Elsevier

Critical Care Clinics

Volume 24, Issue 4, October 2008, Pages 737-765
Critical Care Clinics

Neurobehavioral Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in the Critical Care Setting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2008.06.001Get rights and content

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in approximately 230,000 hospitalizations annually in the United States. Advances in the acute management of TBI have improved survival after TBI. Many TBI survivors develop neurobehavioral disturbances in the acute post-injury period. Neurobehavioral sequelae present clinical management challenges for critical care professionals. This article defines and describes TBI and reviews its common neuroanatomic and neurobehavioral consequences. These disturbances are organized under the framework of posttraumatic encephalopathy, and the characteristic forms and stages of recovery of this condition are discussed. Recommendations regarding evaluation and management of posttraumatic neurobehavioral problems in the critical care setting are offered.

Section snippets

General clinical case definition

Consistent with the Guidelines for Surveillance of Central Nervous System Injury developed by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [15], TBI is defined as a functionally significant disruption of brain function manifested as immediately apparent cognitive or physical impairments that result from blunt or penetrating trauma or rapid acceleration or deceleration forces. This definition excludes lacerations or contusions of the face, eye, or scalp, and fractures of facial

Neurobiology of traumatic brain injury

Developing a rational approach to the neurobehavioral management of persons who have TBI in the critical care setting requires familiarity with the neuroanatomy and neurochemistry of this condition. As described later in this section, the neurobiology of TBI not only predicts the neurobehavioral problems that arise commonly in the early postinjury period but also informs treatment selection (agents to use and those that are best avoided). The neurobiological bases of TBI are grouped broadly

Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury in the critical care setting

The biomechanical and cytotoxic processes induced by severe TBI disproportionately affect the anterior and ventral aspects of the frontal and temporal lobes, medial frontal and temporal areas, ventral forebrain, the diencephalon (thalamus and hypothalamus), the rostral and ventral areas of the upper brainstem, and the white matter within and between these areas [44], [56], [57], [60], [75], [106], [107], [108]. These are neurobehaviorally salient areas, and their injury results in predictable

General considerations

A comprehensive assessment of the patient, including identification of relevant pre-injury medical, neurologic, psychiatric, and substance histories and thorough neurologic and neurobehavioral examinations are prerequisites to the evaluation and treatment of posttraumatic neurobehavioral disturbances. Comprehensive and ongoing neurologic and medical evaluation is standard care in the CCU, the guidelines for which are described elsewhere [85] and form the foundation on which subsequent

Treatment of posttraumatic neurobehavioral disturbances

The selection of treatments for posttraumatic neurobehavioral disturbances is best guided by the published literature specific to TBI. As discussed previously, some agents (eg, haloperidol and benzodiazepines) used routinely in the management of other critically ill patients may not be well suited for use in this population. Unfortunately, the majority of the treatment literature regarding posttraumatic neurobehavioral disturbances consists of open-label case series, single case reports, and

Summary

TBI is a significant public health problem and individuals who have TBI commonly are encountered in critical care settings. The biomechanics of a typical brain injury result in a predictable injury profile that often involves frontal and temporal cortex, cerebral white matter, diencephalic, and mesencephalic-brainstem areas. Damage to these regions is associated with a constellation of neurobehavioral sequelae, including altered arousal, impaired cognition, agitation, and impairment of impulse

References (146)

  • M. Sherer et al.

    Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: findings from the TBI model systems

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2002)
  • A.A. Sabet et al.

    Deformation of the human brain induced by mild angular head acceleration

    J Biomech

    (2008)
  • J.C. Misra et al.

    A study of rotational brain injury

    J Biomech

    (1984)
  • S.S. Margulies et al.

    Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate

    J Biomech

    (1990)
  • J.M. Meythaler et al.

    Current concepts: diffuse axonal injury-associated traumatic brain injury

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2001)
  • E.D. Bigler

    Neurobiology and neuropathology underlie the neuropsychological deficits associated with traumatic brain injury

    Arch Clin Neuropsychol

    (2003)
  • H.M. Pappius

    Involvement of indoleamines in functional disturbances after brain injury

    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • L.B. Goldstein

    Neurotransmitters and motor activity: effects on functional recovery after brain injury

    NeuroRx

    (2006)
  • L.B. Goldstein

    Effects of amphetamines and small related molecules on recovery after stroke in animals and man

    Neuropharmacology

    (2000)
  • U.J. Bogdanovitch et al.

    The use of cholinesterase in severe head injury

    Resuscitation

    (1975)
  • N.A. Sayer et al.

    Characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes among patients with blast and other injuries sustained during the global war on terror

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2008)
  • M.A. Mayorga

    The pathology of primary blast overpressure injury

    Toxicology

    (1997)
  • Y.Y. Phillips

    Primary blast injuries

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1986)
  • D. Thurman et al.

    Trends in hospitalization associated with traumatic brain injury

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • D.J. Thurman et al.

    Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1999)
  • H.S. Levin

    Neurobehavioral outcome of closed head injury: implications for clinical trials

    J Neurotrauma

    (1995)
  • H.S. Levin et al.

    Neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after severe head injury. Experience of the traumatic coma data bank

    J Neurosurg

    (1990)
  • M. Rapoport et al.

    The role of injury severity in neurobehavioral outcome 3 months after traumatic brain injury

    Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol

    (2002)
  • Marr AL, Coronado VG. Central Nervous System Injury Surveillance Data Submission Standards - 2002. Atlanta, GA,...
  • H.H. Kaufman et al.

    Neurobehavioral outcome after gunshot wounds to the head in adult civilians and children

    Neurosurgery

    (1985)
  • S. Dikmen et al.

    Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury

    J Neurotrauma

    (2001)
  • J.N. Doctor et al.

    Workers' risk of unemployment after traumatic brain injury: a normed comparison

    J Int Neuropsychol Soc

    (2005)
  • T.L. Swift et al.

    Misconceptions about brain injury among the general public and non-expert health professionals: an exploratory study

    Brain Inj

    (2001)
  • A.L. Marr et al.

    Central nervous system injury surveillance data submission standards—2002

    (2002)
  • J.J. Johnston

    The galasko report implemented: the role of emergency medicine in the management of head injuries

    Eur J Emerg Med

    (2007)
  • J. Borg et al.

    Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury

    J Rehabil Med

    (2004 February)
  • B.J. Gabbe et al.

    The status of the Glasgow coma scale

    Emerg Med (Fremantle)

    (2003)
  • G.L. Clifton et al.

    Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: report of a conference

    Neurosurgery

    (1992)
  • D.H. Williams et al.

    Mild head injury classification

    Neurosurgery

    (1990)
  • J. van der Naalt et al.

    Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in mild to moderate head injury: early and late imaging related to outcome

    Ann Neurol

    (1999)
  • H.S. Levin et al.

    The galveston orientation and amnesia test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (1979)
  • N. Marrosszeky et al.

    The PTA protocol. Guidelines for using the westmead post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) scale

    (1998)
  • R.L. Tate et al.

    Predicting duration of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) from early PTA measurements

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (2001)
  • W.T. Jackson et al.

    Effective serial measurement of cognitive orientation in rehabilitation: the orientation log

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1998)
  • T.A. Novack et al.

    Validity of the orientation log, relative to the galveston orientation and amnesia test

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (2000)
  • K.L. Frey et al.

    Comparison of the O-Log and GOAT as measures of posttraumatic amnesia

    Brain Inj

    (2007)
  • T. Kay et al.

    Definition of mild traumatic brain injury: report from the mild traumatic brain injury committee of the head injury interdisciplinary special interest group of the American congress of rehabilitation medicine

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1993)
  • W.R. Russell et al.

    Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury

    Arch Neurol

    (1961)
  • D.I. Katz et al.

    Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation

    Arch Neurol

    (1994)
  • J.H. Ellenberg et al.

    Posttraumatic amnesia as a predictor of outcome after severe closed head injury. Prospective assessment

    Arch Neurol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Alterations to the gut microbiome after sport-related concussion in a collegiate football players cohort: A pilot study

      2022, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity - Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, changes in the gut microbiota (or dysbiosis) have previously been correlated with developing certain diseases, including neuropsychiatric disease (Cenit et al., 2017). Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota has been described in patients with chronic severe TBI (Arciniegas and McAllister, 2008; McAllister, 2008) and is related to alterations in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and microglia activation (Hoban et al., 2018), as well as changes in the microbiome composition (Treangen et al., 2018). Although gut dysbiosis after a single, severe TBI has been documented, this has not yet been studied in SRC or associated with subconcussive hits in athletes exposed to repetitive head impacts.

    • Neurobehavioral Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in the Critical Care Setting: An Update

      2017, Critical Care Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, neurobehavioral disturbances after injury may also manifest in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU).2 Whereas previous authors have described a broad range of psychiatric disorders after TBI, including depression, mania, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol use disorder, and personality changes,3 as well as cognitive, behavioral, and somatic complaints,4,5 only few have discussed post-traumatic encephalopathy (PTE) and neurobehavioral presentations specifically in the critical care setting.2,6 Thus, this article will discuss the updates in the epidemiology, definition and classification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of common acute neuropsychiatric sequelae of TBI that the critical care specialist may encounter.

    • Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol After Traumatic Brain Injury

      2014, Psychiatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Emotional dyscontrol (which, for the purposes of this article, refers to pathologic laughing and crying, affective lability, and irritability) as well as behavioral dyscontrol (here denoting disinhibition and aggression) are challenging for persons with TBI, their families and caregivers, and health care professionals serving to understand and address these conditions.3–9 In the early period following TBI, emotional and behavioral disturbances may be symptoms of posttraumatic encephalopathy (reflecting neurotrauma-induced diffuse brain dysfunction)10–16 and/or manifestations of focal injuries to brain systems subserving emotional regulation and comportment.10–16 These disturbances are especially common among individuals whose initial injuries are severe enough to require hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation.10,11,15,16

    • Brain Trauma: Intensive Care Unit Management

      2014, Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences
    • Clinical electrophysiologic assessments and mild traumatic brain injury: State-of-the-science and implications for clinical practice

      2011, International Journal of Psychophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This type of evaluation also is a pre-requisite to any clinical electrophysiologic assessment and findings from it are needed to interpret meaningfully findings from electrophysiologic assessments. In general, conventional elements of the neuropsychiatric workup include complete history through interview and examination of all medical records; general and cognitive mental status examinations; elementary neurological examination; conventional neuroimaging (preferably using MRI, inclusive of T1-weighted, T2* gradient recall echo [T2*GRE], fluid attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], and diffusion weighted imaging [DWI] sequences); and neuropsychological testing including, in particular, effort testing/symptom validity metrics (Arciniegas et al., 2005; Arciniegas and McAllister, 2008; Silver et al., 2009). When the history and examination identify depressive, anxious, or other psychiatric symptoms, use of standard metrics for which normative data are available to ascertain their scope and severity is encouraged.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grants RO1 NS40472-01, RO1 HD048176-01, RO1 NS055020, and R01HD48638), the New Hampshire Hospital, the Ira DeCamp Foundation, and HealthONE Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital.

    View full text