Speed of processing and reading disability: A cross-linguistic investigation of dyslexia and borderline intellectual functioning☆
Introduction
It is widely accepted that dyslexia is a neurobiological disorder characterised by ‘difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities’ (International Dyslexia Association, 2002). Evidence about the nature of dyslexia comes from many studies focusing on children with reading difficulties who are of at least average intelligence and for whom deficits in phonological processing appear to be the proximal cause (Vellutino, Fletcher, Snowling, & Scanlon, 2004). However, this ‘prototypical’ view of dyslexia as a modular deficit affecting only phonological processes (Morton & Frith, 1995) is increasingly under scrutiny. Thomas and Karmiloff-Smith (2002) have argued that developmental disorders should be seen as the endpoint of an atypical developmental trajectory and have challenged the assumption of ‘residual normality’. According to such non-modular theories, the causes of dyslexia may also affect the development of general intelligence. Plomin and Kovas (2005) have made a similar argument from the perspective of behaviour-genetics, suggesting that the genes that are associated with learning disorders have general as well as specific effects. According to both these accounts, pure disorders will be rare in development.
A somewhat different challenge to the current conceptualization of dyslexia comes from Pennington (2002) who has argued that single deficits in phonological processing are unlikely to fully account for dyslexia and that speed of processing impairments are an additional risk factor (see also Wolf & Bowers, 1999). In a similar vein, Wimmer (1993), based on studies of German speaking children, has argued for a key role of speed of processing in the etiology of dyslexia. In line with these ideas, a growing body of evidence has suggested that children with dyslexia have speed of processing impairments (Breznitz and Meyler, 2003, Catts et al., 2002, Fawcett et al., 1996, Nicolson and Fawcett, 1994, Sobotka and May, 1977, Stringer and Stanovich, 2000, Willcutt et al., 2005).
In the present paper, we report a study of speed of processing in children with dyslexia designed to elucidate the extent to which dyslexia can be considered a domain-specific disorder that is universal among readers of deep (English) and shallow (Italian) orthographies. Speed of Information Processing (SIP) refers to the rate at which sensory information passing into the nervous system can be operated upon and it is a very basic component of intellectual functioning (Jensen, 1998). The underlying assumption is that an individual’s processing speed places a limit on the amount of information that can be processed in a given time interval. Consistent with this, there are robust correlations between reaction times (RTs) in elementary cognitive tasks and general intelligence as measured by IQ (Jensen, 1998, Nettlebeck, 1987), with higher IQs being associated with faster RTs.
In an extension of this theory to account for children’s cognitive impairments, Anderson (1992) proposed that speed of information processing is associated with general processing ability, a reflection of Spearman’s g factor, and independent of the functioning of specific abilities that are the product of modular systems (Fodor, 1983). Within Anderson’s model, developmental cognitive disorders can be characterised as domain-specific, and speed of information processing is a useful construct for differentiating between such specific disorders and those that are domain-general (e.g., Scheuffgen, Happé, Anderson, & Frith, 2000). If speed of processing is impaired in dyslexia, as some studies have suggested, this would suggest that the disorder may be the outcome of resource limitations working in tandem with other cognitive risk factors (e.g., in phonological processes). Moreover, it would pose problems for seeing dyslexia as a specific ‘modular’ disorder within the model of Anderson (1992).
The present study investigated speed of processing in children with two different language backgrounds, Italian and English. Italian has a shallow orthography in which letter–sound correspondences are consistent for reading (Cossu, 1999), whereas English has an opaque orthography with inconsistent grapheme–phoneme. It has been reported that dyslexia in Italian is associated with reading fluency deficits, whereas dyslexia in English is associated with deficits in both reading accuracy and fluency (Paulesu et al., 2001). In each language, we compared children with dyslexia, as defined by a discrepancy between reading and IQ skills, with children with reading difficulties whose functioning across different domains was generally poor, described as showing ‘borderline intellectual functioning’ (DSM-IV, 1994). Such children do not show a distinctive cognitive profile and a number of different hypotheses have been entertained concerning the causes of their learning difficulties (Bates and Stough, 1997, Bjorklund et al., 1994, Cohen and Sandberg, 1977, Swanson, 1992). We also included a second comparison group comprising typically developing readers, matched for age with the children with dyslexia; these children were assessed to provide an age-related standard for speed of information processing.
The study tested a number of alternative hypotheses. First, if dyslexia is a specific disorder, then speed of processing should be unimpaired in children with discrepancy-defined dyslexia (Anderson, 1992). On the other hand, if speed of processing deficits are risk factors for dyslexia (Pennington, 2006) it is more likely that children with dyslexia will show slower speed of processing when compared with age-matched controls (Catts et al., 2002, Nicolson and Fawcett, 1994). Second, if speed of processing is an indicator of a general processing resource (Anderson, 1992) then ‘low-IQ’ poor readers should show slower speed of information processing than children with dyslexia. Conversely, if slow speed of processing is associated with poor reading, then both groups of poor readers should be slower in speed of processing tasks than age-matched normal readers. By including the cross-linguistic comparison, the study aimed to elucidate the nature of dyslexia in shallow versus deep orthographies and to consider the extent to which children who succumb to reading difficulties in the two languages differ in basic information processing speed.
