Original research
Comparison of Robotics, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Motor Learning Methods for Treatment of Persistent Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.022Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Objective

To compare response to upper-limb treatment using robotics plus motor learning (ML) versus functional electrical stimulation (FES) plus ML versus ML alone, according to a measure of complex functional everyday tasks for chronic, severely impaired stroke survivors.

Design

Single-blind, randomized trial.

Setting

Medical center.

Participants

Enrolled subjects (N=39) were >1 year postsingle stroke (attrition rate=10%; 35 completed the study).

Interventions

All groups received treatment 5d/wk for 5h/d (60 sessions), with unique treatment as follows: ML alone (n=11) (5h/d partial- and whole-task practice of complex functional tasks), robotics plus ML (n=12) (3.5h/d of ML and 1.5h/d of shoulder/elbow robotics), and FES plus ML (n=12) (3.5h/d of ML and 1.5h/d of FES wrist/hand coordination training).

Main Outcome Measures

Primary measure: Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT), with 13 complex functional tasks; secondary measure: upper-limb Fugl-Meyer coordination scale (FM).

Results

There was no significant difference found in treatment response across groups (AMAT: P≥.584; FM coordination: P≥.590). All 3 treatment groups demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in response to treatment (AMAT and FM coordination: P≤.009). A group treatment paradigm of 1:3 (therapist/patient) ratio proved feasible for provision of the intensive treatment. No adverse effects.

Conclusions

Severely impaired stroke survivors with persistent (>1y) upper-extremity dysfunction can make clinically and statistically significant gains in coordination and functional task performance in response to robotics plus ML, FES plus ML, and ML alone in an intensive and long-duration intervention; no group differences were found. Additional studies are warranted to determine the effectiveness of these methods in the clinical setting.

Keywords

Electric stimulation
FES
Randomized controlled trial, Rehabilitation
Robotics
Stroke
Upper extremity

List of abbreviations

AMAT
Arm Motor Ability Test
AMAT-F
AMAT Function scale
AMAT S/E
Arm Motor Ability Test for shoulder/elbow
AMAT S/E-F
AMAT S/E Function scale
AMAT W/H
Arm Motor Ability Test for wrist/hand
AMAT W/H-F
AMAT W/H Function scale
FES
functional electrical stimulation
FM
Fugl-Meyer
ML
motor learning

Cited by (0)

Current affiliations for Daly, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center of Excellence, Malcom Randall Gainesville Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL; and Brain Rehabilitation Research Program, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville FL.

Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs (grant nos. B2801R, B9024-S, and B5080S).

Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT01725659.

Disclosures: none.