Geographical analysis of socioeconomic factors in risk of domestic burn injury in London 2007–2013
Introduction
Burn injuries represent a significant health burden in the United Kingdom. Every year, there are 18.1 burn injuries per 100,000 population resulting in hospitalisation [1]. Serious burn injuries leading to death, or hospitalisation for more than 72 h, occurred in 4.7 cases per 100,000 population annually, contributing to 5.4% of all serious traumatic injuries [1]. Burn injuries are associated with a significant risk of mortality [2], as well as significant physical, functional and psychiatric sequelae in survivors. The economic costs to the health service are also substantial, with the cost of short-term care for a hot drink scald estimated at £1850, and the cost of a major paediatric burn estimated at £63,157. Given the significant costs of burn injuries to the individual and society, the potential benefit of targeted community-based preventative strategies [3] is of crucial importance in preventing burns morbidity and mortality.
The majority of burn injuries occur in the victims’ own homes [4]. Previous studies worldwide have identified significant geographic clustering of burn injuries [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], suggesting that there may be common characteristics in the resident communities that potentially pre-dispose them to burn injuries. Age [10], socioeconomic deprivation [7], [9], [10], [11], [12], ethnicity [10], [12], education status [11], [12], [13], adult employment status[12], living environment [7], household structure such as lone parent households [14] and large family size [15], as well as pre-existing disabilities [16], [17], have all been implicated in the incidence and risk of burn injuries.
In the 2011 Census of the United Kingdom population, the Greater London metropolitan area is officially the most populous city in Europe, with a population of approximately 8 million [18]. There is evidence of widespread variation in unintentional injury rates across London attributable to socioeconomic factors [19], [20], [21], [22]. However, there have not been any studies of population burn injury rates or risk in London.
This study aims to explore the geographical distribution of burn injuries in Greater London and the association of socioeconomic factors in areas at risk.
Section snippets
Data collection
The International Burn Injury Database (iBID1), incorporating the UK National Burn Injury Database (UK.NBID2), was created in 2004 [4]. This was achieved with funding from the UK National Burn Care Group (NBCG3) following the UK National Burn Care Review in 2001, with the purpose of matching the demand for burn care across a range of ages, burn injury severity and geographical
Results
There were a total of 2911 admissions to specialised burns services in Greater London in the 7-year study period. 2100 (72.1%) cases were classified as occurring in the patients’ own homes. There were 1028 paediatric (age 0–14 years) and 1071 adult (≥15 years) domestic burn injuries. The detailed characteristics of domestic burn injury cases are presented in Table 1. There were a total of 1157 males and 929 females, with gender not having been recorded in 14 cases. The median percentage of
Discussion
In our study, we found more patients admitted to burns services with burn injuries to be in the most socioeconomically deprived brackets, which is consistent with previous studies [7], [9], [10], [11], [12]. However, merely studying burn injury cases presenting to burns services gives little information about the communities these patients live in or the risk of burn injuries in the population at large. Geographic mapping provides a unique opportunity for identifying communities at high risk of
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the International Burn Injury Database (iBID) for providing the data used in this study. We also wish to thank Professor Peter Dziewulski (St Andrews Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford) and Mr Simon Booth (Burns Service, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, West Sussex) for their help and encouragement in carrying out this study.
References (35)
- et al.
Burns represent a significant proportion of the total serious trauma workload in England and Wales
Burns
(2012) - et al.
Trends in hospital admissions for burns in England, 1991–2010: a descriptive population-based study
Burns
(2013) - et al.
Area characteristics and determinants of hospitalised childhood burn injury: a study in the city of Cape Town
Public Health
(2006) - et al.
Geographic mapping as a tool for identifying communities at high risk of fire and burn injuries in children
Burns
(2009) - et al.
Geospatial and epidemiological analysis of severe burns in New South Wales by residential postcodes
Burns
(2014) - et al.
Socioeconomic deprivation and burns
Burns
(2010) - et al.
Individual and area socioeconomic inequalities in cause-specific unintentional injury mortality: 11-year follow-up study of 2.7 million canadians
Accid Anal Prev
(2012) - et al.
Mortality, severe morbidity, and injury in children living with single parents in Sweden: a population-based study
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
‘Race’ or place? Explaining ethnic variations in childhood pedestrian injury rates in London
Health Place
(2010) - et al.
Patterns of unintentional injury in childhood and their relation to socio-economic factors
Public Health
(1999)
Burns in the disabled
Burns
Social and economic factors associated with the risk of burn injury
Burns
Identification of the high-risk population for serious burn injuries
Burns Incl Therm Inj
Burn patterns of Asian ethnic minorities living in west Yorkshire, UK
Burns
Ethnic differences in burn mechanism and severity in a UK paediatric population
Burns
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Cited by (19)
Neighborhood risk: Socioeconomic status and hospital admission for pediatric burn patients
2021, BurnsCitation Excerpt :Our study suggests that children in Rhode Island from low socioeconomic areas have a higher likelihood of an inpatient admission for pediatric burn injury visits. Previous studies of inpatient pediatric burn injury have shown a correlation with geographic areas of lower socioeconomic level in Australia [14,15], the United Kingdom [16], and within the United States [17]. These studies utilize the home address of patients admitted for burn injury to classify the socioeconomic status of their neighborhood and concluded that children in areas of low socioeconomic status are at higher risk of burn injury.
Epidemiological evaluation paediatric burn injuries via an outpatient database in Eastern Ontario
2018, Burns OpenCitation Excerpt :The epidemiology of burn injuries has also been well described worldwide. The mean age of pediatric patients who sustained thermal injuries ranges from 1 to 5.3 years, with a mean burn extent of 5–20% TBSA (total body surface area); the main mechanism is scald with hot liquids (56%), followed by contact with hot surfaces in the age group 0–5 years (up to 23%) and flame (15–29%) [1,6,8–10]. In the last two decades, in the developed countries, the incidence of major and moderate burn injuries in paediatric population decreased significantly, but their severity increased.
Socioeconomic status, gender, and burn injury: A retrospective review
2017, American Journal of SurgeryCitation Excerpt :This study utilized census data to calculate percent below poverty level at each zip code. Other studies used the father's job description and the Family Affluence Scale,2 level of education, occupation, and monthly income,7 demographics from hospital record review,11 and census data.4,6 SES variables are poorly defined, and inconsistent measurements of SES status across studies makes comparison difficult.
Spatial analysis of pediatric burns shows geographical clustering of burns and 'hotspots' of risk factors in New South Wales, Australia
2016, BurnsCitation Excerpt :This study also highlights the issue of higher risk areas for burns having greater rates of inadequate first aid management for the injury. A study by this burns center has also shown that there is also a systemic tendency for overestimation to occur throughout the entire TBSA spectrum, which is persists with increasing time after the burn [46]. These findings infer that appropriate first aid with timely presentation to a burns center would provide optimal treatment and should be the central message for burns prevention.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ETIOLOGY OF BURNS IN IRAN THROUGH THE EXAMINATION OF THE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SITUATION
2023, Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters