Association between income and education with quit attempts, use of cessation aids, and short-term success in tobacco smokers: A social gradient analysis from a population-based cross-sectional household survey in Germany (DEBRA study)

Highlights

• In Germany – without free cessation therapy – low- vs. high-income smokers have:

• Higher odds of attempting to quit but lower odds of using cessation medication.

• Reduced therapy affordability may cause the social gradient in absolute quit rates.

• This will increase tobacco-related health disparities between different SES groups.

Abstract

Introduction

Smoking is more prevalent in smokers from lower compared with higher socioeconomic (SES) groups, but studies are inconsistent regarding underlying mechanisms. We aimed to assess associations between SES indicators and three distinct aspects of the smoking cessation process: attempting to quit; use of evidence-based cessation treatments; and success.

Methods

We analysed data of 12,161 last-year smokers (i.e., current smokers and recent ex-smokers who quit ≤ 12 months) from 20 waves (June/July 2016 to August/September 2019) of the German Study on Tobacco Use (DEBRA) – a representative household survey. Associations between indicators of SES (income and education) and (1) last-year quit attempts; (2) use of evidence-based cessation treatment or electronic cigarettes during the last attempt; and (3) short-term self-reported abstinence were analysed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders.

Results

Of all last-years smokers, 18.6% had attempted to quit, of whom 15.2% had successfully stopped. Higher income (OR 0.82, 95%CI = 0.77–0.88 per 1000€) but low vs. high education (OR 0.83, 95%CI = 0.73–0.95) were associated with lower odds of quit attempts. In smokers with quit attempts, higher income but not education was associated with higher odds of using cessation medication (OR 1.31, 95%CI = 1.08–1.59 per 1000 €). Neither income nor education were associated with using behavioural support or success.

Conclusions

In the German healthcare system without free access to evidence-based cessation therapy, low-income smokers are more likely to make a quit attempt but less likely to use cessation medication than high-income smokers. Equitable access to such medication is crucial to reduce SES-related health disparities.

Introduction

Tobacco smoking is the largest single and avoidable risk factor for a huge number of diseases (World Health Organization, 2017). In Germany, one third of the population smokes tobacco, which leads to approximately 125,000 deaths each year (Kotz and Kastaun, 2018, Mons and Brenner, 2017). Like many countries (Cancer Research UK, 2018, Leventhal et al., 2019, Mackenbach et al., 2008, Tabuchi and Kondo, 2017, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014), prevalence remains considerably higher among smokers from more disadvantaged socioeconomic status (SES) groups with lower educational levels and/or lower income (Kotz et al., 2018, Kuntz et al., 2016), leading to substantial health disparities and differences in life expectancy (Gregoraci et al., 2017, Mackenbach et al., 2008).

Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in smoking is a key factor to reduce health inequalities. Implementation of tobacco control strategies (Feliu et al., 2019), including access to smoking cessation treatment (Hartmann-Boyce et al., 2018, Kotz et al., 2014a), can help to decrease smoking prevalence rates. There is some concern that higher SES groups benefit more from the provision of stop smoking support (Brown et al., 2014, Hill et al., 2014). However, the latest evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) suggests that the provision of equity-oriented support can achieve a range of equity-positive outcomes in disadvantaged groups (Smith, Hill, & Amos, 2020). For the further refinement and implementation of equitable tobacco control strategies and support, the causes of higher smoking prevalence in disadvantaged groups need to be understood.

It is known that people from more deprived SES groups are more likely to take up smoking, due to different living conditions with a higher availability of tobacco products, and greater exposure to stress (Hiscock, Bauld, Amos, Fidler, & Munafo, 2012), but these smokers are also less likely to quit (Hiscock et al., 2012, Kuntz et al., 2016, Lampert and Thamm, 2004, Leventhal et al., 2019).

Successful smoking cessation is a function of two processes: attempting to quit and succeeding in staying abstinent. Both processes might be separately influenced by socioeconomic factors (Hiscock et al., 2012). Hence, it is important to distinguish whether smokers from different SES groups differ regarding the incidence of quit attempts and/or the success of such attempts (Kotz & West, 2009), which is closely correlated with the use of evidence-based cessation methods (Hartmann-Boyce et al., 2018, Kotz et al., 2014a). Evidence for the former remains inconsistent (Reid, Hammond, Boudreau, et al., 2010). Studies from the United States (US) have reported a lower rate of quit attempts among smokers with lower education (Levy et al., 2005, Reid et al., 2010). In contrast, other studies from the US, UK, and Canada, did not report a social gradient (Hackshaw et al., 2010, Hyland et al., 2006, Reid et al., 2010).

It seems reasonable that the health system context and varying tobacco control policy environments over time contribute to this inconsistency (Reid, Hammond, Boudreau, et al., 2010). While cessation treatment was not reimbursed in the US, lower educated smokers appeared less likely than higher educated smokers to support their quit attempt with evidence-based cessation aids (Shiffman, Brockwell, Pillitteri, & Gitchell, 2008). Cross-sectional data from the Smoking Toolkit Study (STS) in England, where such treatment is freely available, showed in contrast that low SES-smokers were just as likely as high-SES smokers to try to quit and to use evidence-based cessation aids. However, a strong social gradient was found for cessation success, with disadvantaged groups being half as likely to succeed compared with the highest SES group (Kotz & West, 2009). Stronger dependence and lower levels of self-efficacy in low-SES smokers may explain these findings (Kotz & West, 2009). Seo, Paek, Jo, and Choi (2019) recently reported prospective data from Korean smokers who participated in a cessation program and showed that lower income, higher dependence, and choice of bupropion versus varenicline were associated with lower cessation success. The association with dependence was found only in low-income smokers.

Drawing on a sample of 12,161 last-year tobacco smokers (i.e., current smokers and recent ex-smokers who quit during the past year) representative of the German population, the present study aims at assessing associations between two different indicators of SES (income and education) and three distinct processes of smoking cessation: 1) self-reported attempts to quit smoking during the past year, 2) the use of evidence-based smoking cessation aids and electronic cigarettes (ECs), and 3) short-term “success” rates in quitting among those who attempted to quit, adjusted for potential confounders including the level of tobacco dependence. We planned to analyse income and education separately, since both factors may differently influence the process of smoking cessation, and no universally valid composite index of social status exist in Germany.