Epidemiology of exposure to blood borne pathogens on a surgical service

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.013

The American Journal of Surgery

Volume 192, Issue 5, November 2006, Pages e18-e21

Presented at the 30th Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of VA Surgeons, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 7–9, 2006

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.013 Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The goal of this study was to analyze the type and mechanism of blood exposure injuries on the surgical service in order to develop appropriate preventative strategies.

Methods

A retrospective review of all exposure injuries affecting members of the operative care line at a single teaching institution between December 2002 and December 2005 was performed.

Results

Of 98 exposure injuries on the surgical service, only 17(17%) were inflicted by hollow-bore needles. Seventy-four (76%) of these reported injuries occurred in the operating room (OR) and 24 (24%) occurred in other clinical areas. Sharps injuries accounted for 69 (93%) of OR injuries and were inflicted by suture needles (n = 37, 50%), hollow-bore needles (n = 7, 9%), and sharp instruments (n = 25, 34%). Mucocutaneous contamination accounted for 5 (7%) of the OR exposures. Professionals most frequently injured were residents (n = 43, 44%), followed by nurses (n = 28, 29%), students (n = 17, 17%) and other healthcare workers (n = 10, 10%).

Conclusions

Blood exposure prevention strategies should be directed at safety within the surgical field and focused beyond hollow-bore needle stick injuries to include education, mentoring, and competency training.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

The records of the safety officer at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center were reviewed to identify all injuries affecting members of the Operative Care Line between December 2002 and December 2005. All records were anonymous with no personal identification information. Data collected included professional classification of the exposed surgical team member, mechanism of injury, time of occurrence, and location of injury.

Results

There was a total of 98 reported blood exposure injuries over the period studied. Of the total injuries, only 17 (17%) were inflicted by hollow-bore needles. This injury was usually sustained during activities such as blood draws, needle disposal, recapping, and injection. The other types of injuries are displayed in Fig. 1. The majority 74 (76%) of injuries occurred in the operating room (OR) (Fig. 2) and this was statistically significant (P < .001). The remaining 24 (24%) exposures occurred

Comments

Our study revealed that nearly three quarters of episodes of exposure to blood-borne pathogens occurred in the OR. The OR is the hospital environment with the greatest concentration of sharp instruments, with many different team members handling them in a limited space under stressful situations. Blood exposure to OR personnel has been reported to occur in 6.4% to 50% of surgical cases [5], [6]. The corresponding sharps injury rates were 1.7% to 15% [5], [6]. The likelihood of blood

References (20)

R. Berguer et al.
Strategies for preventing sharps injuries in the operating room
Surg Clin North Am
(2005)
R. Berguer et al.
Preventing sharps injury in the operating room
J Am Coll Surg
(2004)
J.M.J. Patterson et al.
Needle stick injuries among medical students
Am J Infect Control
(2003)
T. Laine et al.
How often does glove perforation occur in surgery?Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system
Am J Surg
(2001)
P. Lynch et al.
Perioperative blood contact and exposures: a comparison of incident reports and focused studies
Am J Infect Control
(1993)
Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 36(suppl...
Occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens; needle stick and other sharps injuries; final rule. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor. Final rule; request for comment on the Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Fed Regist
(2001)
J.L. Gerberding et al.
Risk of exposure of surgical personnel to patients’ blood during surgery at San Francisco General Hospital
N Engl J Med
(1990)
E.J. Quebbeman et al.
Risk of blood contamination and injury to operating room personnel
Ann Surg
(1991)
J.M. Jagger et al.
A study of patterns and prevention of blood exposures in OR personnel
AORN J
(1998)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

