Original article
Association of Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Health Care Access With Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Saunders LL, Krause JS, Acuna J. Association of race, socioeconomic status, and health care access with pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury.

Objective

To assess the associations of race and socioeconomic status (SES) with pressure ulcers (PUs) after accounting for health care access among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Large specialty hospital in the southeastern United States.

Participants

Persons with traumatic SCI who (1) had residual effects from their injury, (2) were 18 years or older at the time of the survey, and (3) were a year or more postinjury at the time of survey (N=2549).

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Outcomes were measured by a mail-in survey: having a current PU (yes vs no), having a PU in the past year with or without reduced sitting time (no PU, no reduced sitting time, month or less, ≥5wk), and having at least 1 PU surgery since SCI onset (yes vs no).

Results

Of participants, 39.3% reported a PU in the past year, 19.9% had a current PU, and 21.9% reported having had surgery for a PU since their SCI onset. While race was preliminarily associated with each PU outcome, it became nonsignificant after controlling for SES and health care access. In each analysis, household income was significantly associated with PU outcomes after controlling for demographic and injury factors and remained significant after accounting for the health care access factors. Persons with lower income had higher odds of each PU outcome. Health care access was not consistently related to PU outcomes.

Conclusions

Even after accounting for health care access, household income, a measure of SES, remained significantly associated with PU outcomes after SCI; however, race became nonsignificant.

Section snippets

Participants

After receiving approval from the institutional review board, participants were identified through the following 3 different sources of records at a large specialty hospital in the southeastern United States (1) SCI Model Systems patient database, (2) Model Systems registry, and (3) outpatient directory. Although participants were identified through one of the SCI Model Systems, our data were specifically collected for this study, and we did not use any of the data routinely collected by the

Results

Of 2549 participants, 75.2% were men and 72.3% were white. Average age ± SD at survey was 45.6±14.3y, and participants were, on average, 12.5±9.7y postinjury. Of the participants, 30.9% were ambulatory. Of those nonambulatory, 10.8% had a C1-4 level injury, 25.1% had a C5-8 level injury, and 33.3% had noncervical injuries. Having less than a high school degree was reported by 15.3% of participants, while 27.3% had at least a bachelor's degree. Twenty-two percent of participants reported average

Discussion

In our cohort, 39.3% of participants reported a PU in the past year, 19.9% had a current PU, and 21.9% reported having had surgery for a PU since SCI onset. We investigated the relationships of SES and health care access with these PU outcomes and found that, while income was consistently associated with PU outcomes, health care access was not. This study is the first, to our knowledge, to examine health care access with PU outcomes among an SCI population while also controlling for SES.

We

Conclusions

These results have shown the importance of SES, specifically annual household income, in relation to PU outcomes after SCI. While most of the health care access variables were not significantly associated with PU outcomes, we did find that having a personal doctor was associated with increased odds of having a PU in the past year and having a current PU. Health care providers should be aware of the increased risk of PU outcomes in lower SES populations, even after accounting for basic health

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Supported by the Department of Education, National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant nos. H133G050165, H133B090005, and H133A080064), and the National Institutes of Health (grant no. 1R01 NS 48117). However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education or National Institutes of Health, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

Reprints are not available from the author.

In-press corrected proof published online on Feb 15, 2012, at www.archives-pmr.org.

View full text