Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 65, December 2016, Pages 560-566
Computers in Human Behavior

Review
The effect of internet use on well-being: Meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The effect of internet use on well-being was examined.

  • Internet use has a significant effect on well-being.

  • Well-being components are not significant moderator variables.

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis study was to investigate the effect of internet use on the components of well-being. Life satisfaction, well-being and self-esteem were evaluated as markers of well-being and their interaction with internet use was assessed. Publications in the literature were collated (N = 281) by investigating articles related to the topic. In light of criteria determined by the researcher, 23 studies were included in the analysis. This study comprised a sample group of 21,054 individuals. The mean age of the sample group was calculated as 20.32 years. According to the results of the analysis using the random effect model, internet use has a significant effect on well-being at low levels (k = 28, r = −0.18, p < 0.001). The components of well-being were used as moderator variables. Results of moderator analysis showed that the well-being components were not significant moderator variables of the effect of internet use on well-being (Qb = 1.34, df = 2, p > 0.05). According to the results of the research, internet use is an effective variable on well-being. The results are discussed in light of the literature.

Introduction

Over the last fifteen years, internet use has increased globally and it is known that nearly half of the global population uses the internet (Internet World Stats, 2016). The internet provides convenience for people in a variety of ways from communication to shopping and makes access to these opportunities easier (Caplan, 2007). It appears impossible that this phenomenon has not affected our lives. The result of excess time spent on qualitatively low activities in virtual environments has caused changes in the psychosocial behavior of individuals, leading to the definition of healthy and pathological internet use. Accordingly, healthy internet use is the use of the internet within a determined time interval with a specific aim (Davis, 2001). Additionally, problematic internet use, conceptualized as pathological, problematic or compulsive internet use, is defined as a multi-dimensional syndrome negatively affecting the social, psychological and professional life of the individual (Caplan, 2005). Problems such as depression, anxiety, stress, loneliness and insomnia may accompany problematic internet use. The interaction between well-being and problematic internet use has attracted, and continues to attract, the attention of researchers. When research findings are investigated, it is easily understood that problematic internet use negatively affects the well-being of the individual (Mei et al., 2016, Zhang, 2015). However, some research results have shown that problematic internet use has a direct correlation with well-being. As a result, there is no overlap between studies (Heo, Chun, Lee, Lee, & Kim, 2015). Huang (2010), moving from this idea, brought together studies investigating the correlation between internet use and well-being in a meta-analysis study. According to the results obtained, there was a low level correlation between internet use and well-being (r = −0.03). This study may be assessed as the next stage in a relay race. Beginning where Huang (2010) left off, a meta-analysis study was designed evaluating the studies on internet use and well-being.

The World Health Organization brings personal development and potential to the forefront in its definition of health, promoting positive psychology. Health is the full experience of wellness of the individual physically, mentally and socially, without disease or disability (WHO, 1946). Though the importance of well-being had been stated previously, studies in this area (positive psychology) began after the 1960s, (e.g., life satisfaction; Neugarten, Havighurst, & Tobin, 1961). Positive psychology focuses on how people may develop their positive competencies over their lifetime. As a result, a belief developed that people should live with a high proportion of positivity in their lives (Peterson, 2000, Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi, 2000).

Currently many parameters like happiness, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, psychological well-being and optimism are among the study areas of positive psychology (Hefferon & Boniwell, 2010). In this study the well-being indicators of life satisfaction, psychological well-being and self-esteem were evaluated. For the whole of history, processes adding meaning to human life and allowing satisfaction to be gained from previous experiences have been researched. Happiness is a construct that has been much focused on and continually investigated for many years (Diener, 2000). The most general form of happiness is correlated with subjective well-being. Subjective well-being is assessed under the hedonic dimension of well-being. Accordingly, subjective well-being is an assessment of their own life by the individual in terms of obtaining satisfaction (hedonic-pleasure principle) (Ryan & Deci, 2001). This assessment has both cognitive and emotional dimensions. While positive and negative emotions form the emotional dimension; life satisfaction is part of the cognitive dimension. Life satisfaction is the perception of satisfaction toward life as a whole (Diener and Diener, 1996, Pavot and Diener, 1993). In light of these conceptual outcomes, life satisfaction may be defined as aspects in the life of an individual ensuring hedonic satisfaction. In other words, a narrow distance between what the individual wants to obtain and their hedonic gains indicates high life satisfaction.

Psychological well-being develops on the basis of the eudaimonic dimension of well-being. Psychological well-being is related to the interaction between the meaning an individual gives to life and the route to realization of this meaning as a whole (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Ryff (1989) differentiates psychological well-being from subjective well-being. In this way, a Multi-dimensional Psychological Well-Being model was developed. This model emphasizes the optimal effort shown by an individual to use their potential and achieve perfection (Ryff, 1995). Psychological well-being deals with the potential of the individual to enter interactions with others using abilities and communication skills and the responsibilities of all these processes in terms of life aims (Ryff & Keyes, 1995).

Self-esteem is the last component of well-being used in this study. Self-esteem is a comprehensive evaluation comprising cognitive and behavioral aspects of the self (Mruk, 2006). As a result of this evaluation, the individual makes positive and negative judgments about their concept of self, thus affecting self-esteem. Self-esteem is evaluated as a developmental phenomenon and is known to vary during different stages of life and in light of situations and events (Lubow, 2009). Rosenberg (1965) defined self-esteem as the positive and negative attitudes of the individual towards themselves. Self-esteem comprises all internal beliefs of the individual about themselves. In other words, self-esteem is all of the values the individual attributes to themselves (Guindon, 2010).

