Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 77, Issue 5, October 2009, Pages 640-651
Chemosphere

Evaluation of background exposures of Americans to dioxin-like compounds in the 1990s and the 2000s

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.016Get rights and content

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency’s 2004 Dioxin Reassessment included a characterization of background exposures to dioxin-like compounds, including an estimate of an average background intake dose and an average background body burden. These quantities were derived from data generated in the mid-1990s. Studies conducted in the 2000s were gathered in an attempt to update the estimates generated by the Reassessment. While these studies suggest declines in the average background dose and body burden, a precise quantification of this decline, much less a conclusion that a decline has indeed occurred, cannot be made because of the inconsistency of study design and data sources, and the treatment of non-detects in the generation of congener average concentrations. The average background intake of the Reassessment was 61.0 pg TEQ/day, and using more current data, the average background intake was 40.6 pg TEQ/day. The average body burden from the surveys in the mid-1990s was 22.9 pg TEQ/g lipid weight (pg/g lwt). More recent blood concentration data, from NHANES 2001/2, suggest an adult average at 21.7 pg/g TEQ lwt. These TEQ values include the 17 dioxin and furan congeners and 3 coplanar PCBs, and were generated substituting ND = ½ DL or ND = DL/sq rt (2). Results are provided for ND = 0 and analyses conducted to evaluate the impacts of this substitution. A more detailed examination of beef and pork data from similarly designed national statistical surveys show that declines in pork are statistically significant while the beef concentrations appeared to have remained constant between the time periods.

Introduction

In April 1991, the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began a scientific reassessment of the health risks of exposure to 2378-TCDD and dioxin-like compounds (hereafter referred to as the Reassessment). This effort has resulted in a comprehensive multi-volume assessment report (US EPA, 2003a), which was reviewed by the EPA’s Science Advisory Board in 1994 and 2000, and by the National Academies of Science (NAS) beginning in 2004 and concluding in 2006 (NAS, 2006). To date, EPA has not finalized the Reassessment; the NAS review draft (US EPA, 2003a) is the most current draft of the Reassessment. The characterization of background exposures to dioxin-like compounds in the Reassessment included an estimate of a background intake dose, expressed in pg Toxic Equivalent (TEQ)/day or pg TEQ/kg body weight/day, and a body burden, expressed in pg TEQ/g lipid weight (pg/g lwt), or pg TEQ/g whole weight (pg/g wwt), representative of the general population of the US. While information was provided on childhood exposures and exposures to special populations, this update focuses on the background adult exposure estimates provided in the Reassessment.

The NAS Review Draft (US EPA, 2003a) of the Reassessment provided these estimates: the background daily dose was 65.8 pg TEQ/day (42.7 pg of dioxin/furan, or PCDD/PCDF, TEQ and 23.1 pg coplanar PCB TEQ) and the background body burden was provided as 25.4 pg TEQ/g lipid (20.1 pg/g of PCDD/PCDF TEQ and 5.3 pg/g coplanar PCB TEQ). These estimates were developed as arithmetic averages using data generated during the middle 1990s. Congener averages and resulting TEQ concentrations were derived assuming non-detects were equal to one-half the detection limit (ND = ½ DL). These estimates also were derived using the World Health Organization (WHO) 1998 Toxic Equivalency Factor (TEF) scheme (Van den Berg et al., 1998). To avoid confusion, all TEQ values in this study were derived using the WHO-2005 TEFs (Van den Berg et al., 2006). In addition to a rederivation based on a different TEF scheme, these NAS Review Draft estimates were re-derived assuming non-detects are equal to zero (ND = 0).

The purpose of this study is twofold: to provide updated estimates of dose and body burden of dioxin-like compounds, using data collected between 2000 and 2004, and to examine the data more closely to determine whether declines have occurred. This examination highlights the disparity in study design, data sources, and laboratories conducting the trace analyses for the background food samples and blood. These updated dose and body burdens are derived in a manner that is as analogous as possible to the mid-1990s estimates of the Reassessment, so that comparisons of the two sets of estimates can be meaningful. Current estimates will be derived using both substitution methods, ND = ½ DL and ND = 0. The update on the intake dose will use more recent data on PCDD/PCDFs and PCBs in food. The body burden data from the Reassessment included six different regional studies of PCDD/PCDFs and PCBs in background populations, and this will be updated using the more valid national, statistical survey known as the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, or NHANES. Statistically based, national averages of congener concentrations in blood were derived from individuals within the 2001/2 NHANES data set, and these averages were derived at ND = 0 and ND = DL/√2.

