Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Distant drivers, including remote market demand, increasingly influence land changes.

  • Environmental policies have indirect and distant land use consequences.

  • Biophysical accounting of flows embodied in trade show mixed patterns.

  • Understanding causal links between flows and land changes require combining tools.

  • Tools include economic models, place-based and value chain analyses, biophysical accounting.

Several streams of research have recently converged to identify the growing importance of distant drivers of land change, interconnections between social-ecological systems that are separated geographically, and the indirect consequences of land use changes. Local to national-scale interventions to promote sustainable land use may have unintended effects owing to a displacement of land use within and across countries. Such leakage or ‘indirect land use change’ critically depends on international geographies of trade. Computing various material flows and environmental indicators embodied in international trade highlights the differences between producer and consumer-based biophysical accounting. Causal attribution of the links between material and monetary flows across countries, and actual land changes and environmental impacts at local level requires a combination of economic simulation models, statistical studies, place-based empirical studies, value chain analyses, and biophysical accounting.

Introduction

Land change science has a tradition of place-based studies, focusing on local causes of land use/cover change, treating national and global factors as boundary conditions [1]. Several independent streams of research have recently converged to identify the growing importance of distant drivers of land change, interconnections between social-ecological systems that are separated geographically, and the indirect consequences of land use changes as they arise across international borders and in the context of differing national policy regimes (Figure 1). The objective of this review is to trace these multiple streams of literature, and propose paths to interweave them. First, we describe the expansion of land change research from local to global processes, taking the example of deforestation, one of the most intensively studied areas of land change. Second, we discuss unintended consequences of local or national policies on land use in other countries  which are likely subject to different national policies. We then review metrics to assess land use and environmental impacts of trade. Finally, we refer to an emerging literature linking local land use changes with socio-economic processes of globalization. We conclude with research perspectives.

Section snippets

From local processes to globalization of land changes

Causes and agents of deforestation have evolved over time [2••]. From 1960s to 1980s, small-scale farmers, sometimes supported by state programs of agricultural modernization or colonization, were the main actors of tropical deforestation. In a neo-Malthusian narrative, poverty, poor agricultural technologies and population growth were viewed as the main causes of deforestation. Pathways to deforestation have been shown however to be more complex, involving economic, demographic, technological,

Unintended consequences of land use policies: leakage and indirect land use changes

Early studies of reforestation and forest transitions  defined as national-scale shifts from shrinking to expanding forest areas  also focused on local and national-scale processes: agricultural intensification and industrialization driving labor scarcity in agriculture and concentrating production on the most suitable land; scarcity of forests driving tree plantation, forestry intensification and forest protection; and tree-based land use intensification by smallholders [16, 17]. Other studies

Biophysical accounting: from land change to environmental impacts

Another stream of research, originating mainly in industrial ecology and ecological economics, links trade with land use through a quantification of material flows embodied in trade. Upstream flows related to land-based products are product-specific and region-specific, depending on the characteristics of production systems. Environmental impacts associated with one unit of traded or consumed product are thus highly variable. Data on international trade volumes alone are therefore insufficient

Other socio-economic dynamics affecting land use

A few geographers and political ecologists studied the impact on agro-ecosystems and land use of various socio-economic trends associated with globalization [48, 49, 50•] (Figure 1). The distant factors affecting land use include a growing concentration of global commodity value chains, foreign investments in land and large-scale land acquisitions by foreign actors, and the emergence of niche commodities destined for high income markets. Other relevant processes are the diffusion of market and

Discussion and conclusion

Land use changes are strongly influenced by globalized flows of commodities, information, capital and people, and are increasingly driven by factors in distant markets, often associated with the growing urban consumer class in emerging markets [54••]. Local to national-scale interventions to promote sustainable land use may have unintended effects abroad owing to a displacement of land use across countries. Understanding these emerging interactions and feedbacks between distant

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgement

Karl-Heinz Erb acknowledges funding from ERC-2010-Stg-263522 LUISE.

References (65)

  • B. Mansfield et al.

    Does economic growth cause environmental recovery? Geographical explanations of forest regrowth

    Geogr Compass

    (2010)
  • Mills Busa JH: Deforestation beyond borders: Addressing the disparity between production and consumption of global...
  • Magliocca NR, Ellis EC. Using pattern-oriented modeling (POM) to cope with uncertainty in multi-scale agent-based...
  • T.K. Rudel et al.

    Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation

    Conserv Biol

    (2009)
  • H.J. Geist et al.

    Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation

    Bioscience

    (2002)
  • R.R. Rindfuss et al.

    Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2004)
  • P.H. Verburg et al.

    Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model

    Environ Manage

    (2002)
  • Weinzettel J, Hertwich EG, Peters GP, Steen-Olsen K, Galli A: Affluence drives the global displacement of land use....
  • K.H. Erb et al.

    Embodied HANPP mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption

    Ecol Econ

    (2009)
  • R.S. DeFries et al.

    Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century

    Nat Geosci

    (2010)
  • M.N. Macedo et al.

    Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2012)
  • K.M. Carlson et al.

    Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2012)
  • K.C. Seto et al.

    Urban land teleconnections and sustainability

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2012)
  • N. van Vliet et al.

    Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: a global assessment

    Global Environ Change

    (2012)
  • T.K. Rudel et al.

    Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change

    Global Environ Change

    (2005)
  • P. Meyfroidt et al.

    Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation

    Annu Rev Environ Resour

    (2011)
  • P. Meyfroidt et al.

    Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2010)
  • P.J.C. Oliveira et al.

    Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon

    Science

    (2007)
  • R. Ewers et al.

    Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage

    Trends Ecol Evol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (490)

    • Biodiversity, peace and conflict: understanding the connections

      2024, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text