Investigating the effects of tic suppression on premonitory urge ratings in children and adolescents with Tourette's syndrome

Abstract

Tics represent a complex class of behaviors that have a neurobiological origin and are influenced by factors both internal and external to the individual. One factor that has gained recent attention is the premonitory urge. Contemporary behavioral models suggest that some tics are preceded by aversive somatic urges that increase in severity when tics are suppressed and are attenuated by performance of the tic. It has been proposed that the removal of premonitory urges may strengthen or maintain tics via negative reinforcement. This investigation is the first to empirically evaluate the effect of tic suppression on the premonitory urge phenomenon. Five children and adolescents, ages 8–17 years, participated in the study. Using an ABAB reversal design, tic frequency and subjective premonitory urge ratings were recorded under conditions of free-to-tic baseline (BL) and reinforced tic suppression (differential reinforcement of zero-rate behavior). Results show that four of the five children demonstrated reliable suppression. Of the four children who achieved suppression, three demonstrated a pattern in which subjective urge ratings were higher during suppression than during BL. Results provide preliminary support for the negative reinforcement view of tic function for some children.

Introduction

Chronic tic disorders (CTDs), including Tourette's syndrome (TS), are characterized by involuntary motor and/or vocal tics. Although there is substantial evidence that tics arise from neurobiological dysfunction, there is a growing body of research showing that tic expression can be influenced (both exacerbated and attenuated) by environmental contingencies involving both internal and external stimuli (Himle & Woods, 2005; O’Connor, Brisebois, Brault, Robillard, & Loiselle, 2003; Piacentini et al., 2006; Silva, Munoz, Barickman, & Friedhoff, 1995; Woods & Himle, 2004). Such findings have led to an increased recognition that existing models of TS will need to account for behavioral processes to more fully understand the development, maintenance, and treatment of the disorder (Evers & van de Wetering, 1994; Woods, Himle, Piacentini, & Chang, 2005).

One internal stimulus that may exert functional influence over tics is the premonitory urge. Although observable tics are the defining features of TS, many individuals report experiencing “urges,” which are described as unpleasant somatic phenomena that “build up” prior to the tic (or upon attempts to resist ticcing) and are temporarily alleviated by performance of the tic (Leckman, Walker, & Cohen, 1993). In some instances, premonitory urges are more bothersome than the tics themselves (Kane, 1994).

Existing research on premonitory phenomena has stemmed primarily from phenomenological reports provided by individuals with TS. Bliss (1980) described sensory signals that preceded his tics along with “a very rapidly escalating desire to satisfy the sensations with movements intended to free oneself from the insistent feeling” (p. 37). Kane (1994) echoed this description and added, “these sensations are not mere precursors to tics; they precipitate tics…more than providing a signal of imminence, the pre-tic sensation acts as the aversive stimulus toward which tics are directed” (p. 806).

In one of the first formal investigations of the premonitory urge, Leckman et al. (1993) conducted a cross-sectional study in which they asked 135 individuals with TS (ages 8–71 years) to identify and localize their premonitory urges and found that 93% of respondents reported having an urge to tic. In a more recent study, Kwak, Vuong, and Jankovic (2003) administered a questionnaire to 50 individuals (mean age 23.6±16.7 years) with TS and found that 92% reported the presence of a premonitory urge. Children with tics also report premonitory urges. Banaschewski, Woerner, and Rothenberger (2003) administered a questionnaire to 254 children with TS and found that 24% of those aged 8–10 years, 34% of those aged 11–14, and 57% of those aged 15–19 reported a premonitory urge. Woods et al. (2005) evaluated premonitory urge phenomena in 42 children and adolescents with TS or CTD (age 8–16 years) and found that 41 of 42 children (98%) reported the presence of urges.

Although the exact relationship between tics and premonitory urges is not yet known, there is indirect evidence to suggest that premonitory urges develop over time and become functionally related to the performance of tics. For example, Leckman et al. (1993) found that the respondents in their study reported having first become aware of the premonitory urge an average of 3.1 years after tic onset, suggesting that premonitory urges are absent during early stages of the disorder and emerge over time. Woods et al. (2005) found that although both younger (⩽10 yrs) and older children (>10 yrs) reported the presence of premonitory urges, urge ratings and tic severity were correlated only for the older children. This further supports the notion that premonitory urges become functionally related to tics over time.