Section snippets
Participants
The participants were 111 children aged between 6;05 and 15;04 years; 58 were English and 53 were Italian. For the English sample, children with dyslexia were recruited from those diagnosed at the Centre for Reading and Language, Department of Psychology, York University. There were 20 children with dyslexia, all with IQ scores within the normal range (Full Scale IQ 87–127); their ages ranged from 7 years 5 months to 14 years 1 month. There were 17 children with borderline intellectual
Group differences on background measures according to language
Table 1 presents a summary of the performance of the three groups, shown separately for the English and the Italian samples, across tests of reading and cognitive skills. For the English sample, main effects of Group (control, dyslexia and low-IQ) on IQ measures were significant (Verbal: F(2, 57) = 37.12, p < .001; Performance: F(2, 57) = 34.74, p < .001; Full Scale: F(2, 57) = 50.74, p < .001). Post-hoc comparisons (Bonferroni) showed that children with dyslexia and typically developing children did not
Discussion
In this study, typically developing English and Italian children were compared with children with learning difficulties, either specific to reading (dyslexia) or more general (borderline intellectual functioning), on speed of information processing tasks. On simple and choice RT tasks, children in both languages with low-IQ responded more slowly than children with IQ scores within the normal range, irrespective of whether or not they were good readers. In the choice RT task, the performance of
References (53)
- et al.
Processing speed, attention, and intelligence: Effects of spatial attention on decision time in high and low-IQ subjects
Personality and Individual Differences
(1997) - et al.
Speed of lower-level auditory and visual processing as a basic factor in dyslexia: Electrophysiological evidence
Brain and Language
(2003) - et al.
Relation between intelligence and short-term memory
Cognition
(1977) IQ is related to the worst performance rule in a memory task involving children
Intelligence
(2001)- et al.
On the rate of gain of information in children
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1978) - et al.
Individual differences in general intelligence correlate with brain function during nonreasoning tasks
Intelligence
(2003) A test of Larson and Alderton’s (1990) worst performance rule of reaction time variability
Personality and Individual Differences
(1992)- et al.
Reaction time variability and intelligence: A “worst performance” analysis of individual differences
Intelligence
(1990) From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders
Cognition
(2006)- et al.
Hemispheric EEG asymmetries related to cognitive functioning in children
Intelligence and development: A cognitive theory
Developmental cognitive genetics: How psychology can inform genetics and vice versa
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Training and extension of a memory strategy: Evidence for utilization deficiencies in the acquisition of an organizational strategy in high- and low-IQ children
Child Development
Un test breve di Intelligenza: Il K-BIT [A brief intelligence test: The K-BIT]
Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata
The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Biological constraints on literacy acquisition
Reading and Writing
Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks
Annals of Dyslexia
The modularity of mind
Statistical methods for psychology
The g factor
Sources of age differences in speed of processing
Child Development
Processing time declines exponentially during childhood and adolescence
Developmental Psychology
Kaufman brief intelligence test
Trajectories of reading development; A follow-up from birth to school age of children with and without risk for dyslexia
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
Cited by (70)
Cognitive correlates of borderline intellectual functioning in borderline personality disorder
2020, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchCitation Excerpt :Additionally, pronounced impairments in BIF + compared to BIF- were found in the freedom from distractibility domain as reduced attention, lower working memory capacity, slower processing speed, and poorest performances on tasks that require verbal understanding, the ability to remember instructions, and to perform mental calculations under time pressure. Because subtle deficits in attention and auditory working memory, were found to be weaknesses of BPD independently of BIF, these dysfunctions in BIF + may be mostly related to the amount of information that can be processed in a given time interval (Bonifacci and Snowling, 2008), as well as to the arithmetic word-problem solving accuracy (Swanson and Sachse-Lee, 2001; Gathercole et al., 2006; Alloway, 2010). However, several previous studies have provided evidence of reduced attention, visuospatial working memory, and processing speed in BPD compared to healthy individuals (O'Leary et al., 1991; ; Monarch et al., 2004; Ruocco, 2005; Unoka and Richman, 2016; Thomsen et al., 2017), even when the between-group comparisons were controlled statistically for the effect of IQ (Haaland et al., 2009).
Intellectual profile in school-aged children with borderline intellectual functioning
2019, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesCitation Excerpt :Finally, BIF may have a specific profile with its own particular features. Several authors have suggested that working memory is impaired in individuals with BIF (e.g. Alloway, 2010; Bonifacci & Snowling, 2008; Maehler & Schuchardt, 2009). For example, Alloway (2010) compared children with BIF and typically-developing children matched for chronological age, and found the former had a worse performance in both verbal and visuo-spatial short-term and working memory.
Issues Related to the WISC-V Assessment of Cognitive Functioning in Clinical and Special Groups
2019, WISC-V: Clinical Use and Interpretation, Second Edition
- ☆
The work reported in this paper was conducted as part of the Ph.D. of the first author and the contribution of the second author was funded by a British Academy Research Readership. We are grateful to Silvana Contento and Gianni Brighetti for support and assistance throughout the project, and colleagues at the Centro Regionale per le Disabilità Linguistiche e Cognitive in Età Evolutiva (ASL Bologna) and Centro di Neuropsichiatria Infantile di Carpi (AUSL Modena). Importantly, we thank the schools and the children who participated in the research.