Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 15, Issue 3, March 2016, Pages 279-291
The Lancet Neurology

Series
Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: reconciling the syndrome, its diverse origins, and variation in expression

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00151-9Get rights and content

Summary

Recent discoveries about the pathogenesis and symptom structure of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are challenging traditional nosology and driving efforts to reconceptualise the diagnosis of autism, a goal made all the more pressing by new prospects for early identification, targeted intervention, and personalised-medicine approaches to specific autistic syndromes. Recognition that ASD represents the severe end of a continuous distribution of social communication abilities in the general population has stimulated attempts to standardise the measurement of autistic traits and to set appropriate clinical thresholds for diagnosis. Over the next decade, rapid advances in our understanding of symptom structure and the diversity of causes of ASD could be incorporated into the next evolution in the diagnosis of autism, with important implications for research, clinical practice, public health, and policy. As differential effects of personalised therapies are identified in relation to specific causes of autism, the benefits of an updated diagnostic nosology will translate into the delivery of more effective care for patients.

Introduction

Until little more than a decade ago, autism was considered to be rare and usually accompanied by intellectual disability; standardised methods to calibrate the nature and severity of symptoms were not available, and only rarely could the syndrome be traced to a biological cause. All of that has changed.1, 2, 3 Although clinician diagnosis maintains its tentative hold as the current standard for case designation, the diagnostic process is increasingly informed by scientific discoveries that have challenged traditional perspectives on the appropriate threshold for assigning a clinical diagnosis and on how diagnosis should relate to the specific cause of an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in an individual patient. In essence, rapid advances in the science of autism have occurred in each of Robins and Guze's classic proposed requirements for the valid classification of mental disorders, published in 1970 (clinical description, laboratory study, exclusion of other disorders, follow-up study, and family study).4

The diagnostic implications of these discoveries, especially recent findings related to symptom structure and biological cause, are numerous and largely encompassed by four overarching themes. The first theme comprises recognised limitations of the expert clinician paradigm as a standard for diagnosis.5 The second, the quantitative trait characteristics of ASD, reflects evidence that the defining features of the syndrome are continuously (not categorically) distributed in the general population and often arise from additive genetic influences that are shared with other neuropsychiatric conditions.6, 7, 8 Pronounced heterogeneity in the pathways of causation of ASD phenocopies,9 even within families,10 constitutes the third theme. And finally, the fourth theme covers pleiotropic effects, in which the same deleterious genetic variant can give rise to various neuropsychiatric syndromes (eg, epilepsy, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], learning disability, and intellectual disability) or other non-ASD comorbidities (motor coordination deficits or behavioural impairments),11, 12 depending in part on genetic background.13 Some or all of these issues present similar challenges in the diagnosis of other complex medical disorders (eg, hypertension, diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease).

The aim of this Series paper is to assimilate specific issues that have a bearing on the diagnosis of ASD. We begin by considering the strengths and limitations of current standards for diagnosis (invoking the first of the above-mentioned themes), before clarifying how the resulting diagnostic thresholds relate to the structure of symptoms in nature (the second theme). We review what is now known about the diversity of causes of autistic syndromes (the third and fourth themes), and finally discuss how knowledge of causation and symptom structure might be incorporated into the next evolution in the diagnostic approach to ASD. The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5),14 published in 2013, represents an attempt to modify the diagnostic process in tandem with the pace of recent discovery. However, to meet the complex needs of people affected by ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders, we need to continue to build upon and refine the existing taxonomic framework in a manner that flexibly and faithfully accommodates advances in scientific understanding.

Section snippets

Diagnostic criteria

We begin with the paradigm of clinician diagnosis, which is the historical bedrock of case designation. Several noteworthy scientific advances were recognised in the development of DSM-5,14 which marks the first major revision of the manual since the fourth edition (DSM-IV)15 was published in 1994. The DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD are presented in panel 1. We note that the diagnostic criteria for autism in the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10)16 are keyed to

The evolving definition of disorder and shifting diagnostic boundaries

Perhaps more so than for many neuropsychiatric disorders, the evolution of our conception of what autism is, and how its diagnostic boundaries should be established, has been far from linear since the initial classic descriptions over 70 years ago by Leo Kanner25 and Hans Asperger.26 In many ways, these pioneer clinicians got so much right. In small case-series descriptions (11 children in Kanner's description of “autistic disturbances of affective contact”; four children in Asperger's

Standardised measures of symptom burden

A range of screening and diagnostic instruments for ASD has been developed over the past two decades.23 However, a long list of potential methods to choose from is not necessarily a good thing for either the clinical or the research field, particularly in view of the fact that the properties of many of these instruments have not been extensively studied or well established. However, several instruments have been widely validated and are increasingly used in research and clinical practice in

Quantitative approaches to the measurement of autistic traits

When standardised methods for quantitative assessment of ASD symptoms and traits have been applied to the general population, the unequivocal finding from a host of studies, implementing numerous methods of measurement, is that the traits and features that characterise autism are continuously—not bimodally—distributed in nature.6, 8, 44, 48 This observation implies that there is an arbitrary nature to diagnostic cutoffs in ASD, and points to the need for methods of the type that have been

Causation and an impending revolution in ASD diagnosis

The past decade has witnessed an explosion in scientific discovery of the causes of autism. Although, so far, neither a laboratory test nor a neural signature that can reliably establish the presence of a non-syndromic ASD is available, a rapidly increasing proportion of all cases—approaching the majority—can be attributed to the influence of deleterious genetic variants or combinations of variants, and it is expected that understanding of the genetics of autism will play a major part in

