Review and Special Articles
Leveraging Human-Centered Design in Chronic Disease Prevention

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.014Get rights and content

Bridging the knowing–doing gap in the prevention of chronic disease requires deep appreciation and understanding of the complexities inherent in behavioral change. Strategies that have relied exclusively on the implementation of evidence-based data have not yielded the desired progress. The tools of human-centered design, used in conjunction with evidence-based data, hold much promise in providing an optimal approach for advancing disease prevention efforts. Directing the focus toward wide-scale education and application of human-centered design techniques among healthcare professionals will rapidly multiply their effective ability to bring the kind of substantial results in disease prevention that have eluded the healthcare industry for decades. This, in turn, would increase the likelihood of prevention by design.

Introduction

Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are the dominant global health challenge of the present era.1 In 1969, the WHO Executive Board2 warned that cardiovascular disease, a major portion of total NCDs, would become one of the greatest epidemics mankind has faced unless research is focused on its cause and prevention. The WHO was correct. Now, 45 years later, NCDs account for 63% of deaths worldwide, half of which are cardiovascular.1 The NCD epidemic is no longer just a Western phenomenon: 80% of NCD-related deaths, especially premature deaths, occur in low- and middle-income countries.1 It can be difficult, in the face of remarkable advances in disease treatment, to understand why morbidity and mortality stemming from such preventable diseases continue to rise globally.

The current situation is most certainly not due to lack of effort. Vast volumes of research data, numerous position statements, as well as reports, guidelines, and comprehensive strategies from high-ranking agencies have been disseminated. Solutions stemming from these various benchmarks include directed education, mass media campaigns, counseling, technology applications, advocacy, promotion, worksite interventions, and public policy. Although these have met varying levels of success, none would be considered substantial.3 The reductionist approach to problem solving has been highly successful in providing evidence for effective chronic disease prevention through diet, exercise, and cessation of smoking and substance abuse. However, reductionism is not ideally suited for acting upon what the research data is telling us to do.4 This presents a challenge because the principles of reductionism form the foundation for the way most scientists and healthcare professionals are taught to think. What is needed is to augment, not replace, reductive thinking with abductive thinking. As Brown5 points out, the “sweet spot” for innovation is at the overlap of reductive and abductive thinking. This other way of solving problems, known as design thinking or human-centered design (HCD), combines critical and creative thinking, and is fast becoming a core 21st-century skill in many industries. This skill would be a valuable additional tool for healthcare professionals attempting to implement preventive programs.

As Martin6 and Gawande7 note, people working in and for large systems tend to stay within their comfort zones, defaulting to familiar tools and approaches, especially when the stakes are high, as they are with NCDs. This tendency can seriously limit the potential for innovation in chronic disease prevention. But there are bright spots. The Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers in New Jersey reduced patients’ emergency room (ER) and hospital visits by 40% with a 56% reduction in hospital bills.8 In Atlantic City, the Special Care Center reduced their ER visits and hospital visits by 40%.9 Both clinics, the Special Care Center and the Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers, used patient-centered health care in coordination with traditional medicine to elicit behavioral change.8, 9

Immediate progress in chronic disease prevention can be made by broadening the abilities of medical professionals and scientists to include methods that deepen their empathy and understanding of the human factors governing the motivations and desires of their patients. Building on these insights, medical professionals and scientists can then use HCD methods to design and test desirable and viable solutions for their patients. HCD, as a discipline to complement existing approaches,10 offers the additional capability needed to achieve the results being sought for in disease prevention.

This paper describes some of the factors that have stalled progress in prevention and discusses the potential benefits of HCD, a discipline that, when combined with current methods of disease prevention, has the ability to effect the behavioral change necessary for implementation of existing medical evidence.

Section snippets

The Knowing–Doing Gap

The foundation of the solution to chronic disease prevention is the requirement to change human behavior. Reducing inactivity, increasing healthy eating, cessation of smoking, and reducing alcohol abuse are well-known, evident strategies reflected repeatedly in various recommendations and position statements. But for these to be realized and produce actual positive health outcomes at the individual and community levels, a new approach to the problem is needed. The tools and methods currently

Displaced Accountability Leads to Fragmentation Instead of Collaboration

A symptom of using reductionist thinking to bridge the knowing–doing gap is the tendency to displace accountability when progress stalls.12 Common targets for blame are the healthcare industry,13, 14 medical school training,15 the food industry,16, 17, 18 governments,19, 20 and even patients.21, 22 Accepting statements such as “there’s no money for prevention” or “the food industry is marketing unhealthy choices,” even though there is a shred of truth to them, produces imaginary barriers

Human-Centered Design

HCD is a systematic approach to problem solving that holds empathy at its core and encourages its practitioners to return repeatedly to the context, emotions, needs, and desires of the key stakeholders they are developing their solutions for. An example is Doug Dietz, a principle designer at General Electric (GE), who revolutionized the MRI experience for children after observing their fear and reluctance undergoing the procedure for which 80% required conscious sedation. He inspired his team

