Basic Mapping Principles for Visualizing Cancer Data Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.007

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volume 30, Issue 2, Supplement, February 2006, Pages S25-S36

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.007 Get rights and content

Abstract

Maps and other data graphics may play a role in generating ideas and hypotheses at the beginning of a project. They are useful as part of analyses for evaluating model results and then at the end of a project when researchers present their results and conclusions to varied audiences, such as their local research group, decision makers, or a concerned public. Cancer researchers are gaining skill with geographic information system (GIS) mapping as one of their many tools and are broadening the symbolization approaches they use for investigating and illustrating their data. A single map is one of many possible representations of the data, so making multiple maps is often part of a complete mapping effort. Symbol types, color choices, and data classing each affect the information revealed by a map and are best tailored to the specific characteristics of data. Related data can be examined in series with coordinated classing and can also be compared using multivariate symbols that build on the basic rules of symbol design. Informative legend wording and setting suitable map projections are also basic to skilled mapmaking.

Introduction

A geographic information system (GIS) allows epidemiologists and cancer researchers to investigate spatial patterns within their data and understand relationships between cancer and other health, socioeconomic, and environmental variables. High-quality maps also allow researchers to present a compelling case to others who are interested in their work. GIS is an additional tool in the exploration, analysis, and communication of cancer data, and knowledge of the basic principles for representing data can help cancer researchers make the most of GIS and the opportunities for insight it offers.

This article is structured in three sections: mapping methods, mapping multiple variables, and map finishing. Two common symbol types, choropleth mapping and proportional symbols, are featured, and decisions involved in making effective use of these symbols are summarized. Supporting figures present maps of prostate cancer data to correspond with the topic of this special issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. These maps were produced in ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands CA, version 9) with no further augmentation in illustration software. The data and geography used for these maps are from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Mortality Maps and Graphs Website.¹ The available years of prostate cancer mortality data are mapped (aggregations for 1950–1994), drawing from the counts, rates per 100,000 person-years (age adjusted using 1970 populations), and upper and lower bounds of 95% conference interval (CI) offered on the site for black and white races. The map area is cropped to produce compact demonstration figures that can be compared in series. The data are freely available through the NCI website to other mapmakers who would like to work with the methods described.

The basic overview of thematic mapping offered in this article has wide application in cancer and epidemiologic mapping. Other tools in GIS are also of use to epidemiologists, such as address geocoding and network analysis. The links between spatial statistics software tools and GIS are also improving.² The focus of this short article, however, is limited to symbolizing statistical data, which is a common use of GIS. Basic criteria for choosing symbols to map derived values, significance levels, model results, and smoothed rates are the same as for simpler measures such as crude rates. Likewise, multivariate maps that combine or overlay model results with original data or related variables can illuminate relationships between them by combining symbolization approaches.

Cartographers use visual tools, and epidemiologists use statistical tools to investigate their data. This is an oversimplification, to be sure, but it seems to be a core difference in approach between the two fields and each could be enhanced by further use of the other’s methods. The tools cartographers use to improve their visual representations of data can complement epidemiologists’ sophisticated adjustments for potentially spurious rates and small numbers. For example, cartographers adjust class breaks when mapping a given data set. Epidemiologists adjust the data while mapping with a given classing algorithm without adjustment, such as quantiles. Epidemiologists question the data; cartographers question the symbolization. This contrast is exaggerated in the hope that this brief introduction will encourage epidemiologists to expand their insights from data by expanding their approaches to data representation.

Section snippets

Mapping Methods

A basic characteristic of cancer data that guides choice of a map symbol is whether categories or quantities are recorded. Categorical differences in cancer may be case/control or benign/malignant. They may code race differences (Figure 1) as well as many other socioeconomic categories. Quantitative data may be counts, ranks, or derived values such as rates and percentages (Figure 2).

Symbols that show categorical differences well are color hue and symbol shape. Symbols well suited to

Mapping Multiple Variables

Improved representations of data and relationships between cancer variables may be revealed by overlaying symbols for one variable onto those of another; mapping related variables as a series; mapping differences, modeled indices, residuals, or other derived values; and mapping with symbols that combine variables. Examples of these approaches are described in this section.