Advancing the frontier of early diagnosis

Another traditional diagnostic boundary that is being challenged by advances in science is the timing of diagnosis. It has long been recognised that ASDs have an early onset, and a primary motivation for seeking to lower the age of diagnosis of ASD is to enable evidence-based interventions to be put in place.76, 77 Several converging lines of evidence support the view that early intervention can lead to more positive outcomes: the presence of higher neural plasticity early in life;77 evidence

Factors associated with under-diagnosis

Over the past decade, it has become clear that several social and cultural factors are associated with the likelihood of receiving a community clinical diagnosis of ASD.105 Even when showing the same level of ASD symptoms, girls are less likely to be diagnosed than are boys, and those who do receive a diagnosis have more intellectual and behavioural impairment than do boys with a diagnosis.58 The extent to which this disparity can be attributed to the thresholds on current screening and

Conclusions and future directions

Key considerations for a reconceptualisation of diagnosis in autism, informed by the scientific advances described above, are summarised in panel 4. At times, the process of translation of scientific findings into clinical practice can feel frustratingly slow to clinicians and patients alike. However, the pace of discovery that has shaped our understanding of what autism is has been very rapid over the past decade. When combined, accumulating information about what causes ASD in any individual,

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched PubMed for papers published between Jan 1, 2000, and Jan 31, 2015, using the search terms “autism”, “diagnosis”, “family studies”, and “genetics”. We also searched our own files and the reference lists of selected papers. We selected only papers published in English. The final reference list was generated on the basis of relevance to the topics covered in this Series paper, the aim of which is to synthesise recent scientific advances that have a direct bearing on the challenges of

References (112)

  • JN Constantino

    How continua converge in nature: cognition, social competence, and autistic syndromes

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • DH Geschwind et al.

    Gene hunting in autism spectrum disorder: on the path to precision medicine

    Lancet Neurol

    (2015)
  • MW State et al.

    Leveraging genetics and genomics to define the causes of mental illness

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • M Shetreat-Klein et al.

    Abnormalities of joint mobility and gait in children with autism spectrum disorders

    Brain Dev

    (2014)
  • GB Schaefer et al.

    Clinical genetics evaluation in identifying the etiology of autism spectrum disorders: 2013 guideline revisions

    Genet Med

    (2013)
  • EJ Jones et al.

    Developmental pathways to autism: a review of prospective studies of infants at risk

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2014)
  • J Green et al.

    Parent-mediated intervention versus no intervention for infants at high risk of autism: a parallel, single-blind, randomised trial

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • S Ozonoff et al.

    A prospective study of the emergence of early behavioral signs of autism

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • S Ozonoff et al.

    The broader autism phenotype in infancy: when does it emerge?

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • K Chawarska et al.

    Decreased spontaneous attention to social scenes in 6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • M Elsabbagh et al.

    Infant neural sensitivity to dynamic eye gaze is associated with later emerging autism

    Curr Biol

    (2012)
  • Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010

    MMWR Surveill Summ

    (2014)
  • E Robins et al.

    Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1970)
  • C Lord et al.

    A multisite study of the clinical diagnosis of different autism spectrum disorders

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • JN Constantino

    The quantitative nature of autistic social impairment

    Pediatr Res

    (2011)
  • T Gaugler et al.

    Most genetic risk for autism resides with common variation

    Nat Genet

    (2014)
  • A Ronald et al.

    Symptoms of autism and ADHD: a Swedish twin study examining their overlap

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2014)
  • H Lee et al.

    Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders

    JAMA

    (2014)
  • RK Yuen et al.

    Whole-genome sequencing of quartet families with autism spectrum disorder

    Nat Med

    (2015)
  • YS Kim et al.

    Recent challenges to the psychiatric diagnostic nosology: a focus on the genetics and genomics of neurodevelopmental disorders

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2014)
  • SE McCarthy et al.

    De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate chromatin remodeling and support a genetic overlap with autism and intellectual disability

    Mol Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • A Moreno-De-Luca et al.

    The role of parental cognitive, behavioral, and motor profiles in clinical variability in individuals with chromosome 16p11.2 deletions

    JAMA Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2013)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision

    (1992)
  • K Gotham et al.

    Trajectories of autism severity in children using standardized ADOS scores

    Pediatrics

    (2012)
  • T Charman

    Early identification and intervention in autism spectrum disorders: Some progress but not as much as we hoped

    Int J Speech Lang Pathol

    (2014)
  • N Marrus et al.

    Lack of effect of risperidone on core autistic symptoms: data from a longitudinal study

    J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol

    (2014)
  • VH Bal et al.

    Daily living skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder from 2 to 21 years of age

    Autism

    (2015)
  • SH Lee et al.

    Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs

    Nat Genet

    (2013)
  • T Charman et al.

    Measurement Issues: Screening and diagnostic instruments for autism spectrum disorders—lessons from research and practice

    Child Adolesc Ment Health

    (2013)
  • L Kanner

    Autistic disturbances of affective contact

    Nervous Child

    (1943)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1980)
  • M Rutter

    Diagnosis and definition of childhood autism

    J Autism Child Schizophr

    (1978)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1987)
  • SS Jeste et al.

    Disentangling the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder through genetic findings

    Nat Rev Neurol

    (2014)
  • T Charman

    Variability in neurodevelopmental disorders: Evidence from autism

  • JN Miller et al.

    The external validity of Asperger disorder: lack of evidence from the domain of neuropsychology

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text