The exact nature of the premonitory urge is unclear, but it appears to play a significant role in tic expression. In fact, most of the participants in both Leckman et al.'s (1993) and Kwak et al.'s (2003) studies (92% and 68%, respectively) reported that their tics eliminated premonitory urges. If this is the case, then it is possible that tics begin as non-functional responses which, with the development of premonitory urges, become strengthened and maintained by automatic negative reinforcement (Evers & van de Wetering, 1994; Woods et al., 2005). This may begin to explain the tendency for some tics to change in topography, location, and complexity over time.

Unfortunately, the functional relationship between premonitory phenomena and tics has not been experimentally verified. One barrier to testing the relationship is that there is no known method for reliably inducing an urge in order to observe its impact on tic expression. Such inductions would be necessary to determine the functional control of the urge over tics. Nevertheless, it may be possible to circumvent this methodological problem by inducing tic suppression and observing the impact of suppression on premonitory urge ratings. If the urge is indeed aversive and the removal of the urge negatively reinforces tics, then blocking the tics should temporarily increase the salience of the urge, thereby increasing the likelihood that an individual will tic to remove the urge (i.e., increases the reinforcing value of urge removal; Michael, 1993). Conversely, if a child with TS is allowed to tic freely, then the urge should be relatively low in salience and strength, as the tics will occur more frequently in the service of urge reduction. An analogous process might be seen in eating behavior. When prevented from eating (i.e., food deprivation), both the positive reinforcer (i.e., food) and negative reinforcer (i.e., removal of hunger) will momentarily become more salient and more effective reinforcers (i.e., increase the likelihood that an individual will eat). Conversely, relative to such periods, food and hunger will become less effective reinforcers in the moment, as the individual is allowed to eat freely.

Understanding the relationship between the premonitory urge and tic suppression has implications for current behavioral models of TS as well as for treatment. Increased urge ratings during suppression would provide preliminary support for the negative reinforcement view of tic expression. From a treatment standpoint, an increase in premonitory urge “severity” during suppression might suggest that behavioral treatments (e.g., habit reversal training), which teach children to use a competing (incompatible) response to suppress tics, will need to consider that even when children are motivated to use such suppression strategies, performance of the tic may itself have reinforcing consequences (i.e., removal of aversive urges). In essence, this sets up a competition between the two behaviors: ticcing and utilizing the competing response. If this is the case, then some children may benefit from the use of additional reward programs to motivate them to utilize suppression techniques.

Understanding the relationship between suppression and premonitory urge severity may also lead to new insights regarding the mechanism by which behavioral treatments are effective in reducing tics. For example, it has been proposed that competing responses taught in habit reversal, which typically involve the contraction of muscles antagonistic to the tic, may be serve the same function as the tic itself (Miltenberger, Fuqua, & Woods, 1998). One possibility is that the competing response functions to alleviate the urge and, over time, the competing response is strengthened until its performance becomes habitual. While this explanation seems plausible, research on HRT suggests that the most important aspect of a competing response is that it is employed preemptively (i.e., prior to the undesirable behavior, thereby interrupting its occurrence; Miltenberger & Fuqua, 1985) and that the competing response does not necessarily need to be directly incompatible (Woods et al., 1999). If premonitory urges are functionally related to tics, then perhaps it is the case that the competing response does not alleviate the urge, but rather provides the person with a strategy to use to suppress the tic, thereby allowing the urge to habituate.

The current study was designed to evaluate the effects of tic suppression on premonitory urge ratings by obtaining subjective ratings of the premonitory urges during conditions of baseline (BL; i.e., free to tic) and reinforced tic suppression. Experimental preparations utilizing reinforcement for tic-free intervals (differential reinforcement of zero-rate behavior (DRO)) have been shown in several studies to produce significant, reliable, short-term tic suppression in most children (Himle & Woods, 2005; Woods & Himle, 2004). Consistent with the negative reinforcement view, it was predicted that urge ratings would be relatively high during periods of successful tic suppression (because tics are not performed to reduce the urge) when compared with BL conditions in which participants were asked to tic freely.