Review
Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01253-8Get rights and content

Summary

Many studies have reported the results of interventions to reduce illness through improvements in drinking water, sanitation facilities, and hygiene practices in less developed countries. There has, however, been no formal systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the evidence of the relative effectiveness of these interventions. We developed a comprehensive search strategy designed to identify all peer-reviewed articles, in any language, that presented water, sanitation, or hygiene interventions. We examined only those articles with specific measurement of diarrhoea morbidity as a health outcome in non-outbreak conditions. We screened the titles and, where necessary, the abstracts of 2120 publications. 46 studies were judged to contain relevant evidence and were reviewed in detail. Data were extracted from these studies and pooled by meta-analysis to provide summary estimates of the effectiveness of each type of intervention. All of the interventions studied were found to reduce significantly the risks of diarrhoeal illness. Most of the interventions had a similar degree of impact on diarrhoeal illness, with the relative risk estimates from the overall meta-analyses ranging between 0·63 and 0·75. The results generally agree with those from previous reviews, but water quality interventions (point-of-use water treatment) were found to be more effective than previously thought, and multiple interventions (consisting of combined water, sanitation, and hygiene measures) were not more effective than interventions with a single focus. There is some evidence of publication bias in the findings from the hygiene and water treatment interventions.

Section snippets

Search strategy

Database searches of the Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, Medline, and Pascal Biomed were done with keyword searches that paired aspects of “water”, “sanitation”, and “hygiene” with “diarrhoea”, and, separately, with “intervention”. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was particularly useful for identifying intervention studies; Embase and Medline provided very good coverage of English language papers; and LILACS and Pascal Biomed provided coverage of foreign language, Latin

Results

The titles and abstracts (if available) from 2120 publications were screened. 50 articles,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 representing 46 studies in less developed countries, were identified, of which 38 studies presented a measure of relative risk or data from which a relative risk could be calculated.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,

Discussion

The range of results derived from individual studies was wide, but the overall estimates seem to suggest an important role for each intervention in the reduction of diarrhoeal disease (figure 3). Previous reviews have assessed the effect of similar intervention types on the frequency of diarrhoeal illness, most notably Esrey and colleagues5 and Curtis and Cairncross.61 By grouping some of the categories used by Esrey and colleagues5 and converting the reported percentage reduction in diarrhoeal

Conclusions

Despite the fact that the identified studies were done in a wide range of settings, in many countries, and over many years, there was found to be a strong consistency in the effectiveness of the interventions. Our review suggests that water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions, as well as their combination, are effective at reducing diarrhoeal illness, and water quality interventions (point-of-use water treatment) were more effective than has been previously acknowledged. However, publication

Search strategy and selection criteria

These are discussed in detail in the Methods section on page 34.

References (65)

  • JM Wilson et al.

    Sustained improvements in hygiene behaviour amongst village women in Lombok, Indonesia

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (1993)
  • D Blum et al.

    The Imo state (Nigeria) drinking water supply and sanitation project, 1. Description of the project, evaluation methods, and impact on intervening variables

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (1990)
  • SR Huttly et al.

    The Imo state (Nigeria) drinking water supply and sanitation project, 2. Impact on dracunculiasis, diarrhoea and nutritional status

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (1990)
  • V Curtis et al.

    Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • M Kosek et al.

    The magnitude of the global burden of diarrhoeal disease from studies published 1992–2000

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2003)
  • A Prüss et al.

    Estimating the burden of disease from water, sanitation and hygiene at a global level

    Environ Health Perspect

    (2002)
  • SA Esrey et al.

    Interventions for the control of diarrhoeal diseases among young children: improving water supplies and excreta disposal facilities

    Bull World Health Organ

    (1985)
  • SA Esrey et al.

    Epidemiologic evidence for health benefits from improved water and sanitation in developing countries

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1986)
  • SA Esrey et al.

    Effects of improved water supply and sanitation on ascariasis, diarrhoea, dracunculiasis, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and trachoma

    Bull World Health Organ

    (1991)
  • D Blum et al.

    Measuring the impact of water supply and sanitation investments on diarrhoeal diseases: problems of methodology

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1983)
  • K Rothman et al.

    Modern epidemiology

    (1998)
  • L Fewtrell et al.

    Water, sanitation and hygiene: interventions and diarrhoea–a systematic review and meta-analysis

    (2004)
  • M Egger et al.

    Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context

    (2001)
  • CB Begg et al.

    Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias

    Biometrics

    (1994)
  • B Torún

    Environmental and educational interventions against diarrhoea in Guatemala

  • BK Sircar et al.

    Effect of handwashing on the incidence of diarrhoea in a Calcutta slum

    J Diarrhoeal Dis Res

    (1987)
  • BF Stanton et al.

    An educational intervention for altering water-sanitation behaviours to reduce childhood diarrhea in urban Bangladesh. II. A randomized trial to assess the impact of the intervention on hygienic behaviours and rates of diarrhea

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1987)
  • N Alam et al.

    Mothers' personal and domestic hygiene and diarrhoea incidence in young children in rural Bangladesh

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • W Lee et al.

    The impact of a community based health education program on the incidence of diarrheal disease in southern Thailand

    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

    (1991)
  • PA Haggerty et al.

    Methodological approaches in a baseline study of diarrhoeal morbidity in weaning-age children in rural Zaire

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • PA Haggerty et al.

    Community-based hygiene education to reduce diarrhoeal disease in rural Zaire: impact of the intervention on diarrhoeal morbidity

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • NS Shahid et al.

    Hand washing with soap reduces diarrhoea and spread of bacterial pathogens in a Bangladesh village

    J Diarrhoeal Dis Res

    (1996)
  • Cited by (1166)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text