Map Finishing

Guidelines for mapmakers often do not discuss the seemingly trivial issues of map titles and legend titles or issues of file export. The look and credibility of final maps are also affected by selecting a map projection suited to the area mapped. These are keys to making a map that can be understood, be presented in multiple media, and be distributed to a wide audience.

Conclusion

Maps and other data graphics can play a role in generating ideas and hypotheses at the beginning of a project. They are useful as part of analyses for evaluating model results and then at the end of a project when researchers present their results and conclusions to varied audiences, such as their local research group, decision makers, or a concerned public. Cancer researchers are gaining skill with GIS mapping as one of their many tools and are broadening the symbolization approaches they use

References (26)

Cancer mortality maps and graphs
(1999)
L. Wiggins
Using geographic information systems technology in the collection, analysis, and presentation of cancer registry dataa handbook of basic practices
(2002)
T.A. Slocum et al.
Thematic cartography and geographic visualization
(2005)
F.P. Boscoe et al.
Choosing geographic units for choropleth rate maps, with an emphasis on public health applications
Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci
(2003)
C.A. Brewer et al.
ColorBrewer in printA catalog of color schemes for maps
Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci
(2003)
M.A. Harrower et al.
ColorBrewer.organ online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps
Br Cartogr Soc
(2003)
C.A. Brewer et al.
Mapping mortalityevaluating color schemes for choropleth maps
Ann Assoc Am Geogr
(1997)
C.A. Brewer
Spectral schemesControversial color use on maps
Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci
(1997)
J.M. Olson et al.
An evaluation of color selections to accommodate map users with color-vision impairments
Ann Assoc Am Geogr
(1997)
C.A. Brewer
Guidelines for selecting colors for diverging schemes on maps
Br Cartogr Soc
(1996)

C.A. Brewer et al.

Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series

Ann Assoc Am Geogr

(2002)

C.A. Brewer

Reflections on mapping Census 2000

Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci

(2001)

M.T. Gastner et al.

Maps and cartograms of the 2004 U.S. presidential election results

(2004)

Cited by (93)

