Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception

Abstract

A phone survey of 504 teen (age 16–20) and 409 adult (age 25–45) drivers in the US state of Alabama was conducted to examine the relationships among risk perception, positive affect and risky driving. Male drivers reported engaging in risky driving behaviors more frequently than female drivers and teen drivers reported engaging in risky driving behaviors more frequently than adult drivers. Positive affect (liking for risky driving behaviors) and perceived risk mediated the relationships of age and gender with risky driving. Affect and risk perception were independent predictors of risky driving behavior. Interactions of positive affect and perceived risk with gender and age showed that positive affect more strongly predicted risky driving for teen and male drivers than for adult and female drivers. These findings are interpreted in the context of dual process models of behavioral decision making. Future research into interventions designed to moderate the positive affect surrounding driving may have promise for reducing risky driving behavior.

Introduction

Motor vehicle crashes are a significant threat to young drivers worldwide (Peden et al., 2004). In the United States, vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for individuals 15–20 years old (NHTSA, 2009). Teen drivers were involved in nearly 12% of all fatal crashes in 2008, although teen drivers represent less than 7% of licensed drivers (NHTSA, 2009; licensed driver percent based on 2007 data, the latest data available; NHTSA, 2008). In spite of decreases in fatalities for young drivers since 1995 (Ferguson et al., 2007, NHTSA, 2009), further efforts to understand and reduce risky driving are warranted.

Although the extent to which teen crashes are attributable to inexperience or risk-taking has been debated (McKnight and McKnight, 2003, Senserrick, 2006), clearly teen crashes are characterized by features consistent with risk-taking behavior, such as speeding, following too closely, and driving too fast for conditions (Preusser et al., 1998, Reason et al., 1990, Rhodes et al., 2005). Several cognitive processes have been linked to risky driving behavior in young drivers (Teese and Bradley, 2008), including underestimating the extent to which they are at risk of serious consequences while driving (Delhomme et al., 2009, Matthews and Moran, 1986, Taubman-Ben Ari et al., 2004; but see Steinberg, 2008 for an alternate view) and overestimating their driving skill and their ability to recognize hazards (Harré et al., 2005, Horswill et al., 2004).

Gender differences have also been found in risky driving behavior (Harré et al., 2000, Harré et al., 1996, Oltedal and Rundmo, 2006). The fatality rate for male drivers is more than triple that for female drivers (NHTSA, 2009). Male drivers appear to take more risks than females, especially during adolescence (Vavrik, 1997). Male drivers in fatal crashes are more likely to have been speeding than female drivers in fatal crashes (NHTSA, 2007), have been found to drive significantly faster in towns, report more intention to drink and drive, and report engaging in other unsafe behaviors more often than female drivers of the same age (Harré et al., 1996).

Because of these observed patterns of risky driving for male as compared with female drivers, and for teen as compared with adult drivers, the purpose of the present research is to examine the cognitive and affective mediators of decision making in the context of driving risk. A more complete understanding of how drivers who are prone to risky behavior think and feel about driving should help to provide insights for behavior change.

Theoretical models that have been commonly applied to decision making about health risk behavior, such as the health belief model (Rosenstock, 1974) and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991, Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980), assume that decision making about risk behaviors occurs through rational processes such as evaluating the risks and benefits of a given action. If decision making was purely a rational process, interventions which inform drivers of the risks inherent in driving, such as driver's education, should be sufficient to encourage safer driving. In fact, research has failed to find a significant improvement in crash rates as a function of traditional driver's education programs (Hirsch, 2003, Mayhew, 2007, Mayhew and Simpson, 2002, Senserrick et al., 2009). Thus, it is important to move beyond models of rational decision making in understanding driving risk.

Recent work in behavioral decision making has focused on the implications of dual-process models of decision making (e.g., Chaiken and Trope, 1999, Smith and DeCoster, 2000). Dual-process models posit two systems of information processing. One system is rational, deliberative, and analytic and represents decisions that are based on logical analysis of the available information. In contrast, the other system is experiential and intuitive, and represents decision making based on affect. The emotional reactions to events and stimuli that form the basis for decisions have been the focus of research on experiential models of decision making (e.g., Damasio, 1994, Epstein, 1994, Finucane et al., 2000, Zajonc, 1980). Dual process models have been applied to health risk behaviors such as alcohol consumption (Moss and Albery, 2009) and cigarette smoking (Slovic, 2001), but have not been used extensively in the area of traffic safety. Yet, because affective modes of decision making are often relied on when there is significant time pressure to make a decision (Slovic and Peters, 2006, Smith and DeCoster, 2000), a focus on affect in risky driving seems particularly warranted, given that driving decisions are often made in response to rapidly changing situations and stimuli.