Suture-TOOL: A suturing device for swift and standardized abdominal aponeurosis closure
2022, Surgery in Practice and Science
Surgeons can reduce incisional hernia formation by adhering to standardized techniques for incisional wound closure. This is often neglected by the time a long operation is to be ended and can lead to the risk of developing an incisional hernia or a wound rupture. To address this issue, a suturing machine (Suture-TOOL) was developed for swift and standardized abdominal closure. The aim was to compare the user safety, speed, and suturing quality between Suture-TOOL and manual Needle-Driver suturing.
Fifteen surgeons who were specialists in surgery, urology, and gynaecology as well as surgical trainees were invited. The Suture-TOOL was presented to the surgeons who read the instructions for use before starting the test. Each surgeon closed nine 15 cm-long incisions in a human body model; six with Suture-TOOL and three with the Needle-Driver technique. Gloves were examined for puncture damage. Endpoints were suture-length/wound-length (SL/WL)-ratio, closure time, number of stitches, learning curve, and glove puncture rate. A VAS-evaluation concerning different Suture-Tool user impressions was completed.
A SL/WL-ratio ≥4 was 98% for Suture-TOOL versus 69% for Needle-Driver (p < 0.001). Suture time was shorter for Suture-TOOL (p < 0.001). Wound stitch count was higher for Needle-Driver (p = 0.013). The median SL/WL-ratio was similar between groups. The learning curve plateaued after three closures using Suture-TOOL. Two glove punctures were detected—all in the Needle-Driver group. Suture-TOOL received high VAS scores for all measured functionalities.
Suture-TOOL is a promising device for clinical use. It is safe, easy, and fast resulting in a high-quality suture lines with a short learning curve and a high functionality ranking.
Evaluation of bloodborne pathogen exposures at an urban hospital
2013, American Journal of Infection Control
Evaluation of an antimicrobial surgical glove to inactivate live human immunodeficiency virus following simulated glove puncture
2013, Surgery (United States)
Citation Excerpt :
A pioneering study published in 1991 at the Medical College of Wisconsin found a high risk for injury and blood exposure among surgical personnel in approximately 50% of elective surgical procedures.18 A study conducted in a single teaching institution between 2002 and 2005 found that approximately 50% of injuries in the operating room were caused by suture needles, whereas scalpel blades, injection needles, bone fragments, wires, and other objects were responsible for the other half of reported sharps injuries.19 Unfortunately, not all sharps injuries resulting in intraoperative blood exposure are at first glance obvious to the members of the surgical team.
Percutaneous injuries associated with cutting instruments, needles, and other sharps (eg, metallic meshes, bone fragments, etc) occur commonly during surgical procedures, exposing members of surgical teams to the risk for contamination by blood-borne pathogens. This study evaluated the efficacy of an innovative integrated antimicrobial glove to reduce transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) following a simulated surgical-glove puncture injury.
A pneumatically activated puncturing apparatus was used in a surgical-glove perforation model to evaluate the passage of live HIV-1 virus transferred via a contaminated blood-laden needle, using a reference (standard double-layer glove) and an antimicrobial benzalkonium chloride (BKC) surgical glove. The study used 2 experimental designs. In method A, 10 replicates were used in 2 cycles to compare the mean viral load following passage through standard and antimicrobial gloves. In method B, 10 replicates were pooled into 3 aliquots and were used to assess viral passage though standard and antimicrobial test gloves. In both methods, viral viability was assessed by observing the cytopathic effects in human lymphocytic C8166 T-cell tissue culture. Concurrent viral and cell culture viability controls were run in parallel with the experiment's studies.
All controls involving tissue culture and viral viability were performed according to study design. Mean HIV viral loads (log₁₀TCID₅₀) were significantly reduced (P < .01) following passage through the BKC surgical glove compared to passage through the nonantimicrobial glove. The reduction (log reduction and percent viral reduction) of the HIV virus ranged from 1.96 to 2.4 and from 98.9% to 99.6%, respectively, following simulated surgical-glove perforation.
Sharps injuries in the operating room pose a significant occupational risk for surgical practitioners. The findings of this study suggest that an innovative antimicrobial glove was effective at significantly (P < .01) reducing the risk for blood-borne virus transfer in a model of simulated glove perforation.
Incidence and patterns of needlestick injuries during intermaxillary fixation
2011, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) carries an appreciable risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne viruses. Our aim was to establish the incidence and patterns of needlestick injuries during IMF at DAV Dental College. We surveyed 12 residents working in the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery for 1 year (December 2008 to December 2009) to find out how many injuries occurred during IMF. A total of 40 needlestick injuries were recorded during 172 IMF procedures (23%). Most injuries occurred in the maxillary left quadrant (n = 16, 40%). Procedures done during the night had a much higher incidence (13/29, 45%) compared with 27/153 (18%) done during the day. Of the 40 injuries, 31 (78%) were recorded as superficial, the rest being deep. All injuries affected the non-working hand, and 39 (98%) were caused by a wire. Surgeons are at high risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne viruses from needlestick injuries during IMF. Detailed attention to the pattern of these injuries could help to develop improved strategies to minimise the incidence.
Occupational Exposure of Health Care Personnel to Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C: Prevention and Surveillance Strategies
2010, Clinics in Liver Disease
Citation Excerpt :
NaSH data have shown that 28% of injuries were reported in operating theaters.7 In other studies examining the risk of injury in operating theaters, 93% of injuries were sharps related, and in half of those injuries, suture needles were implicated.43,44 According to one study from the 1990s, percutaneous injuries were reported in 7% to 10% of all gynecologic surgeries.17
Accidental exposures to blood and body fluid in the operation room and the issue of underreporting
2009, American Journal of Infection Control
A retrospective review of all exposure injuries affecting members of the operative care line at a single university hospital between January 2000 and December 2007 was performed. A questionnaire survey on current status of adherence to barrier precautions was also completed by 164 staff members. Of 136 exposure injuries, 87 (64.0%) were in surgeons, and 49 (36.0%) were in scrub nurses. Surgeons were most commonly injured during suturing (49, 56%), followed by “handing over sharps” (7, 8%), whereas scrub nurses were most commonly injured during “counting and sorting of sharps” (15, 41%), followed by “handing over sharps,” and “splash.” The questionnaire survey revealed that compliance with goggles, face shields, and double gloving was poor, and only 9% of respondents routinely used the hands-free technique. Only 22% of staff who had experienced exposure injuries reported every incident. Because circumstances of exposure injuries in operating rooms differ by profession, appropriate preventive measures should address individual situations. To reduce exposure injuries in the operating room, further efforts are required including education, mentoring, and competency training for operation personnel.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Poster presentationEpidemiology of exposure to blood borne pathogens on a surgical service

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Results

Comments

Surg Clin North Am

J Am Coll Surg

Am J Infect Control

Am J Surg

Am J Infect Control

Occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens; needle stick and other sharps injuries; final rule. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor. Final rule; request for comment on the Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

Fed Regist

Risk of exposure of surgical personnel to patients’ blood during surgery at San Francisco General Hospital

N Engl J Med

Risk of blood contamination and injury to operating room personnel

Ann Surg

A study of patterns and prevention of blood exposures in OR personnel

AORN J

Poster presentation
Epidemiology of exposure to blood borne pathogens on a surgical service