Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 38, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 1435-1441
Addictive Behaviors

Adolescents' fMRI activation to a response inhibition task predicts future substance use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Deficient behavioral regulation may be a risk factor for substance use disorders in adolescents. Abnormalities in brain regions critical to cognitive control have been linked to more intense and problematic future substance use (e.g., Durazzo, Gazdzinski, Mon, & Meyerhoff, 2010; Falk, Berkman, Whalen, & Lieberman, 2011; Paulus, Tapert, & Schuckit, 2005). The goal of this study was to examine the degree to which brain response to an inhibition task measured in mid-adolescence can predict substance use 18 months later.

Method

Adolescents aged 16–19 (N = 80) performed a go/no-go response inhibition task during fMRI at project baseline, and were followed 18 months later with a detailed interview on substance use and dependence symptoms. Participants were 39 high frequency users and 41 demographically similar low frequency users (458 versus 2 average lifetime drug use occasions at baseline, respectively).

Results

Across all subjects, no-go trials produced significant increases in neural response in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and a region including the left angular and supramarginal gyri (p(FWE) < .01, cluster threshold ≥ 30 voxels). Less ventromedial prefrontal activation but more left angular gyrus activation predicted higher levels of substance use and dependence symptoms in the following 18 months, particularly for those who were high frequency users in mid-adolescence (p < .05).

Conclusions

These findings are consistent with studies showing that impairments in cognitive control have strong associations with substance use. We found a predictive relationship between atypical activation patterns at baseline and substance use behavior 18 months later, particularly among adolescents with histories of previous heavy use.

Highlights

► We examined whether fMRI activation could predict subsequent substance use behavior. ► Participants were adolescents with varying histories of substance use. ► Atypical activation during response inhibition predicted more drug and alcohol problems. ► Predictive relationship was strongest for youth with heavy histories of substance use.

Introduction

Experimentation with drugs and alcohol is quite common during adolescence. Spanning the years from 8th grade to 12th grade, the proportion of youth reporting recent use of an illicit drug increases from 10% to 24% (Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2010). Prevalence of recent drinking to intoxication similarly rises from 5% to 27% across the same time frame (Johnston et al., 2010). Among young adults ages 18–25, over 15% meet criteria for alcohol or drug abuse or dependence (Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (SAMHSA), 2010). Given the detrimental functional and social consequences of substance use disorders, identifying which youth are particularly susceptible to dependence is of great clinical significance. Research that isolates predictors of future substance use problems can refine the etiology of addictive behaviors and point to potential targets and strategies for early intervention.

A number of studies have used longitudinal and cross-sectional methods to identify risk factors for developing substance use disorders in mid to late adolescence. Psychiatric disorders (e.g., conduct disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder) (Boyle et al., 1992, Elkins et al., 2007), personality factors (e.g., novelty seeking, harm avoidance) (Mâsse & Tremblay, 1997), genetic characteristics (e.g., hypodopaminergic genotypes) (Conner, Hellemann, Ritchie, & Noble, 2010), and cognitive ability (e.g., executive functioning) (Nigg et al., 2006, Tarter et al., 2003) have all been implicated as predictors for alcohol and illicit drug use in adolescence. However, research focusing on brain-behavior relationships to elucidate the neurocognitive correlates of substance use risk is limited.

Recently, some researchers have used neuroimaging (Durazzo, Gazdzinski, Mon, & Meyerhoff, 2010), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in particular, to help clarify the neural precursors of future substance-related behavior in adults. For example, Falk, Berkman, Whalen, and Lieberman (2011) found that medial prefrontal blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response during exposure to videos on smoking abstinence predicted subsequent reduction in cigarette use. Among cocaine users, greater fMRI response to a Stroop task in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) predicted longer durations of abstinence (Brewer, Worhunsky, Carroll, Rounsaville, & Potenza, 2008) and, during a drug cue reactivity task, correlated with post-treatment cocaine urine toxicology (Kosten et al., 2006). Dampened neural response in right middle frontal regions during a decision-making task administered to methamphetamine users who were undergoing drug treatment predicted a higher probability of post-treatment relapse (Paulus, Tapert, & Schuckit, 2005).

