The clinical heterogeneity of preeclampsia is related to both placental gene expression and placental histopathology

Background

Preeclampsia is a life-threatening disorder of pregnancy, demonstrating a high degree of heterogeneity in clinical features such as presentation, disease severity, and outcomes. This heterogeneity suggests distinct pathophysiological mechanisms may be driving the placental disease underlying this disorder. Our group recently reported distinct clusters of placental gene expression in preeclampsia and control pregnancies, allowing for the identification of at least 3 clinically relevant gene expression-based subtypes of preeclampsia. Histopathological examination of a small number of samples from 2 of the gene expression–based subtypes revealed placental lesions consistent with their gene expression phenotype, suggesting that detailed placental histopathology may provide further insight into the pathophysiology underlying these distinct gene expression-based subtypes.

Objectives

The objective of the study was to assess histopathological lesions in the placentas of patients belonging to each identified gene expression–based subtype of preeclampsia, characterized in our previous study. Our goal was to further understand the pathophysiologies defining these gene expression–based subtypes by integrating gene expression with histopathological findings, possibly identifying additional subgroups of preeclampsia patients.

Study Design

Paraffin-embedded placental biopsies from patients included in the gene expression profiling study (n = 142 of 157, 90.4%) were sectioned, hematoxylin and eosin stained, and imaged. An experienced perinatal pathologist, blinded to gene expression findings and clinical information, assessed the presence and severity of histological lesions using a comprehensive, standardized data collection form. The frequency and severity scores of observed histopathological lesions were compared among gene expression–based subtypes as well as within each subtype using using Fisher exact tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and hierarchical clustering. The histological findings of the placental samples were visualized using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding and phylogenetic trees. Concordance and discordance between gene expression findings and histopathology were also investigated and visualized using principal component analysis.

Results

Several histological lesions were found to be characteristic of each gene expression–based preeclampsia subtype. The overall concordance between gene expression and histopathology for all samples was 65% (93 of 142), with characteristic placental lesions for each gene expression–based subtype complementing prior gene enrichment findings (ie, placentas with enrichment of hypoxia-associated genes showed severe lesions of maternal vascular malperfusion). Concordant samples were located in the central area of each gene expression–based cluster when viewed on a principal component analysis plot. Interestingly, discordant samples (gene expression and histopathology not reflective of one another) were generally found to lie at the periphery of the gene expression–based clusters and tended to border the group of patients with phenotypically similar histopathology.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrates a high degree of concordance between placental lesions and gene expression across subtypes of preeclampsia. Additionally, novel integrative analysis of scored placental histopathology severity and gene expression findings allowed for the identification of patients with intermediate phenotypes of preeclampsia not apparent through gene expression profiling alone. Future investigations should examine the temporal relationship between these 2 modalities as well as consider the maternal and fetal contributions to these subtypes of disease.