Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 89, Issue 5, 1 March 2021, Pages 424-432
Biological Psychiatry

Archival Report
A Longitudinal Study of White Matter Development in Relation to Changes in Autism Severity Across Early Childhood

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Cross-sectional diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies suggest that young autistic children have alterations in white matter structure that differ from older autistic individuals. However, it is unclear whether these differences result from atypical neurodevelopment or sampling differences between young and older cohorts. Furthermore, the relationship between altered white matter development and longitudinal changes in autism symptoms is unknown.

Methods

Using longitudinal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging acquired over 2 to 3 time points between the ages of approximately 2.5 to 7.0 years in 125 autistic children and 69 typically developing control participants, we directly tested the hypothesis that autistic individuals have atypical white matter development across childhood. Additionally, we sought to determine whether changes in white matter diffusion parameters were associated with longitudinal changes in autism severity.

Results

Autistic children were found to have slower development of fractional anisotropy in the cingulum bundle, superior longitudinal fasciculus, internal capsule, and splenium of the corpus callosum. Furthermore, in the sagittal stratum, autistic individuals who increased in autism severity over time had a slower developmental trajectory of fractional anisotropy compared with individuals whose autism decreased in severity. In the uncinate fasciculus, autistic individuals who decreased in autism symptom severity also had greater increases in fractional anisotropy with age.

Conclusions

These longitudinal findings indicate that previously reported differences in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging measures between younger and older autism cohorts are attributable to an atypical developmental trajectory of white matter. Differences in white matter development between individuals whose autism severity increased, remained stable, or decreased suggest that these functional differences are associated with fiber development in the autistic brain.

Section snippets

Participants

This study included 125 autistic individuals and 69 typically developing control participants (Figure 1; Table 1). Participants were enrolled in either the ongoing University of California Davis Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Institute Autism Phenome Project (APP) or Girls with Autism: Imaging of Neurodevelopment (GAIN) study. The longitudinal design of these studies includes MRI scanning at three time points: enrollment/baseline at 24 to 42 months of age and annual

Demographics

The ASD and typically developing participants did not significantly differ in the number of DW-MRI time points acquired or in age across all time points, at time 1, time 2, or time 3 (p > .05). At time 1, autistic children had a significantly lower Mullen full scale and verbal and nonverbal developmental quotient scores compared with the typically developing control participants (p < .0001). Autistic males and females did not significantly differ in baseline full scale, verbal, or nonverbal

Discussion

Our aim was to characterize the development of white matter structure in ASD compared with TD across early childhood. We found the developmental trajectory of FA measures from approximately 2.5 to 7.0 years old in autistic individuals to be slower compared with typically developing individuals, leading to the emergence of lower FA values in ASD with age. Across early childhood, the developmental trajectory of FA in ASD was marked by a transition from increased to decreased FA compared with TD

Acknowledgments and Disclosures

The research reported in this article was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant No. R01MH104438 [to CWN], R01MH103284 [to MS], R01MH103371 [to DGA]), and the MIND Institute Autism Research Training Program (Grant No. T32MH073124 [to DSA]), as well as the UC Davis Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, MIND Institute Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center

References (60)

  • A.L. Alexander et al.

    Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum in Autism

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • K.-A. Cheon et al.

    Involvement of the anterior thalamic radiation in boys with high functioning autism spectrum disorders: A diffusion tensor imaging study

    Brain Res

    (2011)
  • F.K. Satterstrom et al.

    Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism

    Cell

    (2020)
  • H.-Y. Lin et al.

    Development of frontoparietal connectivity predicts longitudinal symptom changes in young people with autism spectrum disorder

    Transl Psychiatry

    (2019)
  • C. Lebel et al.

    The development of brain white matter microstructure

    NeuroImage

    (2018)
  • M. Wang et al.

    Increased neural progenitor proliferation in a hiPSC model of autism induces replication stress-associated genome instability

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2020)
  • J.D. Lewis et al.

    The emergence of network inefficiencies in infants with autism spectrum disorder

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • D.A. Raffelt et al.

    Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis

    NeuroImage

    (2017)
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (2013)
  • G. Picci et al.

    A theoretical rut: Revisiting and critically evaluating the generalized under/over-connectivity hypothesis of autism

    Dev Sci

    (2016)
  • M. Weinstein et al.

    Abnormal white matter integrity in young children with autism

    Hum Brain Mapp

    (2011)
  • L. Billeci et al.

