Is coherent motion an appropriate test for magnocellular sensitivity?
Introduction
The early part of the primate visual pathway contains three parallel streams: the magnocellular, the parvocellular, and the koniocellular systems (see Hendry and Reid, 2000, Merigan and Maunsell, 1993, Shapley and Perry, 1986, for reviews). The separation between these systems is most pronounced in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN), where the magno- and parvocellular neurons form anatomically separate layers, with the koniocellular neurons occupying the interlaminar spaces (often referred to as koniocellular layers or K-layers; Hendry & Reid, 2000). From the LGN the magnocellular and parvocellular neurons send axons to two separate sublayers (layers 4C-α and 4C-β, respectively) of the primary visual cortex (V1). Although initial reports emphasized the separateness of magno- and parvocellular inputs in the cortex (Livingstone and Hubel, 1987, Livingstone and Hubel, 1988, Maunsell et al., 1990), it has become increasingly clear that it is difficult to maintain a clear magno-/parvocellular distinction beyond the input layers to the primary visual cortex, owing to the mixing of inputs inside the cortex (Lachica et al., 1992, Levitt et al., 1994, Martin, 1992, Merigan and Maunsell, 1993, Nealey and Maunsell, 1994, Sawatari and Callaway, 1996, Sincich and Horton, 2002, Vidyasagar et al., 2002; see also DeYoe and Van Essen, 1988, Dobkins and Albright, 2003, Kiper et al., 1999). The path of the koniocellular input to VI has yet to be worked out in detail; however, there is no evidence to suggest that this input gives rise to a separate cortical stream. It has recently been reported that in addition to providing input to V1, koniocellular LGN neurons send direct input (bypassing V1) to cortical area MT (Sincich, Park, Wohlgemuth, & Horton, 2004) (a cortical area considered by some to represent part of, or an extension of, the magnocellular system). Nevertheless, even this input does not constitute a completely pure koniocellular stream, since approximately one third of the neurons contributing axons to this input appear to be non-koniocellular (Sincich et al., 2004).
Starting in the primary visual cortex two cortical streams may be discerned: the “dorsal” and “ventral” streams. The dorsal stream includes the Middle Temporal area (area MT; also known as V5) and the ventral stream includes area V4 (Merigan and Maunsell, 1993, Ungerleider and Mishkin, 1982). The dorsal and ventral streams are linked to functional differences. The dorsal stream is widely believed to be implicated in motion perception (Livingstone and Hubel, 1987, Zeki, 1978a), specifically in perception of coherent motion (Stein, 2003), whereas the ventral stream is linked to the perception of color and form (Zeki, 1978b). The dorsal and ventral streams are sometimes referred to as the “where” and the “what” streams (Mishkin, Ungerleider, & Macko, 1983). Lately, some investigators have sought to extended the concept of the “magnocellular system” to include the dorsal stream (Stein, 2001, Stein, 2003) or to extend the “magnocellular” and “parvocellular systems” to include, respectively, the dorsal and ventral cortical streams (Edwards et al., 2004). There are (at least) three problems associated with extending the concepts of “magnocellular” and “parvocellular” in this way: (1) the nature of the distinction between the various systems is obscured, because the dorsal stream, in addition to magnocellular input, receives inputs which can be traced back to the parvocellular (Maunsell et al., 1990, Merigan and Maunsell, 1993, Sincich and Horton, 2002, Yabuta et al., 2001) and koniocellular systems (Sincich et al., 2004), and the ventral stream, judging from recordings in V4 following LGN lesioning, receives about equally strong inputs of magno- and parvocellular origin (Ferrera, Nealey, & Maunsell, 1994; see also Martin, 1992). (2) Extending the terms “magnocellular” and “parvocellular” in this manner reduces their predictive power given that neurons in the subcortical systems and in the visual cortex have quite different response properties. Thus, predictions based on subcortical magnocellular neurons would tend to be quite different from predictions based on neurons in the dorsal cortical stream. Finally, (3) a functional unity between the subcortical systems and the cortical streams is suggested or implied. Functional unity is problematic given the differences in the neuronal response properties and the differences in the constraints placed on the subcortical and cortical systems. For these reasons, we favor a definition of the “magnocellular” and “parvocellular systems” that restricts these terms to the subcortical portion of the visual system.1 (It should be noted that when we use terms such as “magnocellular inputs” or “parvocellular inputs” in connection with higher order cortical areas, we are referring to neuronal responses whose origins can be traced back to, respectively, the subcortical magno- and parvocellular systems. We do not mean to imply that the magno- and parvocellular systems themselves extend to cortical areas beyond V1).
The functional significance of the magno-, parvo-, and koniocellular systems is not well understood. In attempts to gain insight into this issue investigators have sought to devise psychophysical and electrophysiological tests that selectively assess the functioning of one of the systems. These attempts have focused to a large extent on tests of the magnocellular system. However, many of these tests do not seem well suited to the task (Skottun, 2001a, Skottun, 2001b, Skottun, 2004a, Skottun, 2004b, Skottun and Skoyles, 2004). A number of investigators have claimed, suggested, or implied that perception of coherent motion can be used to assess the sensitivity of the magnocellular system, and consequently, that difficulties perceiving coherent motion may be attributed to deficits in the magnocellular system (Cornelissen et al., 1998a, Cornelissen et al., 1995, Cornelissen et al., 1998b, Eden et al., 1996, Edwards et al., 2004, Milne et al., 2002, Pammer and Wheatley, 2001, Schulte-Korne et al., 2004, Slaghuis and Ryan, 1999, Solan et al., 2003, Stein, 2001, Stein, 2003, Stein and Walsh, 1997, Talcott et al., 2000a, Talcott et al., 1998, Talcott et al., 2000b, Witton et al., 1998).
Perception of coherent motion is typically obtained by presenting a field of small moving random dots in which some portion of the dots move in the same direction, i.e., move coherently, while the rest move randomly. The percentage of coherently moving dots is then varied. The percentage of coherently moving dots required for the subject to perceive a coherently moving field of dots is taken as the measure of perceptual performance (Britten et al., 1992, Newsome and Pare, 1988). As will become clear below, the claim, or suggestion, that this performance should reflect magnocellular activity is problematic for several reasons.
Section snippets
Direct relationship between the magnocellular system and coherent motion
The question of a direct relationship between the magnocellular system and coherent motion can be examined in relation to four topics: (1) direction selectivity, (2) area of integration, (3) lesion studies, and (4) effects of flicker and red backgrounds.
Indirect relationship between coherent motion and the magnocellular system
There is, by contrast, evidence to link coherent motion to cortical area MT (sometimes referred to as V5) (Antal et al., 2004, Britten et al., 1992, Movshon et al., 1985, Newsome et al., 1989, Newsome and Pare, 1988). Area MT receives a considerable portion of its input from the magnocellular system (Maunsell et al., 1990, Merigan and Maunsell, 1993). Therefore, a more plausible argument for linking coherent motion to the magnocellular system could be made based on the evidence that coherent
Coherence with drifting gratings
While the attempts to link coherent motion to the magnocellular system have focused on coherent motion in random dot stimuli, there is another form of coherent motion that has also been linked specifically to area MT. This form of coherent motion involves drifting gratings. When two overlapping gratings of different orientations are drifted at the same time, one sometimes perceives one combined drifting plaid (Movshon et al., 1985). Neurons at lower cortical levels respond in accordance with
Discussion
In the above considerations we have largely treated the term “magnocellular system” in its original meaning, namely as a subcortical entity. Clearly, if this term is defined in this way it is very difficult to see how coherent motion performance could be a direct test of activity in the magnocellular system, given that subcortical neurons lack direction selectivity and integrate stimulation over only small regions. Also, the use of coherent motion as an indirect test is problematic in this case
Acknowledgment
We are indebted to Lesley A. Parke for comments on the manuscript.
References (92)
- et al.
Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain
Current Biology
(2000) - et al.
The effect of disrupting the human magnocellular pathway on global motion perception
Vision Research
(2004) - et al.
Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls
Vision Research
(1995) - et al.
Magnocellular visual function and children’s single word reading
Vision Research
(1998) - et al.
Coherent motion detection and letter position encoding
Vision Research
(1998) - et al.
Image segmentation enhances discrimination of motion in visual noise
Vision Research
(1997) - et al.
Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex
Trends in Neurosciences
(1988) - et al.
Interaction of motion and color in the visual pathways
Trends in Neurosciences
(1996) Parallel pathways converge
Current Biology
(1992)- et al.
Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways
Trends in Neurosciences
(1983)
Isolating the M(y)-cell response in dyslexia using the spatial frequency doubling illusion
Vision Research
Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence?
Neuropsychologia
On the specificity of neurons and visual areas
Behavioural Brain Research
Visual evoked potential elicited by coherently moving dots in dyslexic children
Neuroscience Letters
Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles
Trends in Neurosciences
The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity
Vision Research
Some remarks on the use of motion VEPs to assess magnocellular sensitivity
Clinical Neurophysiology
On the prevalence of magnocellular deficits in the visual system of non-dyslexic individuals
Brain and Language
Spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity, coherent motion, and visible persistence in developmental dyslexia
Vision Research
Visual motion sensitivity and reading
Neuropsychologia
To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia
Trends in Neurosciences
Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit?
Vision Research
The influence of color on the perception of luminance motion
Vision Research
Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: Evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits
Neuropsychologia
Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers
Current Biology
Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque
Journal of Neurophysiology
Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque
Journal of Neurophysiology
Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance
Journal of Neuroscience
The contribution of color to motion in normal and color-deficient observers
Vision Research
Segmentation by color influences responses of motion-sensitive neurons in the cortical middle temporal visual area
Journal of Neuroscience
Merging processing streams: Color cues for motion detection and interpretation
Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging
Nature
Psychophysical indexes of temporal processing abnormalities in children with developmental dyslexia
Developmental Neuropsychology
Responses in macaque visual area V4 following inactivation of the parvocellular and magnocellular LGN pathways
Journal of Neuroscience
Temporal characteristics of colour vision: VEP and psychophysical evidence
Response selectivity of neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey during reversible inactivation of area V1
Journal of Neurophysiology
Motion processing by chromatic and achromatic visual pathways
Journal of the Optical Society of America, A
Contrast sensitivity in dyslexia
Visual Neuroscience
Are dyslexics’ visual deficits limited to measures of dorsal stream function?
Neuroreport
Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex
Visual Neuroscience
The koniocellular pathway in primate vision
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Chromatic signals in extrastriate areas V2 and V3
Higher-order factors influencing the perception of sliding and coherence of a plaid
Perception
Parallel pathways in macaque monkey striate cortex: Anatomically defined columns in layer III
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Visual response properties of neurons in the LGN of normally reared and visually deprived macaque monkeys
Journal of Neurophysiology
Cited by (41)
Beyond the global motion deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia: A cross-sectional study of visual, cognitive, and socio-economic factors influencing reading ability in children
2019, Vision ResearchCitation Excerpt :However, some evidence remains mixed (Benassi, Simonelli, Giovagnoli, & Bolzani, 2010; Johnston, Pitchford, Roach, & Ledgeway, 2017; Schulte-Körne & Bruder, 2010). Not all studies report significant motion processing deficits in dyslexia (Boets, Wouters, Van Wieringen, & Ghesquière, 2006; Hulslander et al., 2004; Kronbichler, Hutzler, & Wimmer, 2002; Laycock, Crewther, Kiely, & Crewther, 2006; Skottun & Skoyles, 2006, 2008), and studies which examine the clinical significance of reduced motion sensitivity in dyslexia tend to find that effect sizes are small, and as few as one third of dyslexic individuals exhibit significant deficits (i.e. more than 1 SD below the mean) in visual motion sensitivity (Conlon, Lilleskaret, Wright, & Power, 2012; Conlon, Sanders, & Wright, 2009; Ramus, Pidgeon, & Frith, 2003; Ramus, Altarelli, Jednoróg, Zhao, & Scotto di Covella, 2018; Wright & Conlon, 2009). A number of methodological factors may contribute to the lack of consistency in findings to date (e.g., Johnston et al., 2017; Skottun, 2015).
Extrafoveally applied flashing light affects contrast thresholds of achromatic and S-cone isolating, but not L-M cone modulated stimuli
2018, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :Magnocellular neurons respond most to achromatic stimuli although under certain conditions [8], they can utilize red-green isoluminant contrast. A number of other methods have been devised to study the functionality of the MC pathway, such as coherent motion detection [9,10], contrast sensitivity [1,11], the Ternus-test (phantom contours) [12,13] and extrafoveal luminance stimulation as a means of suppression [14–18]. Light flashes are among the most commonly used stimuli to test the function of different parts of the visual system from the retina[19] to the visual cortex[20].
Morphological differences in the lateral geniculate nucleus associated with dyslexia
2015, NeuroImage: ClinicalCitation Excerpt :The LGN is therefore the only location in the brain where the magnocellular stream is spatially isolated, permitting a unique structural test here. It is also difficult to isolate the magnocellular pathway using particular visual stimuli (e.g. Skottun, 2001a; Skottun, 2001b, 2004; Skottun and Skoyles, 2007; Skottun and Skoyles, 2006a,b). Although Livingstone et al. (1991) examined the LGN in a small sample of post-mortem brains, their findings have never been replicated nor measured in vivo.
On using very high temporal frequencies to isolate magnocellular contributions to psychophysical tasks
2013, NeuropsychologiaCitation Excerpt :It is in this context interesting to note that a number of investigators (see Skottun & Skoyles, 2006, for references) have found deficient coherent motion perception in connection with dyslexia. Coherent motion has been linked to cortical area MT (Newsome, Britten, & Movshon, 1989) and is difficult to link directly to the magnocellular system since coherent motion depends on the ability to see direction and speed, something to which magnocellular neurons are largely insensitive (Skottun & Skoyles, 2006; Skottun, 2011). ( Goodbourn et al. 2012, have recently found that coherent motion performance is essentially uncorrelated with contrast detection.