Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Review articleSystematic Review of Self-Reported Prognosis in Adults After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
Section snippets
Methods
The literature search and critical review strategy are outlined in detail elsewhere. Briefly, the electronic databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched from January 1, 2001, to June 30, 2011.6 These searches were updated on February 10, 2012. The reference lists of all reviews and meta-analyses related to MTBI, and articles meeting the eligibility criteria were screened for additional studies. ICoMP members also provided studies they had knowledge
Results
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to 77,914 titles and abstracts, 2170 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. There were 173 eligible articles that assessed MTBI prognosis in adults, excluding studies of sport and military injuries, which are reported elsewhere.11, 12 Of the 173 articles on prognosis, 51 (29%) were evaluated as having a low risk of bias, and 21 of these included subjective, self-reported outcomes. The other studies reported on objective outcomes and
Discussion
Our results support the previous finding of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on MTBI that self-reported symptoms such as headache, fatigue, self-perceived cognitive deficits and other so-called postconcussion symptoms are common in the acute stage of injury but are not specific to MTBI.4 When compared with uninjured controls, patients with MTBI do report more postconcussion symptoms at 3 months21, 22 and at 1 year.36, 37 However, postconcussion symptoms are equally prevalent in those
Conclusions
Since the prognosis review of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force, there has been some progress in understanding MTBI prognosis. Our results add to the growing evidence that postconcussion symptoms are not specific to MTBI and occur commonly in the general population and after other nonhead injuries. Our results also confirm the importance of psychosocial determinants of recovery. We conclude that self-reported symptoms can be persistent after MTBI, and there is a need for more intervention
Acknowledgments
We thank the other members of ICoMP—Jean-Luc af Giejerstam, MD, PhD; Eleanor Boyle, PhD; Victor G. Coronado, MD, MPH; Alison K. Godbolt, MBChB, MD; Ryan Hung, MD, MSc; Michelle Keightley, PhD; Alvin Li, BHSc; Connie Marras, MD, PhD; Peter Rumney, MD; and Britt-Marie Stålnacke, MD, PhD—for their contribution to this work; Panos Lambiris, MSc, Information Scientist, University Health Network, for assisting in developing, testing, and updating the search strategies; and Meijia Zhou, BSc, for
References (44)
- et al.
Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, held in Zurich, November 2008
J Clin Neurosci
(2009) - et al.
Systematic search and review procedures: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
Systematic review of prognosis and return to play after sport concussion: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
Systematic review of prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in the military: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
Population-based, inception cohort study of the incidence, course, and prognosis of mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collisions
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
Mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collisions: what are the symptoms and who treats them? A population-based 1-year inception cohort study
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
Cognitive functioning and postconcussive symptoms in trauma patients with and without mild TBI
Arch Clin Neuropsychol
(2006) - et al.
A longitudinal, controlled study of patient complaints following treated mild traumatic brain injury
Arch Clin Neuropsychol
(2004) - et al.
Baseline predictors of fatigue 1 year after mild head injury
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2009)
Health status, not head injury, predicts concussion symptoms after minor injury
Am J Emerg Med
Symptom expectation after minor head injury. A comparative study between Canada and Lithuania
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
Quality of life and neuropsychological changes in mild head trauma. Late analysis and correlation with S100B protein and cranial CT scan performed at hospital admission
Injury
Predicting complaints of impaired cognitive functioning in patients with chronic pain
J Pain Symptom Manage
Traumatic brain injuries in a well-defined population: epidemiological aspects and severity
J Neurotrauma
Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
J Rehabil Med
Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
J Rehabil Med
Protocol for a systematic review of prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: an update of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force findings
Syst Rev
Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
J Rehabil Med
A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature
Spine
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
PLoS Med
Cited by (0)
Supported by the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (grant no. 2010-ABI-MTBIWHO-871). The funder was not involved in the design or preparation of the study protocol, or in the management of the project, analysis or interpretation of data, or the preparation of the final article.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
The findings and conclusions in this research are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the official views or policies of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or any agency of the United States government. Inclusion of individuals, programs, or organizations in this article does not constitute endorsement by the United States government.