Association between income and education with quit attempts, use of cessation aids, and short-term success in tobacco smokers: A social gradient analysis from a population-based cross-sectional household survey in Germany (DEBRA study)
Introduction
Tobacco smoking is the largest single and avoidable risk factor for a huge number of diseases (World Health Organization, 2017). In Germany, one third of the population smokes tobacco, which leads to approximately 125,000 deaths each year (Kotz and Kastaun, 2018, Mons and Brenner, 2017). Like many countries (Cancer Research UK, 2018, Leventhal et al., 2019, Mackenbach et al., 2008, Tabuchi and Kondo, 2017, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014), prevalence remains considerably higher among smokers from more disadvantaged socioeconomic status (SES) groups with lower educational levels and/or lower income (Kotz et al., 2018, Kuntz et al., 2016), leading to substantial health disparities and differences in life expectancy (Gregoraci et al., 2017, Mackenbach et al., 2008).
Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in smoking is a key factor to reduce health inequalities. Implementation of tobacco control strategies (Feliu et al., 2019), including access to smoking cessation treatment (Hartmann-Boyce et al., 2018, Kotz et al., 2014a), can help to decrease smoking prevalence rates. There is some concern that higher SES groups benefit more from the provision of stop smoking support (Brown et al., 2014, Hill et al., 2014). However, the latest evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) suggests that the provision of equity-oriented support can achieve a range of equity-positive outcomes in disadvantaged groups (Smith, Hill, & Amos, 2020). For the further refinement and implementation of equitable tobacco control strategies and support, the causes of higher smoking prevalence in disadvantaged groups need to be understood.
It is known that people from more deprived SES groups are more likely to take up smoking, due to different living conditions with a higher availability of tobacco products, and greater exposure to stress (Hiscock, Bauld, Amos, Fidler, & Munafo, 2012), but these smokers are also less likely to quit (Hiscock et al., 2012, Kuntz et al., 2016, Lampert and Thamm, 2004, Leventhal et al., 2019).
Successful smoking cessation is a function of two processes: attempting to quit and succeeding in staying abstinent. Both processes might be separately influenced by socioeconomic factors (Hiscock et al., 2012). Hence, it is important to distinguish whether smokers from different SES groups differ regarding the incidence of quit attempts and/or the success of such attempts (Kotz & West, 2009), which is closely correlated with the use of evidence-based cessation methods (Hartmann-Boyce et al., 2018, Kotz et al., 2014a). Evidence for the former remains inconsistent (Reid, Hammond, Boudreau, et al., 2010). Studies from the United States (US) have reported a lower rate of quit attempts among smokers with lower education (Levy et al., 2005, Reid et al., 2010). In contrast, other studies from the US, UK, and Canada, did not report a social gradient (Hackshaw et al., 2010, Hyland et al., 2006, Reid et al., 2010).
It seems reasonable that the health system context and varying tobacco control policy environments over time contribute to this inconsistency (Reid, Hammond, Boudreau, et al., 2010). While cessation treatment was not reimbursed in the US, lower educated smokers appeared less likely than higher educated smokers to support their quit attempt with evidence-based cessation aids (Shiffman, Brockwell, Pillitteri, & Gitchell, 2008). Cross-sectional data from the Smoking Toolkit Study (STS) in England, where such treatment is freely available, showed in contrast that low SES-smokers were just as likely as high-SES smokers to try to quit and to use evidence-based cessation aids. However, a strong social gradient was found for cessation success, with disadvantaged groups being half as likely to succeed compared with the highest SES group (Kotz & West, 2009). Stronger dependence and lower levels of self-efficacy in low-SES smokers may explain these findings (Kotz & West, 2009). Seo, Paek, Jo, and Choi (2019) recently reported prospective data from Korean smokers who participated in a cessation program and showed that lower income, higher dependence, and choice of bupropion versus varenicline were associated with lower cessation success. The association with dependence was found only in low-income smokers.
Drawing on a sample of 12,161 last-year tobacco smokers (i.e., current smokers and recent ex-smokers who quit during the past year) representative of the German population, the present study aims at assessing associations between two different indicators of SES (income and education) and three distinct processes of smoking cessation: 1) self-reported attempts to quit smoking during the past year, 2) the use of evidence-based smoking cessation aids and electronic cigarettes (ECs), and 3) short-term “success” rates in quitting among those who attempted to quit, adjusted for potential confounders including the level of tobacco dependence. We planned to analyse income and education separately, since both factors may differently influence the process of smoking cessation, and no universally valid composite index of social status exist in Germany.