Hydrochemical properties of groundwater and land use and land cover changes impact on agricultural productivity: An empirical observation and integrated framework approaches
2024, Journal of Geochemical Exploration
Land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics of the Bankura district effect groundwater resources and agricultural productivity, particularly the expansion of urban land, discharge of fertiliser mixed water from agriculture and reduction of scrubland. This study investigates the Spatio-temporal relation between groundwater qualities (GWQ), LULC and agricultural productivity of the Bankura district in 2009 and 2020. The twelve standard water qualities parameters; “pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium (Ca²⁺), magnesium (Mg²⁺), sodium (Na⁺), potassium (K⁺), iron (Fe³⁺), bicarbonate (HCO₃¯), chloride (Cl⁻), sulfate (SO₄²⁻), nitrate (NO₃⁻), and fluoride (F⁻)” were considered for the study. Landsat-5, 7 and 8 images were classified for 2009 and 2020 to detect LULC dynamics related to GWQ. The results showed that GWQ was depleted in 2020 compared to 2009, with agricultural land suffering from lower GWQ than other land uses. Some of the water quality indices (Mean value of pH, EC, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and NO₃⁻) drastically declined in 2020 compared to 2009. The degree of contamination (CD) analysis showed the above value of zero (>CD) is highly vulnerable for dug well users. The mean nitrate (7.281 to 51.387 mg/l), calcium (38.366 to 58.082 mg/l), chloride (121.861 to 125.981 mg/l), and potassium (15.261 to 18.363 mg/l) concentration levels drastically increase over the agricultural land. To know the relationship between LULC and agriculture productivity, block-wise production and yield analysis of both years have been presented. It was seen that there are low crop and high productivity observed from the 2009 to 2015 block of Bankura. The overall result indicates that human activities are the primary cause of spatial-temporal changes in GWQ and agricultural productivity. The geospatial-based water quality assessment benefited in understanding changes in GWQ and developing appropriate site-specific agricultural and health policies.
Spatial epidemiology: An empirical framework for syndemics research
2022, Social Science and Medicine
Syndemics framework describes two or more co-occurring epidemics that synergistically interact with each other and the complex structural social forces that sustain them leading to excess disease burden. The term syndemic was first used to describe the interaction between substance abuse, violence, and AIDS by Merrill Singer. A broader range of syndemic studies has since emerged describing the framework's applicability to other public health scenarios. With syndemic theory garnering significant attention, the focus is shifting towards developing robust empirical analytical approaches. Unfortunately, the complex nature of the disease-disease interactions nested within several social contexts complicates empirical analyses. In answering the call to analyze syndemics at the population level, we propose the use of spatial epidemiology as an empirical framework for syndemics research.
Spatial epidemiology, which typically relies on geographic information systems (GIS) and statistics, is a discipline that studies spatial variations to understand the geographic landscape and the risk environment within which disease epidemics occur. GIS maps provide visualization aids to investigate the spatial distribution of disease outcomes, the associated social factors, and environmental exposures. Analytical inference, such as estimation of disease risks and identification of spatial disease clusters, can provide a detailed statistical view of spatial distributions of diseases. Spatial and spatiotemporal models can help us to understand, measure, and analyze disease syndemics as well as the social, biological, and structural factors associated with them in space and time.
In this paper, we present a background on syndemics and spatial epidemiological theory and practice. We then present a case study focused on the HIV and HCV syndemic in West Virginia to provide an example of the use of GIS and spatial analytical methods. The concepts described in this paper can be considered to enhance understanding and analysis of other syndemics for which space-time data are available.
A novel index to evaluate discretization methods: A case study of flood susceptibility assessment based on random forest
2021, Geoscience Frontiers
The selection of a suitable discretization method (DM) to discretize spatially continuous variables (SCVs) is critical in ML-based natural hazard susceptibility assessment. However, few studies start to consider the influence due to the selected DMs and how to efficiently select a suitable DM for each SCV. These issues were well addressed in this study. The information loss rate (ILR), an index based on the information entropy, seems can be used to select optimal DM for each SCV. However, the ILR fails to show the actual influence of discretization because such index only considers the total amount of information of the discretized variables departing from the original SCV. Facing this issue, we propose an index, information change rate (ICR), that focuses on the changed amount of information due to the discretization based on each cell, enabling the identification of the optimal DM. We develop a case study with Random Forest (training/testing ratio of 7 : 3) to assess flood susceptibility in Wanan County, China. The area under the curve-based and susceptibility maps-based approaches were presented to compare the ILR and ICR. The results show the ICR-based optimal DMs are more rational than the ILR-based ones in both cases. Moreover, we observed the ILR values are unnaturally small (<1%), whereas the ICR values are obviously more in line with general recognition (usually 10%–30%). The above results all demonstrate the superiority of the ICR. We consider this study fills up the existing research gaps, improving the ML-based natural hazard susceptibility assessments.
“We only have the one”: Mapping the prevalence of people with high body mass to aid regional emergency management planning in aotearoa New Zealand
2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Citation Excerpt :
