Elsevier

Clinical Nutrition

Volume 31, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages 854-861
Clinical Nutrition

Review
Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis – Clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.008Get rights and content

Summary

Background & aims

The use of phase angle (PhA) and raw parameters of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has gained attention as alternative to conventional error-prone calculation of body composition in disease. This review investigates the clinical relevance and applicability of PhA and Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) which uses the plot of resistance and reactance normalized per height.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medline identifying studies relevant to this review until March 2011. We included studies on the use of PhA or BIVA derived from tetrapolar BIA in out- and in-patient settings or institutionalized elderly.

Results

Numerous studies have proven the prognostic impact of PhA regarding mortality or postoperative complications in different clinical settings. BIVA has been shown to provide information about hydration and body cell mass and therefore allows assessment of patients in whom calculation of body composition fails due to altered hydration. Reference values exist for PhA and BIVA facilitating interpretation of data.

Conclusion

PhA, a superior prognostic marker, should be considered as a screening tool for the identification of risk patients with impaired nutritional and functional status, BIVA is recommended for further nutritional assessment and monitoring, in particular when calculation of body composition is not feasible.

Introduction

For over 25 years, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has been in use for the estimation of body composition. BIA is a portable, easy-to-use, inexpensive and non-invasive method, which can be repeated frequently and is independent of patient cooperation. It measures whole-body impedance, the opposition of the body to alternating current consisting of two components: resistance (R) and reactance (Xc). Resistance is the decrease in voltage reflecting conductivity through ionic solutions. Reactance is the delay in the flow of current measured as a phase-shift, reflecting dielectric properties, i.e., capacitance, of cell membranes and tissue interfaces.1, 2 BIA is therefore not a direct method for assessment of body composition and its accuracy as an indicator of body composition relies largely on the use of appropriate regression equations. Body composition reference methods, such as isotope dilution or dual X-ray absorptiometry, have been used to generate the dependent variable for regression models. Various empirical equations for the calculation of body composition from BIA measurements of tissue impedance and reactance have thus been developed with considerable variation in the estimated body compartments.3, 4 Moreover, homogenous composition, fixed cross-sectional area and consistent distribution of current density are necessary assumptions for the correct estimation of body composition. In healthy subjects who have no fluid imbalance, no body shape abnormalities and who are within a certain BMI range (16–34 kg/m2), BIA offers reliable information on body composition provided that suitable (i.e. age-, sex- and population-specific) equations for the calculation of body compartments are applied.5

However, these conditions are frequently violated in sick and hospitalized patients since disturbed hydration or altered distribution of extra- and intra-cellular water are often present, e.g., in liver cirrhosis, renal failure, cardiac insufficiency and obesity.6, 7, 8

Therefore, the use of raw impedance parameter has gained attention. They provide information on hydration status and body cell mass and cell integrity without algorithm-inherent errors or requiring assumptions such as constant tissue hydration. They have moreover proven to be of prognostic value in various diseases.

This review outlines the clinical applicability of the most commonly used impedance parameter, the phase angle, and the combined use of reactance and resistance normalized by height in the R/Xc Graph using Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis.

Section snippets

Phase angle

The most clinically established impedance parameter is the phase angle. It has gained popularity over the past years since it has shown to be highly predictive of impaired clinical outcome and mortality in a variety of diseases. It expresses both the amount and quality of soft tissue and can be calculated directly as its arc tangent: (Xc/R) × 180°/π. Phase angle has been suggested to be an indicator of cellular health9, 10 where higher values reflect higher cellularity, cell membrane integrity

Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for assessment and monitoring of hydration and nutritional status

The bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) approach developed by Piccoli et al.68 uses the plot of the impedance parameters resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) normalized per height as a bivariate vector in the RXc graph. The normalization for height allows for the length of the conductor and thus provides a qualitative measure of soft tissue that does not depend on body size. The position and length of the vector provides information about hydration status, body cell mass and cell

Funding

There was no funding source.

Statement of authorship

The authors' responsibilities were as follows – KN, NS: literature research and writing of the manuscript; and AB-W and MP: critical input and revision of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

No writing assistance was needed.

References (95)

  • D.A. de Luis et al.

    Influence of hormonal status and oral intake on phase angle in HIV-infected men

    Nutrition

    (2004)
  • M.C. Barbosa-Silva et al.

    Bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2005)
  • R. Buffa et al.

    Assessment of nutritional status in free-living elderly individuals by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis

    Nutrition

    (2009)
  • C. Mika et al.

    Improvement of nutritional status as assessed by multifrequency BIA during 15 weeks of refeeding in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa

    J Nutr

    (2004)
  • K. Norman et al.

