Research articleMass Media Interventions to Reduce Youth Smoking Prevalence
Introduction
Cigarette smoking among young people is an important public health issue because of the serious health consequences of a lifetime cigarette smoking habit. Despite several years of decline, use of cigarettes in the past 30 days was estimated in the U.S. to be about 6% for Grade 8, 13% for Grade 10, and 20% for Grade 12 students during 2009.1 Cigarette use has risen sharply among young people in many other countries.2 In view of these concerns, continued improvement in methods to reduce youth smoking is important.
The range of methods capable of reducing youth smoking includes policy strategies that change environmental contingencies and educational and mass media strategies designed to directly influence knowledge, beliefs, skills, and social norms. Policies that raise cigarette prices have a substantial impact on youth smoking.3 Evidence for the impact of educational strategies is not as consistent in demonstrating long-term effects.4, 5 Mass media campaigns are among the strategies most often recommended for tobacco control because of the strength of the evidence of effectiveness and the large population impact of even small individual changes that may result.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 There is probably a need for all of these approaches because policy success depends on supportive populations, and individual decisions about smoking are influenced by well-targeted policies.
A previous study conducted during the late 1980s demonstrated positive effects on youth smoking prevalence of a combined mass media– and school-based intervention.13 The present study tested the impact of similar mass media interventions without a dedicated school intervention in an environment that featured a broader array of tobacco control activity at the national, state, and local levels. Theory-based hypotheses for the present study14 stated that the interventions would decrease perceptions of smoking prevalence among young people; increase perceptions of disapproval; increase confidence in ability to refuse cigarettes; decrease positive outcome expectations for smoking; increase negative outcome expectations; and decrease prevalence of self-reported smoking. These hypotheses also were framed as educational objectives for the media messages used in the interventions.
Section snippets
Methods
Four matched pairs of medium-sized metropolitan areas (designated market areas [DMAs]) were identified in four states (Florida, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin). These DMA pairs were selected as best matches based on population size, media resources, household income, adult educational attainment, and representation of African-American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white youth. Recruitment of school districts within DMAs focused on districts serving lower-income and lower-education
Results
The 2001 baseline survey was completed by 19,966 of 30,499 eligible students attending 99 middle and high schools in the eight DMAs; response rates were similar in intervention (61.3%) and comparison (69.7%) DMAs. The 2005 follow-up survey was completed by 23,246 students attending 98 of the same schools with response rates of 80.2% for intervention and 82.9% for comparison DMAs. Differences in data collection processes described in the methods section and improved implementation of parental
Discussion
Results of the experiment provided no evidence that these mass media interventions by themselves had an impact on cigarette smoking prevalence, intentions, or hypothesized mediators in community populations of Grade 7–12 youth. Hispanic student results suggested positive effects. Four matched pairs of media markets in four states were randomized to intervention or control conditions within states. The intervention systematically targeted youth audiences at the ages when young people are most
Conclusion
A cluster randomized, multi-community test of the impact of intensive mass media interventions over 4 years was not effective by itself in reducing youth smoking prevalence at a greater rate than the favorable trends seen in the U.S. during that time. A relatively strong tobacco control environment, including a substantial national media campaign concurrent with these interventions, and a rapidly changing set of media choices likely affected the results. These findings suggested the importance
References (35)
- et al.
Patterns of global tobacco use in young people and implications for future chronic disease burden in adults
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up
J Adolesc Health
(2005) - et al.
Development of a smoking prevention mass media program using diagnostic and formative research
Prev Med
(1988) - et al.
The influence of the national truth campaign on smoking initiation
Am J Prev Med
(2009) Monitoring the future
Tobacco policy research: insights and contributions to public health policy
The promise of long-term effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention programs: a critical review of reviews
Tob Induc Dis
(2009)Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs—2007
(2007)Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
Am J Prev Med
(2001)- et al.
Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2000)
Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions
Tob Control
Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: a review
J Health Commun
The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use—tobacco control monograph 19
A mass media programme to prevent smoking among adolescents: costs and cost effectiveness
Tob Control
Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs
Am J Public Health
How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: social cognitive theory
Youth audience segmentation strategies for smoking-prevention mass media campaigns based on message appeal
Health Educ Behav
Cited by (25)
Summary and Concluding Remarks: Patterns of Birth Cohort‒Specific Smoking Histories
2023, American Journal of Preventive MedicineThank you for not smoking – A multi-method investigation to understand the effect of anti-smoking warnings in television programs
2021, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, this strategy is gaining popularity due to its cost-effectiveness (Fishman et al., 2005). Therefore, several studies have researched the effectiveness of such campaigns on viewers according to demographic parameters such as race (Cowell, Farrelly, Chou, & Vallone, 2009; Flynn et al., 2010), gender (Hafstad & Aar0′, L. E., Engeland, A., Andersen, A., Langmark, F., & Stray-Pedersen, B. , 1997), socio-economic status (Flynn et al., 2010; Vallone, Allen, & Xiao, 2009), and population density (Duke et al., 2009; Zollinger, Saywell, Overgaard, Przybylski, & Dutta-Bergman, 2006). Related research has also tried to understand the effectiveness of different forms of media campaign.
The effect of interpersonal communication in tobacco control campaigns: A longitudinal mediation analysis of a Ghanaian adolescent population
2021, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :One of the few reviews performed to assess the quality of tobacco control evaluation programs identified only seven studies utilizing rigorous controlled trial designs (Brinn et al., 2012). Of these, only three (Flynn et al., 1995; Hafstad and Aaro, 1997; Longshore et al., 2006) concluded that mass media was associated with reduced smoking among young people; the other four found no effect (Bauman et al., 1991; Flay et al., 1995; Flynn et al., 2010; Worden et al., 1988). None of these studies, however, were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, further demonstrating the need for research in this area.
The effects of TV unhealthy food brand placement on children. Its separate and joint effect with advertising
2015, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :For those interested in targeting child audiences the combined use of different tools (as well as diverse media) should be considered as relevant in order to increase the effect in the audience. This is particularly relevant for programs devoted to health promotion because the public sector has scarcely used more sophisticated communication campaigns (Flynn et al., 2010; Randolph & Viswanath, 2004). In addition, these results provide new insights for the development of an adequate self-regulation of the industry.