Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 82, 1 November 2014, Pages 97-102
Appetite

Research report
Low maternal sensitivity at 6 months of age predicts higher BMI in 48 month old girls but not boys

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.012Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Background: Large population-based studies suggest that systematic measures of maternal sensitivity predict later risk for overweight and obesity. More work is needed to establish the developmental timing and potential moderators of this association. The current study examined the association between maternal sensitivity at 6 months of age and BMI z score measures at 48 months of age, and whether sex moderated this association. Design: Longitudinal Canadian cohort of children from birth (the MAVAN project). Methods: This analysis was based on a dataset of 223 children (115 boys, 108 girls) who had structured assessments of maternal sensitivity at 6 months of age and 48-month BMI data available. Mother–child interactions were videotaped and systematically scored using the Maternal Behaviour Q-Sort (MBQS)-25 items, a standardized measure of maternal sensitivity. Linear mixed-effects models and logistic regression examined whether MBQS scores at 6 months predicted BMI at 48 months, controlling for other covariates. Results: After controlling for weight-relevant covariates, there was a significant sex by MBQS interaction (P = 0.015) in predicting 48 month BMI z. Further analysis revealed a strong negative association between MBQS scores and BMI in girls (P = 0.01) but not boys (P = 0.72). Logistic regression confirmed that in girls only, low maternal sensitivity was associated with the higher BMI categories as defined by the WHO (i.e. “at risk for overweight” or above). Conclusions: A significant association between low maternal sensitivity at 6 months of age and high body mass indices was found in girls but not boys at 48 months of age. These data suggest for the first time that the link between low maternal sensitivity and early BMI z may differ between boys and girls.

Introduction

It has been argued that the very rapid increase in obesity rates over recent decades cannot be accounted for based on purely metabolic factors, and must relate in large part to one or more environmental factors (Gundersen et al, 2011, Lajunen et al, 2012, Puder, Munsch, 2010, Suglia et al, 2012, Vámosi et al, 2010). As summarized in recent reviews (Anzman et al, 2010, Mitchell et al, 2013, Sleddens et al, 2011, Ventura, Birch, 2008), the quality of parent–child interactions has been a focus of obesity work over several decades. However, much of this work has been either cross-sectional in design, done in relatively small samples and/or focused on school-age children and adolescents, which may limit the interpretation and generalizability of results. A greater focus on large, longitudinal, population-based studies, including data from the first few years of life, may point the way to more effective interventions going forward (Anzman et al., 2010).

One systematic way of assessing the quality of early parental–child relationships is to measure maternal–infant attachment and maternal sensitivity based on direct observation using standardized coding to score these interactions. Attachment can be defined as a bio-behavioural system to facilitate protection and survival through proximity and a secure base between mammalian caregivers and their infants (Bowlby, 1973, Goldberg, 2000). Maternal sensitivity refers to one specific aspect of the attachment system i.e. timely and appropriate responsivity on the part of the mother towards the cues of her infant (Ainsworth & Marvin, 1995). In addition to providing a framework for the objective and standardized assessment of parent–child interactions, attachment and maternal sensitivity have the further advantage of contributing to individual differences in emotion regulation (Sherman et al, 2013, Waters et al, 2010) and stress responsivity (Champagne, Meaney, 2001, Fernald, Gunnar, 2009, Loman, Gunnar, 2010, Walker, 2010). Increased consumption of highly palatable foods in the face of strong emotions, often triggered by daily stressors, is thought to be a major factor contributing to obesity over time (Dallman et al., 2003). Given these practical and theoretical advantages, standardized assessments of attachment and maternal sensitivity have recently been included in large, systematic population studies of obesity risk. For example, Anderson and Whitaker in 2011, using a version of the Attachment Q-sort (van Ijzendoorn et al, 2004, Waters, Deane, 1985) in a large U.S. population sample, found that attachment insecurity measured at 24 months increased the risk of obesity at 54 months of age. This same team later showed that low maternal sensitivity in the pre-school years was an even stronger risk factor for the development of obesity in adolescence than insecure attachment (Anderson, Gooze, Lemeshow, & Whitaker, 2012). Wu, Dixon, Dalton, Tudiver, and Liu (2011) showed that the combination of low maternal sensitivity and a difficult child temperament predicted an increased risk of overweight-or-obesity during school age, but not in earlier childhood.