Section snippets
Design, setting, and participants
The DEBRA study (www.debra-study.info) is a nationwide, cross-sectional, computer-assisted, face-to-face household survey of the German population aged 14 years and over (Kastaun et al., 2017). Every other month, a new, sample of approximately 2000 persons is interviewed as part of a multi-topic omnibus survey, which is conducted by a commissioned market research institute. Respondents are selected through multi-stage, multi-stratified random probability sampling, and all respondents are
Sample characteristics
The unweighted total sample of last-year smokers (N = 12,161) had a mean age of 46.6 years (standard deviation (SD) = 17 years) and 46.9% (N = 5,698) were female. Demographic and smoking characteristics among the total sample of last-year smokers, stratified by educational level and net household income, are presented in Table 1. Of all last-years smokers, 18.6%w (Nw = 2258; 18.4%, N = 2238) had tried to quit during the last year. Of those who attempted to quit, 15.2%w (Nw = 344; 14.6%,
Discussion
In a large national survey of the German population, lower education but higher income were associated with a lower likelihood of attempting to quit, after adjustment for important confounders including tobacco dependence. Smokers with higher incomes had greater odds of using evidence-based cessation methods, particularly pharmacological support, but there were no significant associations with education. Neither income nor education were significantly related to short-term success of quit
Funding source
The DEBRA study was supported by the Ministry for Culture and Science of the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia (“NRW-Rückkehrprogramm”) and the German Federal Ministry of Health who had no involvement in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in the writing of the manuscript.
Author contributions
SK coordinates the DEBRA study, drafted the manuscript, analysed and interpreted the data. JB co-wrote the manuscript and interpreted the data. DK conceived the DEBRA study, contributed to the study design, co-wrote the manuscript, and supervised the analyses. All named authors contributed substantially to the manuscript and agreed on its final version.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Sabrina Kastaun: Writing - original draft, Conceptualization, Project administration, Data curation, Methodology, Formal analysis. Jamie Brown: Writing - review & editing, Conceptualization. Daniel Kotz: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition, Methodology.
Declaration of Competing Interest
SK and DK have no conflict of interest to declare. JB received unrestricted research funding from Pfizer, who manufacture smoking cessation medications. All authors declare no financial links with tobacco companies or e-cigarette manufacturers or their representatives.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank: Professor Robert West for his intellectual support with the applied analyses and with the DEBRA study design; and Kantar Health (Constanze Cholmakow-Bodechtel and Linda Scharf) for data collection.
References (47)
- et al.
Financial Strain, Quit Attempts, and Smoking Abstinence Among U.S. Adult Smokers
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
(2018) - et al.
Prospective cohort study of the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments used in the “real world”
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
(2014) - et al.
Individual differences in adoption of treatment for smoking cessation: Demographic and smoking history characteristics
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2008) - et al.
Educational inequalities in smoking among Japanese adults aged 25–94 years: Nationally representative sex- and age-specific statistics
International Journal of Epidemiology
(2017) - et al.
Dependence and motivation to stop smoking as predictors of success of a quit attempt among smokers seeking help to quit
Addictive Behaviors
(2016) - Batra, A., & Mann, K. (2015). S3 Guideline “Screening, Diagnostics, and Treatment of Harmful and Addictive Tobacco Use”...
- et al.
Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: A cross-sectional population study
Addiction
(2014) - et al.
Equity impact of European individual-level smoking cessation interventions to reduce smoking in adults: A systematic review
European Journal of Public Health
(2014) - Cancer Research UK. (2018). Stop smoking inequalities. A systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in experiences...
- et al.
Impact of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and quit ratios in 27 European Union countries from 2006 to 2014
Tobacco Control
(2019)
Strength of urges to smoke as a measure of severity of cigarette dependence: Comparison with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence and its components
Addiction
A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 Update – A US public health service report
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Categorisation of continuous exposure variables revisited. A response to the hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) Study
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Middle incomes in Germany and the US
DIW Economic Bulletin
Contribution of smoking to socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: A study of 14 European countries, 1990–2004
Tobacco Control
Quit attempts in response to smoke-free legislation in England
Tobacco Control
A randomized trial of E-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy
New England Journal of Medicine
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
Cochrane Database Systematic Review
Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation
Cochrane Database Systematic Review
Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: Review of the evidence
Tobacco Control
Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Cited by (7)
Cue Reactivity Effects of Heated Tobacco Product Use in Current, Former, and Never Smokers in the United States
2023, Nicotine and Tobacco ResearchPrevalence and predictors of tobacco use in older adults: a case in Turkey
2023, Journal of Substance Use