The Future of Innovation—Taking the Next Step

Indiscriminate trust in expert research and evidence should alarm us, considering that data accumulation and awareness of such evidence does not equate to change27 and behavioral change is critical to reducing morbidity and mortality rates from chronic disease. As Martin6 points out, a detailed or comprehensive plan devised using known approaches from within human “comfort traps” is not strategy at all. Plans such as the 7 Investments48 or scaling implementation through technology49 are at risk

Conclusions

There is no doubt that the prevention of chronic disease is a complex problem. There is also little doubt that the level of progress made over the past four decades is insufficient. The combination of analytic and human-centered approaches offers the best approach for innovation: prevention by design.33 The tools of HCD can be taught in conjunction with evidence-based medicine on a wide scale to healthcare professionals. This holds the promise of rapidly multiplying the ability to bring the

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the research assistance of Stanford University undergraduate students Edmund Posadas, Andrew Logan, Heydi Malave, and Maya Faison, as well as Dr. Dawn Carr, of the Stanford Longevity Center. CP is the CEO of LUMA Institute, a for-profit company that provides education services in human-centered design.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References (52)

  • I.M. Vuori et al.

    Physical activity promotion in the health care system

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (2013)
  • Alwan A, Armstrong T, Bettcher D, et al. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health...
  • Conference on the Prevention and Control of Major Cardiovascular Diseases (2d 1973 Brussels). WHO Regional Office for...
  • H.H.Q. Heng

    The conflict between complex systems and reductionism

    JAMA

    (2008)
  • T. Brown

    Change by design: how design thinking can transform organizations and inspire innovation

    (2009)
  • R.L. Martin

    The big lie of strategic planning

    Harv Bus Rev

    (2014)
  • A. Gawande

    Slow ideas

    The New Yorker, Annals of Medicine

    (July 29, 2013)
  • J. Brenner

    Reforming Camdenʼs Health care system—one patient at a time

    Prescriptions for Excellence in Health Care (newsletter from a collaboration between Jefferson School of Population Health and Lilly USA, LLC)

    (2009)
  • Can health care quality improve and cost decrease? Pilot Project in Atlantic City may show the way. Robert Wood Johnson...
  • A taxonomy of innovation

    Harv Bus Rev

    (2014)
  • J. Pfeffer et al.

    The knowing-doing gap how smart companies turn knowledge into action

    (2000)
  • R. Weiler et al.

    Is the lack of physicial activity strategy for children complicit mass child neglect?

    Br J Sports Med

    (2014)
  • R. Weiler et al.

    Do all health care professionals have a responsibility to prescribe and promote regular physical activity: or let us carry on doing nothing

    Curr Sports Med Rep

    (2013)
  • M. Heineman et al.

    Escape fire: the fight to rescue american healthcare [DVD]

    (2013)
  • R. Weiler et al.

    Physical activity education in the undergraduate curricula of all UK medical schools: are tomorrowʼs doctors equipped to follow clinical guidelines?

    Br J Sports Med

    (2012)
  • D. Stuckler et al.

    Big food, food systems, and global health

    PLoS Med

    (2012)
  • Harnessing the power of supermarkets to help reverse childhood obesity

    (2011)
  • Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: solving the weight of the nation

    (2012)
  • R. Weiler et al.

    Physical activity in the UK: a unique crossroad?

    Br J Sports Med

    (2010)
  • Technologies for global health. [Editorial]. Lancet 2012;380(9840):447....
  • P. Elwood et al.

    Healthy lifestyles reduce the incidence of chronic diseases and dementia: evidence from the caerphilly cohort study

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • D. Wikler

    Personal and social responsibility for health

    Ethics Int Aff

    (2006)
  • EU Working Group. “Sport & Health.” EU physical activity guidelines: recommended policy actions in support of...
  • Active Canada 20/20: a physical activity strategy & change agenda for Canada creating a culture of an active nation....
  • Oxford dictionary of English

    (2010)
  • Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases

    (2013)
  • Cited by (85)

    • Development and usage of a health recommendation web tool (HeaRT) designed to inform women of personalized preventive health recommendations

      2023, Internet Interventions
      Citation Excerpt :

      Implementation of guidelines for evidence-based screening and disease prevention remains a core challenge in health care (Matheson et al., 2015).

    • Dual Protection Messaging for Adolescents and Young Adults in the Setting of Over-the-Counter Hormonal Contraception: A Human-Centered Design Approach

      2022, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For AYAs in particular, services have not always been designed with accessibility, acceptability, or appropriateness in mind.19,20 Human-centered design is a participatory research approach that is increasingly being used in health care to ensure interventions are developed with the input of the ultimate end user at every step of problem definition, idea generation, and prototype development.21-24 This process ensures that inclusion of insights from stakeholders is prioritized to help identify key elements of the proposed interventions.25,26

    • Course experiences that promote and inhibit human-centered design

      2024, International Journal of Technology and Design Education
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text