    White matter connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorders: A tract-based spatial statistics study

    BMC Neurol

    (2012)
  • J.J. Wolff et al.

    Differences in white matter fiber tract development present from 6 to 24 months in infants with autism

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • Z. Xiao et al.

    Autism spectrum disorder as early neurodevelopmental disorder: Evidence from the brain imaging abnormalities in 2–3 years old toddlers

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (2014)
  • D.S. Andrews et al.

    A diffusion-weighted imaging tract-based spatial statistics study of autism spectrum disorder in preschool-aged children

    J Neurodev Disord

    (2019)
  • E. Conti et al.

    The first 1000 days of the autistic brain: A systematic review of diffusion imaging studies

    Front Hum Neurosci

    (2015)
  • B.G. Travers et al.

    Atypical development of white matter microstructure of the corpus callosum in males with autism: A longitudinal investigation

    Mol Autism

    (2015)
  • K. McLaughlin et al.

    Longitudinal development of thalamic and internal capsule microstructure in autism spectrum disorder

    Autism Res

    (2018)
  • S.-J. Hong et al.

    The superficial white matter in autism and its role in connectivity anomalies and symptom severity

    Cereb Cortex

    (2019)
  • J. Fitzgerald et al.

    Abnormal fronto-parietal white matter organisation in the superior longitudinal fasciculus branches in autism spectrum disorders

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2018)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Does the severity of autism symptoms change over time? A review of the evidence, impacts, and gaps in current knowledge

      2023, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such studies may seek to identify biological mechanisms responsible for changes in severity or resulting from them. For instance, Andrews et al. (2021) identified an association between trajectories of white matter development and children's differential symptom severity change patterns across early childhood. Such biology-behavior links, if identified, could be used as biomarkers for expected symptom severity change in an individual over time.

    • Sex/gender differences in the human autistic brains: A systematic review of 20 years of neuroimaging research

      2021, NeuroImage: Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      At this stage, 77% of these studies (N = 758) were excluded because sex and/or gender variables were not examined or treated as a covariate in analysis; only 93 studies had some consideration for sex and/or gender variables. Of the 93 studies, 69 studies that examined sex/gender-by-diagnosis interaction effects and/or sex/gender-stratified analyses of autism-control differences were eligible for systematic review and were retained for qualitative synthesis (Alaerts et al., 2016; Andrews et al., 2017, 2019, 2021; Beacher et al., 2012a,b; Bedford et al., 2020; Bletsch et al., 2021; Bosco et al., 2019; Contarino et al., 2016; Di and Biswal, 2016; Doyle-Thomas et al., 2014; Floris et al., 2021; Fung et al., 2021; Giuliano et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2019; Hammill et al., 2021; Henry et al., 2018; Hernandez et al., 2020; Holt et al., 2014; Hsu et al., 2018; Irimia et al., 2017, 2018, Kirkovski et al., 2015, 2016a,b, 2018, 2020; Lai et al., 2013b, 2019b; Laidi et al., 2017; Lawrence et al., 2020b; Lee et al., 2020, 2021; Lei et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2019; Maier et al., 2018; Mei et al., 2020; Mitelman et al., 2018; Moessnang et al., 2020; Nordahl et al., 2020; Olafson et al., 2021; Olson et al., 2020; O’Neill et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 2019; Postema et al., 2019; Retico et al., 2016; Saunders et al., 2016; Schaer et al., 2015; Schneider et al., 2013; Schumann et al., 2010; Shen et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2019; Subbaraju et al., 2017; Sussman et al., 2015; Tomasi and Volkow, 2019; Trakoshis et al., 2020; van Rooij et al., 2018; Williams et al., 2020; Yang and Lee, 2018; Yankowitz et al., 2020; Yoshimura et al., 2021; Ypma et al., 2016; Zeestraten et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018; Bode et al., 2011; Ecker, 2019; Kozhemiako et al., 2020; Lawrence et al., 2020a; Appendix-Table 1). Data extracted from these studies were stratified by neuroimaging modality, including structural MRI, CT, DWI/DTI/DSI, task fMRI, resting-state fMRI, PET, resting-state EEG, MEG, MRS, TMS-EEG, as well as different methods of analysis of sex and/or gender variables.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    CWN and DGA contributed equally to this work as joint senior primary investigators.

    View full text