The driving of an automobile is an intensely emotional construct in contemporary American society. Driving is characterized by positive emotions associated with the pleasures of driving (Sheller, 2004). These positive emotions have been enhanced by emotional marketing of automobiles that emphasizes vehicle performance and the fun of driving (Britt, 2003, Ferguson et al., 2003), and by media portrayals of risky driving (Roberts, 1989). Recent research has shown that positive emotional functions of driving such as blowing off steam and having fun with friends are related to risky driving (Møller and Gregersen, 2008). Yet many of the investigations of dual process models have focused on negative affect, especially fear and anxiety (see review by Loewenstein et al., 2001). Because of the extent to which driving is positively valenced in our society, a focus on the role of positive affect may contribute to a fuller understanding of risky driving behavior.

When considered in light of research showing that, compared with adults, adolescent drivers often perceive driving behaviors to be less risky (Harré et al., 2000) dual process explanations may shed light on adolescents’ proclivity for engaging in more risky driving than older drivers. Indeed, recent research suggests that, because of developmental differences between adolescents and adults, adolescents may rely more on an experiential decision making style (Reyna and Farley, 2006). Positive affect for driving may be especially strong for teen drivers: for most adolescents, having a license to drive independently represents a developmental milestone on the journey to becoming an adult (Winston and Senserrick, 2006), and thus is likely to be associated with strong positive affect. Anecdotal reports from focus groups we have conducted with teen drivers (Author, unpublished data) indicate that teen drivers express a great deal of positive affect when talking about driving.

Positive affect also appears to play a role in gender differences in driving behavior: a study of attitudes toward driving indicated that young men are often more interested in driving and enjoy driving more than young women (Harré et al., 1996). In the fast-paced decision-making required in real-life driving situations, experiential decision making is likely to dominate, and thus positive affect may play a strong role in the behavioral outcome of driving decisions. The greater positive affect experienced by male drivers than female drivers may help explain their higher likelihood of engaging in risky driving behaviors.

The purpose of the current study was to examine age and gender differences in risky driving, and to determine whether these differences can be attributed to differences in how positive affect and risk perception contribute to risky driving behavior. In light of this, the following hypotheses were tested in this research.

Hypothesis 1

Male drivers report greater positive affect for risky driving behavior than female drivers.

Hypothesis 2

Female drivers report perceiving greater risk in risky driving behavior than male drivers.

Hypothesis 3

Positive affect and perceived risk mediate the relationship between sex and risky driving behavior.

Hypothesis 4

Teen drivers report greater positive affect for risky driving behavior than adult drivers.

Hypothesis 5

Adult drivers report perceiving greater risk in risky driving behavior than teen drivers.

Hypothesis 6

Positive affect and perceived risk mediate the relationship between age and risky driving behavior.

In addition, it is important to understand the roles of perceived risk and positive affect in driving behavior. Most dual process models posit that affective and cognitive judgments are not mutually exclusive and can influence each other (e.g., Loewenstein et al., 2001). Some research has suggested that judgments of risk are dependent upon affective judgments (e.g., the affect heuristic, Slovic and Peters, 2006). In these perspectives, affective reactions happen quickly and then form the context for interpreting risk information. Although this is a process that likely occurs over time, and may be most relevant when learning about novel stimuli (Peters and Slovic, 2000), the implications for existing affective and cognitive beliefs is that they should combine to affect driving decisions. That is, if beliefs about the riskiness of an action are dependent on one's feelings about the action, these two beliefs should jointly predict behavior. The present research explored the nature of the relationship between risk perceptions and positive affect with respect to risky driving behavior, specifically whether, in risky driving contexts, positive affect and risk perception function separately or in a combined judgment when predicting behavior. The following research question was posed:

• RQ1: Do positive affect and risk perception combine to predict driving behavior, or are the effects of affect and risk independent?

The present work further explored whether riskier drivers are differentially affected by affective or risk judgments than less risky drivers. Understanding whether drivers most prone to risk are more strongly affected by affective or cognitive judgments could help in developing targeted message to these risky drivers. The following research question was posed:

• RQ2: Do positive affect and risk perception differentially predict risky driving for men and women, or for teens and adults?