While these initial studies suggest that insecure attachment and low maternal sensitivity in pre-schoolers is a risk factor for later obesity, much more work is needed to replicate these findings in independent samples and to establish at what age these effects first come into play. For example, while Anderson et al. (2012) report a link between 24 month attachment behaviours and later obesity risk, extending this finding to interactions measured at 6 months of age might inform a different interventional approach implemented at a very different time in the emerging dyadic relationship. Another important question for this area of work is whether sex moderates the link between attachment and/or maternal sensitivity behaviours and later obesity risk. Anderson and Whitaker (2011) reported that sex did not moderate the association between insecure attachment and childhood obesity; however, they did not report on similar moderation effects related to maternal sensitivity and later weight gain (Anderson et al., 2012). Several authors have identified important sex differences associated with the early mother–child relationship and the development of social interactions (Biringen et al, 1994, Goldberg, Lewis, 1969, Gunnar, Donahue, 1980, Hinde, Stevenson-Hinde, 1987). Furthermore, several aspects of eating behaviour and weight gain may develop differently in girls and boys (Govindan et al, 2013, Suzuki et al, 2012). Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the link between maternal sensitivity and later obesity risk might differ in the two sexes.

The main goals of the current study were thus: 1) to examine the association between 6 month maternal sensitivity scores and body mass indices measured at 48 months of age in a new longitudinal study of developing children, thus extending the work of Anderson et al. to an earlier developmental stage, and 2) to assess whether sex might moderate this association. We hypothesized that exposure to low maternal sensitivity at age 6 months would be associated with higher child BMIs at age 48 months, and that sex would moderate this association i.e. that girls would show this association more so than boys. The latter was based on recent work demonstrating a link between social adversity and obesity risk in girls but not in boys at 5 years of age (Suglia et al., 2012). Differences in parental expectations, perceived roles and maternal behaviours towards boys and girls might also be contributory in this regard (Biringen et al, 1994, Carper et al, 2000, Elfhag, Linné, 2005, Goldberg, Lewis, 1969, Hinde, Stevenson-Hinde, 1987).

Section snippets

Participants and methods

The current study sample included 223 children recruited in either Montréal, Québec (N = 105) or Hamilton, Ontario (N = 118), Canada as part of an established prospective birth cohort, the Maternal Adversity, Vulnerability and Neurodevelopment (MAVAN) project. For the current analysis, all available participants who had been enrolled in the MAVAN study at birth, been scored for maternal sensitivity at 6 months of age and who had participated in a laboratory visit to measure growth at 48 months

Mother–child interaction using video-taping

For the purposes of assessing maternal sensitivity (appropriately, and timely response to infant signals) at 6 months, 30 minutes of non-feeding mother–infant interactions were videotaped in the home. The 6 month videos were entirely free-play. The recordings were later coded by staff that were independent from the MAVAN study and had no awareness of the primary study hypotheses. The instrument used was the 25 item Maternal Behaviour Q-sort (MBQS revised-25) which has been shown to correlate

Results

Table 1 summarizes the sample characteristics including potential covariates and provides the simple bivariate associations between each independent variable and 48 month BMI z scores.

As shown, there was a significant bivariate association between the SES/maternal education variable and 48 month BMI z scores, with high SES/high maternal education status being associated with lower 48 month BMI. Higher birth weight z scores and higher maternal BMI were both positively associated with 48 month

Discussion

The main goals of the current study were : 1) to examine the association between 6 month maternal sensitivity scores and body mass indices measured at 48 months of age in a new longitudinal study of developing children, thus extending the work of Anderson et al. to an earlier developmental stage, and 2) to assess whether sex might moderate this association. After controlling for covariates known to have a strong relationship with child BMI, we found a significant negative association between

References (54)

  • SinhaR. et al.

    Stress as a common risk factor for obesity and addiction

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • TarabulsyG.M. et al.

    Validation of a short version of the maternal behavior Q-sort applied to a brief video record of mother–infant interaction

    Infant Behavior and Development

    (2009)
  • AinsworthM.D.S. et al.

    On the shaping of attachment theory and research. An interview with Mary DS Ainsworth

    Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

    (1995)
  • AndersonS.E. et al.

    Quality of early maternal-child relationship and risk of adolescent obesity

    Paediatrics

    (2012)
  • AndersonS.E. et al.

    Attachment security and obesity in U.S. pre-school-aged children

    Archives Pediatric Adolescent Medicine

    (2011)
  • AnzmanS.L. et al.

    Parental influence on children's early eating environments and obesity risk. Implications for prevention

    International Journal of Obesity

    (2010)
  • Bakermans-KranenburgM.J. et al.

    Less is more. Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2003)
  • Bakermans-KranenburgM.J. et al.

    Disorganized infant attachment and preventive interventions. A review and meta-analysis

    Infant Mental Health Journal

    (2005)
  • BerthoudH.R. et al.

    Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity

    American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology

    (2011)
  • BiringenZ. et al.

    Maternal sensitivity in the second year. Gender-based relations in the dyadic balance of control

    American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

    (1994)
  • BlockR.W. et al.