    Three month intervention with protein and energy rich supplements improve muscle function and quality of life in malnourished patients with non-neoplastic gastrointestinal disease–a randomized controlled trial

    Clin Nutr

    (2008)
  • M. Nagano et al.

    The validity of bioelectrical impedance phase angle for nutritional assessment in children

    J Pediatr Surg

    (2000)
  • A. Piccoli et al.

    Impedance vector distribution by sex, race, body mass index, and age in the United States: standard reference intervals as bivariate Z scores

    Nutrition

    (2002)
  • K. Norman et al.

    Cutoff percentiles of bioelectrical phase angle predict functionality, quality of life, and mortality in patients with cancer

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2010)
  • D. Gupta et al.

    Malnutrition was associated with poor quality of life in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2006)
  • F. Dumler et al.

    Body composition analysis by bioelectrical impedance in chronic maintenance dialysis patients: comparisons to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III

    J Ren Nutr

    (2003)
  • M. Coors et al.

    Acute phase response and energy balance in stable human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a doubly labeled water study

    J Lab Clin Med

    (2001)
  • R. Silva-Tinoco et al.

    Developing thyroid disorders is associated with poor prognosis factors in patient with stable chronic heart failure

    Int J Cardiol

    (2011)
  • H.S. Wong et al.

    Body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in renal transplant recipients

    Transplant Proc

    (2004)
  • D. Gupta et al.

    Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2004)
  • S. Toso et al.

    Altered tissue electric properties in lung cancer patients as detected by bioelectric impedance vector analysis

    Nutrition

    (2000)
  • A. Schwenk et al.

    Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis remains an independent predictive marker in HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2000)
  • R. Mushnick et al.

    Relationship of bioelectrical impedance parameters to nutrition and survival in peritoneal dialysis patients

    Kidney Int Suppl

    (2003)
  • M.C. Barbosa-Silva et al.

    Bioelectric impedance and individual characteristics as prognostic factors for post-operative complications

    Clin Nutr

    (2005)
  • A. Piccoli et al.

    A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: the RXc graph

    Kidney Int

    (1994)
  • S. Toso et al.

    Bioimpedance vector pattern in cancer patients without disease versus locally advanced or disseminated disease

    Nutrition

    (2003)
  • A. Piccoli et al.

    Bioimpedance vector migration up to three days after the hemodialysis session

    Kidney Int

    (2004)
  • V. Jha et al.

    Body composition analysis with bioelectric impedance in adult Indians with ESRD: comparison with healthy population

    Kidney Int

    (2006)
  • A. Piccoli

    Bioelectric impedance vector distribution in peritoneal dialysis patients with different hydration status

    Kidney Int

    (2004)
  • A. Piccoli et al.

    Reference values of the bioelectrical impedance vector in neonates in the first week after birth

    Nutrition

    (2002)
  • A. Bosy-Westphal et al.

    Patterns of bioelectrical impedance vector distribution by body mass index and age: implications for body-composition analysis

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2005)
  • U.G. Kyle et al.

    Bioelectrical impedance analysis–part I: review of principles and methods

    Clin Nutr

    (2004)
  • L. Valentini et al.

    Association between intestinal tight junction permeability and whole-body electrical resistance in healthy individuals: a hypothesis

    Nutrition

    (2009)
  • L. Pillon et al.

    Vector length as a proxy for the adequacy of ultrafiltration in hemodialysis

    Kidney Int

    (2004)
  • H.C. Lukaski et al.

    Assessment of change in hydration in women during pregnancy and postpartum with bioelectrical impedance vectors

    Nutrition

    (2007)
  • R. Buffa et al.

    Migration of the bioelectrical impedance vector in healthy elderly subjects

    Nutrition

    (2003)
  • R. Buffa et al.

    Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis detects low body cell mass and dehydration in patients with Alzheimer's disease

    J Nutr Health Aging

    (2010)
  • F. Santomauro et al.

    Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis and mini nutritional assessment in elderly nursing home residents

    J Nutr Health Aging

    (2011)
  • K. Norman et al.

    Bioimpedance vector analysis as a measure of muscle function

    Clin Nutr

    (2009)
  • M.M. Avram et al.

    Malnutrition and inflammation as predictors of mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients

    Kidney Int

    (2006)
  • G. Chertow et al.

    Phase angle predicts survival in hemodialysis patients

    J Ren Nutr

    (1997)
  • R. Wirth et al.

    Bioelectric impedance phase angle is associated with hospital mortality of geriatric patients

    Arch Gerontol Geriatr

    (2010)
  • J. Nyboer et al.

    The electrical impedance plethysmograph an electrical volume recorder

    (1943)
  • Cited by (651)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text