Disaster planning requires a good understanding of the geographical dimensions, boundaries, lifelines and important facilities [64] with advances in health data it is also possible to include key human health geography. The promise of GIS mapping include the potential to reach a broad array of audiences, including health planners, policymakers, advocacy groups, and an interested public [65]. Although this movement promotes creative means of analysis and identification of at-risk populations for planners and researchers, such accessibility may pose dilemmas relating to labelling populations living in particular geographic locales [40–42].
People have been left behind in disasters directly associated with their size, shape, and weight and are disproportionately impacted in pandemics. Despite alignment with known vulnerabilities such as poverty, age, and disability, the literature is inaudible on body mass. Emergency managers report little or no information on body mass prevalence. This exploratory study aimed to illustrate population prevalence of high body mass for emergency planning.
Cross-sectional data from the New Zealand Health Survey were pooled for the years 2013/14–2017/18 (n = 68 053 adults aged ≥15 years). Height and weight were measured and used to calculate body mass index. The prevalence of high body mass were mapped to emergency management boundary shapefiles. The resulting maps were piloted with emergency managers.
Maps highlight the population prevalence of high body mass across emergency management regions, providing a visual tool. A pilot with 14 emergency managers assessed the utility of such mapping. On the basis of the visual information, the tool prompted 12 emergency managers to consider such groups in regional planning and to discuss needs.
Visual mapping is a useful tool to highlight population prevalence of groups likely to be at higher risk in disasters. This is believed to be the first study to map high body mass for the purposes of emergency planning. Future research is required to identify prevalence at a finer geographical scale. More features in the local context such as physical location features, risk and vulnerability features could also be included in future research.
Spatial distribution of agricultural pesticide use and predicted wetland exposure in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region
2020, Science of the Total Environment
Citation Excerpt :
The classes were optimized to illustrate the spatial distribution of each pesticide group based on their specific frequency distributions. For example, for fungicides we used quantile distribution since the distribution was left skewed, whereas k-means algorithm was used for insecticides and herbicides, to reduce the variability within classes and maximize the variance among classes (Brewer, 2006). The open source software R, version 3.5 (R Core Team, 2019) was used for mapping and the R package classInt (Bivand, 2018) for the classification.
Agricultural pest control products are a major cause of degradation of water quality and biodiversity loss worldwide. In the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region, the landscape is characterized by millions of ecologically important wetlands, but also large farm sizes and high agrochemical use. Despite the region’s agricultural intensity, the spatial extent of pesticide use and likelihood of pesticides contaminating surface water has been poorly studied. Here, we estimated the pesticide use patterns for three main groups (herbicides, fungicides and insecticides) using the most recent (2015) pesticide use survey data and digital crop maps. Furthermore, we developed a Wetland Pesticide Occurrence Index (WPOI; 1 km² resolution), to robustly estimate potential wetland exposure using spatially explicit data on pesticide use density, wetland density, precipitation and pesticide-specific physicochemical properties. In total, 39,236 metric tonnes of pesticides consisting of 94 active ingredients were applied to the Prairies in 2015. Herbicides had the highest density of use (24–183 kg/km²), followed by fungicides (0.4–23.8 kg/km²) and insecticides (0.4–3.6 kg/km²). Pesticide use differed by province; however, the major pesticides applied (e.g., glyphosate, prothioconazole, and thiamethoxam) were consistent across the region and were largely associated with wheat and canola crops. Although insecticides and fungicides had lower mass applied than herbicides, they had slightly higher overall WPOI scores. The predicted pesticide occurrence for insecticides and fungicides in wetlands was higher in the wetter central and eastern part of the Prairie region (WPOI = 0.6–1) compared to the drier western and southwestern part (WPOI = 0.1–0.6), suggesting that wetlands in much of Saskatchewan and southern Manitoba may be more vulnerable to higher and frequent contamination. Identifying crops, chemicals and landscapes with the greatest likelihood of pesticide contamination to wetlands will help prioritize future environmental monitoring programs and aid in assessing the ecological risk of specific pest control products in Canada’s most agriculturally intensive region.
The Volcanic Hazard Maps Database: an initiative of the IAVCEI Commission on Volcanic Hazards and Risk
2023, Journal of Applied Volcanology

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Review articleBasic Mapping Principles for Visualizing Cancer Data Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Abstract

Introduction

Section snippets

Mapping Methods

Mapping Multiple Variables

Map Finishing

Conclusion

Cancer mortality maps and graphs

Using geographic information systems technology in the collection, analysis, and presentation of cancer registry dataa handbook of basic practices

Thematic cartography and geographic visualization

Choosing geographic units for choropleth rate maps, with an emphasis on public health applications

Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci

ColorBrewer in printA catalog of color schemes for maps

Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci

ColorBrewer.organ online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps

Br Cartogr Soc

Mapping mortalityevaluating color schemes for choropleth maps

Ann Assoc Am Geogr

Spectral schemesControversial color use on maps

Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci

An evaluation of color selections to accommodate map users with color-vision impairments

Ann Assoc Am Geogr

Guidelines for selecting colors for diverging schemes on maps

Br Cartogr Soc

Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series

Ann Assoc Am Geogr

Reflections on mapping Census 2000

Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci

Maps and cartograms of the 2004 U.S. presidential election results

Review article
Basic Mapping Principles for Visualizing Cancer Data Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)