Response inhibition, which is an executive functioning faculty of cognitive control, has shown strong associations with substance use disorders (Hester and Garavan, 2004, Lawrence et al., 2009, Verdejo-García et al., 2006). In addition, increasing evidence suggests that poor performance on measures of response inhibition and impulsivity indicate a vulnerability to substance use initiation and escalation (for a review, see (Verdejo-García, Lawrence, & Clark, 2008)). We recently examined differential BOLD responses to a go/no-go task in substance-naïve adolescents (ages 12-14); comparing 21 youth who initiated substance use in the subsequent three years to 17 youth who remained non to minimal users throughout adolescence (Norman et al., 2011). Those who went on to use substances had shown significantly less activation at baseline in 12 brain regions including and extending beyond typically observed inhibitory circuitry (Aron, 2007), particularly prefrontal regions.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether certain characteristics of brain activation during response inhibition could predict future substance use in adolescents with a range of baseline use patterns. We employed a go/no-go task administered during fMRI to high and low frequency users, then longitudinally assessed the adolescents' alcohol and drug use for the subsequent 18 months. Given the importance of executive cognitive control in identifying vulnerability to substance use, we hypothesized that less prefrontal cortex activation during an inhibition task would predict more substance use and problems above and beyond substance use history up until the time of the imaging session.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were 39 adolescents with a history of high frequency substance use (HF group) and 41 demographically matched peers with low frequency substance use histories (LF group). Both groups were recruited from the same public schools in the San Diego metropolitan area (Bava et al., 2009a, Bava et al., 2009b, Medina et al., 2007, Schweinsburg et al., 2008, Tapert et al., 2007). In accordance with the University of California San Diego Human Research Protections Program, informed consent and

Results

Behavioral performance on the go/no-go task as measured by hits (correct go responses), misses (failures to respond), false alarms (failures to inhibit), and a discriminability index (Green & Swets, 1966) did not significantly differ between LF and HF users (ps  .43).

For all participants on average (N = 80), no-go trials relative to go trials showed significant positive BOLD response contrast (p(FWE) < .01, cluster threshold ≥ 30 voxels) in: (1) a cluster centered on the vmPFC (680 voxels) that

Discussion

Findings indicated that fMRI activation during a response inhibition task predicted variability in future alcohol and drug use above and beyond variability predicted by past substance use history. This predictive relationship between neural activity in mid-adolescence and substance use behavior in the subsequent 18 months was accounted for by the adolescents with histories of frequent substance use (the HF group) at the time of the imaging. Overall, these results indicated that the utilization

Role of funding sources

This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA021182, PI: Tapert; P20 DA024194, PI: Mason; P20 DA027834, PI: Paulus) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (5 T32 AA1352505, PI: Riley). NIDA and NIAAA had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

Authors Mahmood and Tapert designed the study and wrote the protocol. Authors Goldenberg and Migliorini conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies. Authors Thayer and Simmons conducted statistical analysis and summarized results. Author Mahmood wrote the first draft of the manuscript with specific areas of input from Author Goldenberg. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Portions of these findings were presented at the 2010 Research Society on Alcoholism (RSA) Annual Meeting and the 2011 Winter Conference on Brain Research.

The authors would like thank Dr. MJ Meloy and Mr. Anthony Scarlett for their expertise and research assistance; and the research participants and families who helped make this study possible.

References (43)

  • N.J. van Harskamp et al.

    Are multiplication facts implemented by the left supramarginal and angular gyri?

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • A. Verdejo-García et al.

    Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2008)
  • A.R. Aron

    The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control

    The Neuroscientist

    (2007)
  • P.A. Bandettini et al.

    Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

    (1993)
  • S. Bava et al.

    Neurocognitive correlates of white matter quality in adolescent substance users

    Brain and Cognition

    (2009)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Manual for Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

    (1996)
  • M.H. Boyle et al.

    Predicting substance use in late adolescence: results from the Ontario Child Health Study follow-up

    The American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • S.A. Brown et al.

    Psychometric evaluation of the customary drinking and drug use record (CDDR): a measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

    (1998)
  • R.W. Cox et al.

    Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

    (1999)
  • I.J. Elkins et al.

    Prospective effects of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, and sex on adolescent substance use and abuse

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • K.O. Fagerström et al.

    Nicotine addiction and its assessment

    Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.

    2

    Present address: University of Colorado at Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boulder, CO.

    View full text