Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 209, March 2019, Pages 63-67
American Heart Journal

Clinical Investigation
Comparison of the change in heart failure readmission and mortality rates between hospitals subject to hospital readmission reduction program penalties and critical access hospitals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.002Get rights and content

Background

The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), announced in 2010, penalizes hospitals with high readmissions for multiple conditions including heart failure.

Methods

We compared heart failure readmission and mortality rates in hospitals exposed to HRRP financial penalties with critical access hospitals (CAHs) not subject to the penalty between 2005 and 2016 using 3-year moving averages from Hospital Compare.

Results

After HRRP introduction, CAHs experienced a 0.60% annual decrease (95% CI: −0.61 to −0.59%) in heart failure readmissions. HRRP-exposed hospitals experienced an additional 0.13% annual decrease (95% CI: −0.14 to −0.12%) compared with CAHs. The association between HRRP penalties and mortality varied with model specifications.

Conclusions

Using CAHs as a control group, we found the introduction of financial penalties was only associated with modest reductions in readmissions and an uncertain association with mortality. Cluster-randomized rollouts of health care policy interventions will allow us to better evaluate the impact of our interventions.

Section snippets

Methods

Hospital-level, risk-adjusted 30-day readmission and mortality rates after hospitalizations for heart failure were extracted from the Hospital Compare website (publicly available Medicare database).6 We used annually updated, 3-year moving averages between 2005 and 2015. Since cohorts include data over 3-year periods, several cohorts overlapped with the launch of HRRP. The program was announced in 2010 with penalties starting in October 2012. We assumed outcomes from 2005 to 2008 through 2007

Results

Complete data were available for 448 of 1010 (44.4%) CAHs certified since before 2005 and 2746 HEHs (66.8% of those on Hospital Compare). In the first period (2005–2008), 30-day heart failure readmission rates were significantly higher in HEHs than CAHs (24.5% vs 24.3%, P = .01) while 30-day mortality rates were significantly lower (11.1% vs 11.7%, P < .01).

Discussion

Readmission rates decreased after HRRP introduction both for hospitals subjected to financial penalties and those that were not. The difference in post-HRRP readmission rates between CAHs and HEHs was small compared with the decrease in CAHs. This suggests direct exposure to financial penalties was not solely responsible for the observed decrease in readmissions. In hospitals exposed to penalties, we found an initial increase in mortality after HRRP along with a smaller decrease in the annual

References (11)

  • C.K. McIlvennan et al.

    Hospital readmissions reduction program

    Circulation

    (2015)
  • A. Gupta et al.

    Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Implementation With Readmission and Mortality Outcomes in Heart Failure

    JAMA Cardiol

    (2018)
  • P. Chatterjee et al.

    US national trends in mortality from acute myocardial infarction and heart failure: policy success or failure?

    JAMA Cardiol

    (2018)
  • Medpac

    Critical Access Hospitals Payment System

  • Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services

    Critical Access Hospital

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text