Major article
Selecting models for a respiratory protection program: What can we learn from the scientific literature?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.021Get rights and content

Background

An unbiased source of comparable respirator performance data would be helpful in setting up a hospital respiratory protection program.

Methods

The scientific literature was examined to assess the extent to which performance data (respirator fit, comfort and usability) from N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) models are available to assist with FFR model selection and procurement decisions.

Results

Ten studies were identified that met the search criteria for fit, whereas 5 studies met the criteria for comfort and usability.

Conclusion

Analysis of these studies indicated that it is difficult to directly use the scientific literature to inform the FFR selection process because of differences in study populations, methodologies, and other factors. Although there does not appear to be a single best fitting FFR, studies demonstrate that fit testing programs can be designed to successfully fit nearly all workers with existing products. Comfort and usability are difficult to quantify. Among the studies found, no significant differences were noted.

Section snippets

Assessment of fit test methods

FFRs must fit properly to provide maximum protection. Mandatory procedures for assuring proper fit can be found in the OSHA Respiratory Protection standard 29 CFR 1910.134.1 The methods applicable to the N95 FFRs include qualitative fit tests using either saccharin or denatonium benzoate (Macfarlan Smith Ltd, Edinburgh, U.K.) aerosols. Adequate fit is indicated if the test subject does not detect the sweet or bitter taste of saccharin or Bitrex, respectively, while performing a series of 7

Results

Over 100 full-text articles were found using the search terms and Web sites selected. One of the authors reviewed the articles and assessed each for eligibility. No articles meeting the eligibility requirements were excluded.

Discussion

Among the performance characteristics considered in the study, only fit testing can be measured using mature and standard test methods that permit trend analysis. Fit testing is a necessary component of a respiratory protection program. Unlike fit, comfort and usability assessment are not specific respirator program requirements, and the development of standardized test methods is still emerging. However, poor comfort and usability have been identified as causes of poor compliance.2, 8, 9, 27,

Conclusions

The primary conclusion is that it is difficult to use the scientific literature directly to inform the respirator selection process. Differences in methodology, study populations, skill level of the fit tester, and inherent errors in fit testing contribute to the variation seen when looking for trends in fit test pass rates across studies. Although there does not appear to be a single best fitting FFR, several studies demonstrate that fit testing programs can be designed to successfully fit

References (40)

  • M. Figueroa

    Respiratory protection programs and healthcare professionals: compliance, knowledge and perceptions

    (2013)
  • K. Lee et al.

    Respiratory protection against mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators

    J Occup Environ Hyg

    (2004)

  • Safety and health program management guidelines; issuance of voluntary guidelines

    Fed Regist

    (1989)
  • L. Janssen et al.

    The use of respirators to reduce inhalation of airborne biological agents

    J Occup Environ Hyg

    (2013)
  • L.J. Radonovich et al.

    Respirator tolerance in health care workers

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • D.J. Lofgren

    A must for NIOSH: certify fit performance of the half mask particulate respirator

    J Occup Environ Hyg

    (2012)
  • J.L. Marsh

    Evaluation of saccharin qualitative fitting test for respirators

    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J

    (1984)
  • H.E. Mullins et al.

    Development of a new qualitative test for fit testing respirators

    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J

    (1995)
  • R.B. da Roza

    Evaluation of Portacount for determining respirator fit factors, Part III: human subject tests and comparison with an aerosol photometer

    J Int Soc Respir Prot Prot

    (1991)
  • C.C. Coffey et al.

    Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators

    J Occup Environ Hyg

    (2004)

    • Cited by (0)

    Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions of this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Mention of a commercial product or trade name does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

    Funding/support: This work was conducted using National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health intramural research funds.

    Conflicts of interest: None to report.

    View full text
    Published by Mosby, Inc.