Articles
Serotype-specific effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine against pneumococcal pneumonia in adults aged 65 years or older: a multicentre, prospective, test-negative design study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30049-XGet rights and content

Summary

Background

The serotype-specific effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) against pneumococcal pneumonia has not been established in people aged 65 years or older. We assessed the effectiveness of PPV23 in this population.

Methods

For this multicentre, prospective study, we enrolled all individuals aged 65 years or older with community-onset pneumonia who visited four study hospitals in Japan between Sept 28, 2011, and Aug 23, 2014. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from sputum and blood samples, and serotyped by the capsular Quellung method. Sputum samples were further tested by PCR assay to identify pneumococcal DNA, and positive samples were examined for 50 serotypes by a nanofluidic real-time PCR assay. Urine samples were tested by a urinary antigen test. Serotype-specific vaccine effectiveness was estimated using the test-negative design.

Findings

2621 eligible patients visited the study hospitals, of whom 585 did not have sputum samples available and were excluded from our analysis. 419 (21%) of 2036 patients were positive for pneumococcal infection (232 by sputum culture, 317 by sputum PCR, 197 by urinary antigen test, and 14 by blood culture). 522 (26%) patients were judged to be vaccinated in the analyses. Effectiveness of PPV23 was 27·4% (95% CI 3·2 to 45·6) against all pneumococcal pneumonia, 33·5% (5·6 to 53·1) against PPV23 serotypes, and 2·0% (−78·9 to 46·3) against non-PPV23 serotypes. Although no significant differences between subgroups were seen, higher protection was noted in people younger than 75 years, women, and individuals with lobar pneumonia or health-care-associated pneumonia.

Interpretation

PPV23 showed low to moderate effectiveness against vaccine serotype pneumococcal pneumonia in people aged 65 years or older. To improve the current pneumococcal vaccination programme, the variability of PPV23 effectiveness in different groups of older people must be further investigated.

Funding

Pfizer and Nagasaki University.

Introduction

Pneumococcal diseases, including pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease, are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older adults (aged ≥65 years) worldwide.1, 2, 3 Although invasive pneumococcal disease presents the most severe form with a high case fatality rate, pneumonia is the most common manifestation of pneumococcal disease in adults.4 The disease burden is rapidly increasing in many countries because of a higher risk in older age groups; therefore, the control of pneumococcal pneumonia is a public health priority in countries with an ageing population, such as Japan.5

To prevent pneumococcal disease, immunisation with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) has been recommended for high-risk groups and older adults. Although there is good evidence that PPV23 reduces the risk of invasive pneumococcal disease in older people, its protective effect against pneumonia is controversial.6, 7, 8, 9 According to recent meta-analyses of trials and observational studies, the vaccine did not have a significant protective effect in preventing all-cause pneumonia and pneumococcal pneumonia.10, 11

Recently, a vaccine trial in the Netherlands (the CAPITA trial) showed the efficacy of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) against vaccine serotype pneumococcal pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease in adults aged 65 years or older.12 This finding has raised the question of whether PPV23 should be replaced by PCV13 in this group. Administration of both vaccines is currently recommended for this age group by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in the USA,6 but the supporting evidence is insufficient. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the serotype-specific effect of PPV23 against pneumococcal pneumonia.

We did a multicentre, prospective study to elucidate the serotype-specific vaccine effectiveness of PPV23 against pneumococcal pneumonia in people aged 65 years or older in Japan. We did subgroup analyses to explore differences in vaccine effectiveness by population characteristics.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

A systematic review published in 2016 examined the evidence from randomised controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) for preventing pneumococcal pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. The meta-analysis of three trials found a protective, but non-significant, trend. Findings from another systematic review published in 2016, which assessed evidence from observational studies, showed the effectiveness of PPV23 for prevention of community-acquired pneumonia. Nine cohort studies and seven case-control studies were identified, and the meta-analysis showed a non-significant protective effect of the vaccine. we searched PubMed for English language articles published between Jan 1, 1977, and July 20, 2016, with the terms “streptococcus pneumoniae”, “pneumococcus”, “pneumococcal”, “serotype”, “polysaccharide vaccine”, and “adult”. We also reviewed relevant articles identified in previous systematic reviews. This search retrieved no studies that investigated the serotype-specific efficacy or effectiveness of PPV23 against pneumococcal pneumonia.

Added value of this study

To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate the serotype-specific effectiveness of PPV23 against pneumococcal pneumonia in older adults (aged ≥65 years). We report that the effectiveness of PPV23 against vaccine serotype pneumococcal pneumonia was low to moderate and differed by vaccine serotype, and that no protection was shown for non-vaccine serotypes. Although no significant differences between subgroups were seen, vaccine effectiveness was higher in specific groups such as people younger than 75 years, women, and individuals with lobar pneumonia or health-care-associated pneumonia.

Implications of all the available evidence

In view of the large number of older patients with pneumonia, the introduction of an effective pneumococcal vaccine for this age group could have a large public health impact. The currently recommended PPV23 prevents vaccine serotype pneumococcal pneumonia, but its effectiveness is low to moderate. Furthermore, the effects of PPV23 on pneumonia burden might lessen after the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children. For effective control of adult pneumococcal pneumonia, vaccine policy makers must monitor the proportion of vaccine serotypes in all cases of pneumococcal pneumonia and consider the variability of PPV23 effectiveness in different population groups.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

This study was done as part of a multicentre prospective investigation of adult pneumonia by the Adult Pneumonia Study Group-Japan (APSG-J).5 The APSG-J study was done at four community-based hospitals in Japan from Sept 28, 2011, to Aug 23, 2014. All inpatients and outpatients aged 15 years or older were screened for community-onset pneumonia by hospital physicians, and eligible patients were identified using a standardised case definition. To investigate the effectiveness of PPV23, we focused

Results

Between Sept 28, 2011, and Aug 23, 2014, 2621 patients aged 65 years or older with pneumonia visited the study hospitals. Sputum samples were not obtained from 585 patients (figure). Compared with patients whose sputum samples were available, patients whose sputum samples were not available were younger, more likely to live in the central part of Japan, more frequently treated as outpatients, and less frequently tested by urinary antigen test (appendix pp 3–4). After excluding these patients,

Discussion

In this study in older Japanese people, we found low to moderate effectiveness of PPV23 against vaccine serotype pneumococcal pneumonia, but no protective effect against non-vaccine serotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show serotype-specific effectiveness of PPV23 against pneumococcal pneumonia in the general, older population.

PPV23 has been recommended for high-risk individuals and older adults in many countries; however, its protective effect has not been fully established.6

References (31)

  • K Morimoto et al.

    The burden and etiology of community-onset pneumonia in the aging Japanese population: a multicenter prospective study

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • S Tomczyk et al.

    Use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among adults aged ≥65 years: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2014)
  • A Huss et al.

    Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis

    CMAJ

    (2009)
  • S Moberley et al.

    Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2013)
  • LA Jackson et al.

    Effectiveness of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in older adults

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (143)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Members listed at end of paper

    View full text