabetics: A one-year controlled randomized trial

Abstract

Objective

We evaluated the effects of targeted, moderate endurance training on healthcare cost, body composition and fitness in type 2 diabetes patients routinely followed within the French healthcare system.

Design and methods

A total of 25 type 2 diabetic patients was randomly assigned to one of two groups: 13 underwent a training programme (eight sessions, followed by training twice a week for 30–45 minutes at home at the level of the ventilatory threshold [V_T]); and 12 received their usual routine treatment. Both groups were followed for one year to evaluate healthcare costs, exercise effectiveness and a six-minute walking test.

Results

The training prevented loss of maximum aerobic capacity, which decreased slightly in the untrained group (P = 0.014), and resulted in a higher maximum power output (P = 0.041) and six-minute walking distance (P = 0.020). The Voorrips activity score correlated with both $V_{{\text{O}}_{\text{2max}}}$ (r = 0.422, P < 0.05) and six-minute walking distance (r = 0.446, P < 0.05). Changes in $V_{{\text{O}}_{\text{2max}}}$ were negatively correlated with changes in body weight (r = 0.608, P < 0.01). Training decreased the insulin-resistance index (HOMA-IR) by 26% (P < 0.05). Changes in percentages of fat were correlated to changes in waist circumference (r = 0.436, P < 0.05). The total healthcare cost was reduced by 50% in the trained group (€1.65 ± 1 per day versus €3.00 ± 1.47 per day in the untrained group; P < 0.02) due to fewer hospitalizations (P = 0.05) and less use of sulphonylureas (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Endurance training at V_T level prevented the decline in aerobic working capacity seen in untrained diabetics over the study period, and resulted in a marked reduction in healthcare costs due to less treatments and fewer hospitalizations.

Résumé

Objectif

Nous avons évalué les effets d’un entraînement en endurance modéré et ciblé sur les dépenses de santé, la composition corporelle et l’aptitude physique chez des diabétiques de type 2 suivis médicalement dans le système de santé français.

Matériel et méthode

Vingt-cinq diabétiques de type 2 ont été randomisés et répartis en deux groupes : 13 ont suivi un programme d’entraînement physique (huit séances d’éducation à l’hôpital poursuivies à domicile par deux séances hebdomadaires de 30–45 minutes à une intensité correspondant au premier seuil ventilatoire V_T) et les 12 autres poursuivaient leur traitement habituel. Les deux groupes ont été suivis pendant un an avec une évaluation des coûts de santé, des tests d’effort et un test de marche de six minutes.

Résultats

L’entraînement a permis de conserver la capacité maximale aérobie qui a diminué significativement dans le groupe non entraîné (P = 0,014), la puissance maximale (P = 0,04) et la distance parcourue au test de marche de six minutes (P = 0,02) étant plus élevées chez les sujets entraînés. Le score d’activité de Voorrips était corrélé avec la $V_{{\text{O}}_{\text{2max}}}$ (r = 0,44, P < 0,05) et à la distance parcourue au test de marche de six minutes (r = 0,446, P < 0,05). La variation de $V_{{\text{O}}_{\text{2max}}}$ était négativement corrélée à la variation du poids (r = −0,46, P < 0,01). L’entraînement a diminué de 26 % l’index d’insulinorésistance HOMA-IR (P < 0,05). Les variations de pourcentages de masse grasse étaient corrélées avec les modifications du tour de taille (r = 0,436, P < 0,05). Le coût total des soins de santé était inférieur de 50 % dans le groupe entraîné (1,65 ± 1 versus 3 ± 1,47 € par jour, P < 0,02) en raison d’une diminution des hospitalisations (P < 0,05) et d’une diminution des doses de sulfonylurées (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

L’entraînement modéré ciblé au seuil ventilatoire prévient le déclin de la capacité aérobie observé chez le groupe non entraîné et entraîne une nette diminution des coûts de santé due à une diminution des traitements et des hospitalisations.

Introduction

As a sedentary lifestyle is a major determinant of the occurrence and progression of type 2 diabetes [1], [2], exercise training has therefore emerged over the past few decades as a key factor in diabetes management. A recent meta-analysis of 87 studies of the effects of exercise programmes in patients with type 2 diabetes [3] carried out between 1988 and 2004 showed that exercise moderately improves HbA_1c and $V_{{\text{O}}_{\text{2max}}}$, and exerts a small positive effect on fasting blood glucose and cholesterol, while effects on HDL- and LDL-cholesterol subfractions is less evident. The meta-analysis also showed that aerobic exercise is more beneficial than resistance exercise for HbA_1c. In general, exercise appears to be beneficial for patients with overt type 2 diabetes, and these results support the idea that exercise is an essential adjunct to diabetes treatment that can both reduce the need for antidiabetic drugs and work in synergy with them. However, making diabetics take regular exercise is always a challenge [4], [5], [6] and so, in everyday medicine, it is easier for physicians to simply prescribe drugs rather than long-term lifestyle changes.

Most studies of an exercise programme for diabetics apply an exercise intensity based on a fixed percentage of the $V_{{\text{O}}_{\text{2max}}}$, usually ranging from 40 to 75%. In other fields of medicine, more specific targeting that takes into account individual patient characteristics has been shown to improve the efficiency of training. For example, in patients with chronic airways limitation, targeting the level of the ventilatory threshold (V_T) has proved to be more efficient than training at 50% of the maximum heart rate [7]. Such targeting has, until now, rarely been investigated in type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, due to marked differences in diet and exercise across different countries, there is a need for specific studies to investigate this issue on a national basis. This is particularly the case for France, where the relationship between lifestyle and disease exhibits a relatively atypical picture [8], [9].

For these reasons, this controlled randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate the effects of one year of “realistic” (twice weekly) endurance training, targeted at the V_T, on healthcare costs to the French healthcare system and, as explanatory variables, on fitness outcomes, body composition, diabetes treatments and metabolic balance.