Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 86, Issue 2, 15 July 2019, Pages 97-109
Biological Psychiatry

Review
Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Genetics provides two major opportunities for understanding human disease—as a transformative line of etiological inquiry and as a biomarker for heritable diseases. In psychiatry, biomarkers are very much needed for both research and treatment, given the heterogenous populations identified by current phenomenologically based diagnostic systems. To date, however, useful and valid biomarkers have been scant owing to the inaccessibility and complexity of human brain tissue and consequent lack of insight into disease mechanisms. Genetic biomarkers are therefore especially promising for psychiatric disorders. Genome-wide association studies of common diseases have matured over the last decade, generating the knowledge base for increasingly informative individual-level genetic risk prediction. In this review, we discuss fundamental concepts involved in computing genetic risk with current methods, strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, assessments of utility, and applications to various psychiatric disorders and related traits. Although genetic risk prediction has become increasingly straightforward to apply and common in published studies, there are important pitfalls to avoid. At present, the clinical utility of genetic risk prediction is still low; however, there is significant promise for future clinical applications as the ancestral diversity and sample sizes of genome-wide association studies increase. We discuss emerging data and methods aimed at improving the value of genetic risk prediction for disentangling disease mechanisms and stratifying subjects for epidemiological and clinical studies. For all applications, it is absolutely critical that polygenic risk prediction is applied with appropriate methodology and control for confounding to avoid repeating some mistakes of the candidate gene era.

Section snippets

A Brief History of the Foundational Theories Underlying Statistical Genetics

Genetic risk prediction is rooted in complex trait theory and biometry (the application of statistics to biological measures), which emerged in the 19th century. Darwin’s concepts of selection based on continuous phenotypic variation were reconciled with Mendel’s laws of inheritance proposing discontinuous steps, which were initially interpreted as contradictory. In this context, in the mid-1870s Sir Francis Galton promoted use of twin and family studies to investigate inheritance. He

Concepts and Methods to Interpret Ranges of Genetic Prediction Accuracy

The key elements that influence the accuracy of PRSs for a specific trait are its SNP heritability, genetic architecture, and sample size of the discovery GWAS (Supplemental Table S1; see also Supplemental Note). SNP heritability is estimated as the additive contribution of common genetic variation to trait variability 8, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 (Table 1). It is typically a fraction of family-based heritability, which captures contributions from all types of genetic variation.

PRSs have become much

Applications of GWASs and PRSs to Psychiatric Disorders and Related Traits

Although PRSs hold especially great promise in psychiatry because of inaccessibility and complexity of brain tissue and lack of clinical biomarkers, they are not yet clinically useful, but they are useful for research. Applications of PRSs to psychiatric disorders have provided insight into disease outcomes, correlated phenotypes, and biological mechanisms. We review recent large GWASs and PRSs of psychiatric disorders and relevant phenotypes in Table 2.

PRS studies have been especially abundant

Acknowledgments and Disclosures

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant No. K99MH117229 (to ARM). UK Biobank analyses were conducted via application 31063.

We thank Eric Minikel for helpful feedback and discussions during the preparation of this manuscript. We also thank Sanni Ruotsalainen for plotting epidemiological cardiovascular factors using FINRISK data.

ARM, MJD, and EBR reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. SEH is a Director of Voyager Therapeutics and

References (131)

  • B.J. Vilhjálmsson et al.

    Modeling linkage disequilibrium increases accuracy of polygenic risk scores

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2015)
  • E. Vassos et al.

    An Examination of polygenic score risk prediction in individuals with first-episode psychosis

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • D.M. Ruderfer et al.

    Polygenic overlap between schizophrenia risk and antipsychotic response: A genomic medicine approach

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • M. Paquette et al.

    Polygenic risk score predicts prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

    J Clin Lipidol

    (2017)
  • D.E.J. Linden

    The challenges and promise of neuroimaging in psychiatry

    Neuron

    (2012)
  • L. Riglin et al.

    Schizophrenia risk alleles and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood: A population-based cohort study

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • J. Martin et al.

    Genetic risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder contributes to neurodevelopmental traits in the general population

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • S.J. Sanders et al.

    Insights into autism spectrum disorder genomic architecture and biology from 71 risk loci

    Neuron

    (2015)
  • M.J. Daly et al.

    Chapter 3 – Natural selection and neuropsychiatric disease: Theory, observation, and emerging genetic findings

  • G. Kichaev et al.

    Leveraging functional-annotation data in trans-ethnic fine-mapping studies

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2015)
  • N. Zaitlen et al.

    Leveraging genetic variability across populations for the identification of causal variants

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2010)
  • R.A. Fisher

    XV.—The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance

    Trans R Soc Edinburgh

    (1918)
  • K. Pearson et al.

    Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VIII. On the inheritance of characters not capable of exact quantitative measurement. Part I. Introductory. Part II. On the inheritance of coat-colour in horses. Part III. On the inheritance of eye-colour in man

    Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci

    (1900)
  • S. Wright

    An analysis of variability in number of digits in an inbred strain of Guinea pigs

    Genetics

    (1934)
  • D.S. Falconer

    The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives

    Ann Hum Genet

    (1965)
  • Gottesman et al.

    A polygenic theory of schizophrenia

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1967)
  • A haplotype map of the human genome

    Nature

    (2005)
  • J. Yang et al.

    Concepts, estimation and interpretation of SNP-based heritability

    Nat Genet

    (2017)
  • Howrigan D (2017, September 20): Details and Considerations of the UK Biobank GWAS. Available at:...
  • A.E. Locke et al.

    Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology

    Nature

    (2015)
  • S. Ripke et al.

    Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci

    Nature

    (2014)
  • J. Zheng et al.

    LD Hub: A centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis

    Bioinformatics

    (2017)
  • J.M. Hickey et al.

    Genomic prediction unifies animal and plant breeding programs to form platforms for biological discovery

    Nat Genet

    (2017)
  • N. Chatterjee et al.

    Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2016)
  • S.M. Purcell et al.

    Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

    Nature

    (2009)
  • N.R. Wray et al.

    Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies

    Genome Res

    (2007)
  • N.R. Wray et al.

    Research review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits

    J Child Psychol Psychiatr

    (2014)
  • J. Yang et al.

    Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height

    Nat Genet

    (2010)
  • B.K. Bulik-Sullivan et al.

    LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies

    Nat Genet

    (2015)
  • P.-R. Loh et al.

    Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts

    Nat Genet

    (2015)
  • D. Golan et al.

    Measuring missing heritability: Inferring the contribution of common variants

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2014)
  • P. Turley et al.

    Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG

    Nat Genet

    (2018)
  • M. Scutari et al.

    Using genetic distance to infer the accuracy of genomic prediction

    PLoS Genet

    (2016)
  • N.R. Wray et al.

    Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2013)
  • N. Chatterjee et al.

    Projecting the performance of risk prediction based on polygenic analyses of genome-wide association studies

    Nat Genet

    (2013)
  • C.-Y. Chen et al.

    Explicit modeling of ancestry improves polygenic risk scores and BLUP prediction

    Genet Epidemiol

    (2015)
  • H.K. Finucane et al.

    Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics

    Nat Genet

    (2015)
  • F. Dudbridge

    Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores

    PLoS Genet

    (2013)
  • R.M. Maier et al.

    Improving genetic prediction by leveraging genetic correlations among human diseases and traits

    Nat Commun

    (2018)
  • J.K. Pickrell et al.

    Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits

    Nat Genet

    (2016)
  • Cited by (160)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text