In addition to these substitutions, a variation is to substitute non-detects with the detection limit (ND = DL), or even more rigorously, to statistically extrapolate below the detection limit based on the distribution of the population above the detection limit. While arguments can be presented for adoption of any of the substitution methods, the Reassessment concluded that the background characterizations were best generated at ND = ½ DL. That is used here for generation of intake doses, although the available analysis of NHANES data used the alternative, ND = DL/√2. If the analytical detection limits are sufficiently low and/or quantifications are possible for a large majority of congener measurements in a population, then average congener concentrations calculated at ND = 0 and any of the other substitution methods will be similar. On the other hand, a meaningful disparity in congener averages (or other statistical measures, for that matter) at ND = 0 versus one of the other methods suggests that the detection limits may be too high for the matrix being studied. For example, if 2378-TCDD (the most toxic congener) is not detected frequently (as is often the case), then the TEQ concentration can be heavily influenced by which substitution method is used for non-detects for 2378-TCDD. A primary focus of this study is to evaluate the impact of the substitution method on the generation of survey average congener and TEQ concentrations, and the subsequent impact to the background characterizations of dioxin dose and body burden.

It is noted that the focus of this evaluation is on TEQ and not on the individual congeners which comprise the TEQ. Such an analysis could mask different trends in the exposure to individual congeners.

Section snippets

Methods

In the Reassessment, dose estimates were provided for inhalation, soil ingestion, soil dermal contact, water ingestion, and for 10 food ingestion categories including beef, pork, poultry, “other meats” (game, lamb, unidentified meat in casseroles, etc.), eggs, milk, dairy, marine fish, freshwater fish, and vegetable oils. Each pathway estimate was derived as a point estimate using an arithmetic average adult per capita contact rate (i.e., inhalation rate, water ingestion rate, food ingestion

Food ingestion rates

The beef/pork/poultry/dairy/milk ingestion rates in the Reassessment were mean adult per capita ingestion rates taken from EPA’s 1997 Exposure Factors Handbook (EFH; US EPA, 1997), and rates in that guidance were developed from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Continuing Survey of Food Intakes among Individuals (CSFII) 1-day 1989–1991 survey. EPA has now analyzed the CSFII 2-day 1994–1996 surveys (US EPA, 2003b) but arrives at essentially the same food consumption rates

Summary and conclusions

This study attempts to provide an update to the background body burden and intake dose estimates described in EPA’s Reassessment (US EPA, 2003a). These estimates were current as of the mid-1990s and the updates are current as of the early 2000s. Besides simply updating the exposure estimates, this study examines the data to ascertain whether a decline in exposures has occurred during this time. Using the same procedures and analogous data when available, the intake dose calculated at 61.0 pg 

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency, the Centers for Disease Control, and the US Department of Agriculture. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the data on NHANES 2001/2002 supplied by Laura Scott (formerly Laura Ferriby of Ferriby et al., 2007) of Chemrisk (10375 Richmond Avenue, Suite 350, Houston, TX 77042). We are also appreciative of the careful reviews provided by EPA reviewers David Cleverly, John Schaum, and Joseph Ferrario.

References (31)

  • D.G. Hayward et al.

    PCDD and PCDF levels in baby food made from chicken produced before and after 1997 in the United States

    Organohalogen Compounds

    (2000)
  • M.K. Hoffman et al.

    Statistically designed survey of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and co-planar polychlorinated biphenyls in US meat and poultry, 2002–2003: results, trends, and implications

    Environmental Science and Technology

    (2006)
  • E. Jensen et al.

    Exposure assessment of dioxins/furans consumed in dairy foods and fish

    Food Additives and Contaminants

    (2001)
  • Klein, R.J., Schoenborn, C.A., 2001. Age Adjustment Using the 2000 Projected US Population. Statistical Notes, Number...
  • J.S. Lakind et al.

    Perspective on serum dioxin levels in the United States: an evaluation of the NHANES data

    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Dioxin-like compounds in paired maternal serum and breast milk under long sampling intervals

      2020, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
      Citation Excerpt :

      Significant declines of PCDD/Fs in serum were observed worldwide during 1985–2008 (Consonni et al., 2012). In recent years, levels of dioxin-like compounds in serum of people from several industrial countries or regions, such as the United States (Lorber et al., 2009), German (Fromme et al., 2016), Japan (Konishi et al., 2009; Kishi et al., 2017), and Taiwan (Hsu et al., 2009), were reported. This information helped us to assess changes in body burden of dioxin-like compounds in general population.

    • Chemical Contamination of Red Meat

      2017, Chemical Contaminants and Residues in Food: Second Edition
    • Comparison of industrial emissions and carpet dust concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in a multi-center U.S. study

      2017, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The predominant PCDD/F exposure pathway in the general population is considered dietary ingestion of animal products, which accumulate the lipophilic PCDD/F compounds (Dougherty et al., 2000, U.S. EPA, 1994, USDA, 2015, Charnley and Doull, 2005). Non-dietary exposure pathways, such as non-dietary ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact of indoor dust, have received relatively little attention, as they are estimated to contribute < 10% of total exposure in the U.S. general population (Lorber et al., 2009). However, exposures from dust could be important contributors to total PCDD/F exposures in certain populations, such as those living in close proximity to PCDD/F-emitting sources, those who do not consume a lot of animal products, those who spend a lot of time at home, or children who spend a large portion of time on the floor and exhibit hand-to-mouth contact (Tue et al., 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text