We did a systematic historical examination of published literature relating to army-wide measles outbreaks and related subjects such as “empyema”, “pneumonia”, “streptococcal infection”, and other topics discussed in the text, with The Index Catalog of the Library of the Surgeon General's Office, The Index Medicus, and electronic and non-electronic catalogues at the US National Library of Medicine, and US National Institutes of Health. We assessed all relevant publications in the available
Historical ReviewA forgotten epidemic that changed medicine: measles in the US Army, 1917–18
Section snippets
Background
The widely known 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic killed thousands of soldiers in US army training camps.1 However, 1 year earlier a less well known respiratory disease epidemic of even higher case-fatality than the Spanish influenza—measles—struck the same camps. The investigation of measles led to medical breakthroughs and created the blueprint for the military response to the 1918 influenza pandemic.
In 1917, measles was a suspected viral disease that developed in 2–3 year cycles in large
Army measles epidemiology
For reasons that were initially unclear, measles in 1917–18 produced the highest infection rates in 97 years of continuous military surveillance7 and extreme case-fatality from aggressive bronchopneumonias and other complications. Infection rates were highest in camps whose recruiting areas included rural and remote locales where susceptibility to measles was most common (eg, the south, mid-west, and non-coastal west USA; appendix p 33).13, 15, 16 Severity statistics were striking:12, 17, 18
The effects of bacteria on measles complications
In most army camps, the predominant cause of postmeasles pneumonia and of primary pneumonia was Streptococcus haemolyticus, now known as Streptococcus pyogenes,25, 37, 41, 42, 43 typically isolated in pure culture from pneumonias, empyemas, pleural effusions, and from other postmeasles complication sites.5, 17, 19, 22, 23, 24, 26, 38, 44, 45, 46 Streptococcus pneumoniae type 1, 2, 3, or group 4 (including many previously untypeable pneumococci) predominated in a few camps, but S haemolyticus
Clinical, pathological, and radiological measles complications
Although uncomplicated camp measles was otherwise clinically unremarkable, complicated cases typically developed early pronounced laryngitis and tracheitis leading to bronchitis, persistent cough, and diffuse moist rales.23, 24, 62, 63, 64, 65 State-of-the-art radiographic facilities were available in most camps.65, 66 and army physicians were skilled in clinically diagnosing common low-fatality endemic pneumonia (historically pneumococcal lobar pneumonia).67 In the absence of typical pneumonic
Autopsy pathology and post-mortem bacteriology
In 1917, bronchopneumonia was understood best as a post-mortem pathological diagnosis rather than as a clinical description, and its association with epidemic viral respiratory disease was not fully appreciated. The pre-eminent pathologist of the camp epidemics, Johns Hopkins' William MacCallum (1874–1944), coined the term interstitial bronchopneumonia to describe 1917 measles (and later, 1918 influenza) autopsy findings (figure 3).14, 24, 28, 63, 69 In most of these measles autopsies, S
Prevention and infection control of measles
In recognition of the aetiological link between nasopharyngeal-streptococcal carriage and postmeasles and primary pneumonia, all army camps strengthened infection control practices. Some of these measures included longer and more stringent isolation of arriving recruits than previously; policing to prevent congregation in barracks, canteens, theatres, Young Men's Christian Associations, and elsewhere; head-to-foot staggering of adjacent barrack cots; continual wet mopping and disinfection of
Treatment
In the preantibiotic era, pneumonia treatment was directed at the prevention and prompt management of complications, including treatment with digitalis and cardiac stimulants (caffeine, camphor, and epinephrine) to prevent pneumonia-associated cardiac failure.17 Camphor was also used for coryza, and camphor or codeine for cough, with morphine for cough or pain,23, 36 and drainage of or operation on empyemas.10, 11, 34, 59, 60, 78, 79 Antistreptococcal hyperimmune horse serums were given
Discussion
The response to the 1917–18 measles epidemic was a striking moment in time when medicine became recognisably modern. This period is notable for integration of comprehensive findings from multidisciplinary investigations to control an explosive epidemic in so-called real time. The broader understanding derived from such correlative information stimulated both clinical and basic research, and improved science-based clinical management (eg, infection control, bacteriological diagnosis, and
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (121)
- et al.
The role of radiology in influenza: novel H1N1 and lessons learned from the 1918 pandemic
J Am Coll Radiol
(2010) - et al.
Pathogenesis of influenza-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome
Lancet Infect Dis
(2014) Fever of war: the Influenza epidemic in the US Army during World War I
(2005)Measles
Experimental measles: a review
J Am Med Assoc
(1919)- et al.
Experimental measles in the monkey; a preliminary note
Public Health Rep
(1911) The epidemiology of the sputum-borne diseases and its relation to the health of the national forces
Mil Surg
(1919)Inflammatory diseases of the respiratory tract (bronchitis; influenza; bronchopneumonia; lobar pneumonia)
A brief summary of the viral statistics of the US Army during the World War
Mil Surg
(1922)Health of the troops in the United States during 1918
Mil Surg
(1919)