    Failure to thrive as a manifestation of child neglect

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • BowlbyJ.
    (1973)
  • DallmanM.F. et al.

    Chronic stress and obesity. A new view of “comfort food”

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2003)
  • ElfhagK. et al.

    Gender differences in associations of eating pathology between mothers and their adolescent offspring

    Obesity Research

    (2005)
  • GoldbergS.

    Attachment and development

    (2000)
  • GoldbergS. et al.

    Behaviour in the year old infant. Gender differences

    Child Development

    (1969)
  • GovindanM. et al.

    Gender differences in physiologic markers and health behaviors associated with childhood obesity

    Pediatrics

    (2013)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Maternal sensitivity in early childhood and body mass index in adolescence: A population-based study on the role of self-regulation as a mediator

      2023, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, a study reported that children of authoritarian mothers (low sensitivity combined with high expectations for self-control) had the greatest odds of later overweight (Rhee et al., 2006). It has been suggested that the association is conditional on child sex, as parenting may impact BMI more in girls than boys, increasing the odds of overweight in girls (Wendland et al., 2014). There are several mechanisms through which parental sensitivity may be associated with children's weight development.

    • Contextual stress and maternal sensitivity: A meta-analytic review of stress associations with the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort in observational studies

      2018, Developmental Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      It predicts infant attachment security (Bailey, Redden, Pederson, & Moran, 2016; Bernier, Bélanger, Tarabulsy, Simard, & Carrier, 2014; De Wolff & van IJzendoorn, 1997; Moran, Pederson, Pettit, & Krupka, 1992; Pederson et al., 1990; Posada, Carbonell, Alzate, & Plata, 2004; Whipple, Bernier, & Mageau, 2011a), thereby laying foundations for socio-emotional competence across the life-course (Hazan & Shaver, 1994; Waters, Merrick, Treboux, Crowell, & Albersheim, 2000). Sensitivity is also relevant to a broad range of other offspring outcomes including executive function (Bernier, Carlson, Deschênes, & Matte-Gagné, 2012; Bernier, Carlson, & Whipple, 2010; Rochette & Bernier, 2014a); behavior problems (Bordeleau, Bernier, & Carrier, 2012b; Niccols & Feldman, 2006); sleep quality (Bordeleau, Bernier, & Carrier, 2012a); and, body mass index (Wendland et al., 2014, 2015). Maternal sensitivity is a behavioral indicator of a caregiver’s capacity to evaluate the type of care required by their child (Solomon & George, 1996) and involves the ability to perceive accurately and respond appropriately to the child’s attachment-based signals (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978).

    • Infant Regulatory Problems and Obesity in Early Childhood

      2017, Academic Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although no significant difference was observed in the aOR, it should be noted that the percentage of obese children was consistently higher among children of mothers with low maternal sensitivity (24% for difficult temperament and 19% for easy temperament) compared to high maternal sensitivity (20% and 15%, respectively). This finding is somewhat consistent with the extant literature, which shows that low maternal sensitivity is associated with higher obesity risk in difficult infants12,29 and with intervention studies showing a decrease in child adiposity by targeting parental response to difficult infant behaviors.20,21 Because the ITSC questionnaire had only a moderately high Cronbach's alpha, suggesting some variability between individual questions, we also conducted analyses of associations between particular regulation variables and preschool obesity.

    • Risk Factors for Childhood Obesity in the First 1,000 Days: A Systematic Review

      2016, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the ECLS-B, low maternal–infant relationship quality was associated with child overweight, but adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics accounted for results.291 Two studies292,293 found that lower maternal sensitivity, defined by observed maternal responsiveness to infant cues, was associated with later childhood overweight. Two studies examined facets of parent weight between birth and child age 24 months.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Acknowledgements: This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Susan Goldberg, our cherished friend and colleague who made a significant contribution to the work described in this manuscript. The MAVAN research is supported by multiple grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (to RDL, MJM, and ASF), as well as private support from the Faculty of Medicine, McGill University and the Norlien Foundation (Calgary, Alberta) and the WOCO Foundation (London, Ontario). In addition, this research has been supported by the SRC Travel Grant, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University (to BEW). We would like to thank Kimmi Labbett for her commitment to the behavioural coding of the maternal sensitivity component of the MAVAN project. As well, we would like to thank Jessica Grummitt for her commitment to managing the MAVAN Data Base associated with the work of Dr. Robert Levitan at CAMH, Toronto. In addition, we would like to thank Patricia Szymkow and Carmen MacPherson for their commitment to co-ordinating the MAVAN project in Hamilton, Ontario. Disclosure: The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

    1

    Maternal Adversity Vulnerability and Neurodevelopment.

    View full text