The cognitive behavioral approach may be used to explain the development of problematic internet use. According to this approach, irrational cognition related to self and the world may cause problematic internet use (Senol-Durak & Durak, 2011). In this way irrational cognition is added to dysfunctional behavior displayed by the individual and so internet use may be a way for the individual to avoid psychological problems. At the end of this process, generally problematic internet use is encountered (Caplan, 2002). This problem, rapidly expanding and affecting human lives, causes negative results in many areas (Odacı, 2013). Problematic internet use is reported to directly affect well-being (Ang et al., 2012, Berber-Çelik et al., 2015, Bozoglan et al., 2013, Mitchell et al., 2011, Odacı and Çıkrıkçı, 2014, Zhang, 2015). For example, while problematic internet use negatively affects well-being (Lachmann et al., 2016, Nie et al., 2015); it may positively affect depression causing an increase in depressive symptoms (Lai et al., 2015, Ostovar et al., 2016).

Taking note of the research, when the correlation between problematic internet use and the components of well-being are investigated, many studies are found. These studies vary in terms of quantity and quality of the correlations between problematic internet use and well-being. The first meta-analysis study based on the correlation between internet use and well-being was completed by Huang (2010). In the last five years, the intense inclusion of technology and the internet into our lives is thought to have caused an increase in problematic internet use. In parallel with this increase, it is proposed that well-being levels of individuals will decrease according to internet use. This meta-analysis study evaluated the effect of problematic internet use on well-being. Additionally, well-being components (life satisfaction, psychological well-being, self-esteem) thought to affect the size of the effect were assessed as moderator variables. To achieve the aims of the research two hypotheses were tested:

H1

Problematic internet use has a negative effect on well-being.

H2

The components of well-being are moderators of the negative effect of problematic internet use on well-being.

Section snippets

Study design

This study explored the effect of internet use on well-being using the method of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis, which combines the results of many independent studies on a certain topic, is a method of statistically analyzing the obtained research findings (Littel, Corcoran, & Pillai, 2008).

Study eligibility criteria

To determine which research would be included in the meta-analysis, initially a literature review of the Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar academic databases was performed. As there were many definitions

Internet use and well-being

The results showed a negative relationship between internet use and well-being, supporting the H1 hypothesis (Table 3). The effect size of internet use on well-being was significant (r = −0.18, p < 0.01; 95% CI [−0.28, −.07]). This value shows that internet use has a low (seeCohen, 1988) effect on well-being.

Moderating role of well-being components

Moderator analysis did not support the H2 hypothesis that the well-being components used in the research played a moderator role in the effect levels of internet use on well-being (Table 4

Discussion

In this study, a meta-analytic approach was used to determine the effect of internet use on well-being. Thus a general evaluation of findings obtained from studies researching the correlation between problematic internet use and well-being was performed. Within the research, the components of well-being were assessed as moderator variables of the effect of problematic internet use on well-being. The results were that problematic internet use had a negative and significant effect on well-being

Limitations and recommendations

As with all studies, this study has some limitations. The first limitation may be the components of well-being included in the study. In addition to the components of life satisfaction, psychological well-being and self-esteem used in this meta-analysis, other well-being components (depression, loneliness, anxiety, optimism, happiness, etc.) could have been included in the study. The second limitation involves the databases chosen. More advanced studies may be completed by screening different

References (70)

  • H. Odacı et al.

    Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2014)
  • S. Park et al.

    Social relationship on problematic internet use (PIU) among adolescents in South Korea: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and self-control

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2014)
  • B. Schyns et al.

    How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes

    The Leadership Quarterly

    (2013)
  • M.H. Selfhout et al.

    Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: The role of perceived friendship quality

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2009)
  • A. Akın et al.

    Internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress

    International Online Journal of Educational Sciences

    (2011)
  • T. Ayas et al.

    Relation between depression, loneliness, self-esteem and internet addiction

    Education

    (2013)
  • B. Aydın et al.

    Internet addiction among adolescents: The role of self-esteem

    Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences

    (2011)
  • A.T. Beck

    Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders

    (1976)
  • Ç. Berber-Çelik et al.

    The predictive role of self-esteem and self-perception on problematic internet use

    e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy

    (2012)
  • Ç. Berber-Çelik et al.

    Is problematic internet use an indicator of eating disorders among Turkish university students?

    Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity

    (2015)
  • M. Borenstein et al.

    Introduction to meta-analysis

    (2009)
  • B. Bozoglan et al.

    Loneliness, self-esteem, and life satisfaction as predictors of internet addiction: A cross-sectional study among Turkish university students

    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

    (2013)
  • E. Budak et al.

    Relationship between internet addiction, psychopathology and self-esteem among university students

    The European Research Journal

    (2015)
  • S.E. Caplan

    A social skill account of problematic internet use

    Journal of Communication

    (2005)
  • S.E. Caplan

    Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use

    CyberPsychology & Behavior

    (2007)
  • M. Cardak

    Psychological well-being and Internet addiction among university students

    TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

    (2013)
  • S. Casale et al.

    The association between psychological well-being and problematic use of internet communicative services among young people

    The Journal of Psychology

    (2015)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • V. Demirer et al.

    Preservice teachers' internet addiction in terms of gender, internet access, loneliness and life satisfaction

    International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology

    (2013)
  • E. Diener

    Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index

    American Psychologist

    (2000)
  • E. Diener et al.

    Most people are happy

    Psychological Science

    (1996)
  • E. Diener et al.

    Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts

    Journal of Happiness Studies

    (2000)
  • A. Eryılmaz

    Satisfaction of needs and determining of life goals: A model of subjective well-being for adolescents in high school

    Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice

    (2011)
  • G. Fioravanti et al.

    Adolescent Internet addiction: Testing the association between self-esteem, the perception of Internet attributes, and preference for online social interactions

    CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

    (2012)
  • M.H. Guindon

    What is self-esteem?

  • Cited by (0)

    Note: References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

    View full text