Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed?

Abstract

Objective: Electroencephalography (EEG) source reconstruction is becoming recognized as a useful technique to non-invasively localize the epileptic focus. Whereas, large array magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems are available since quite some time, application difficulties have previously prevented multichannel EEG recordings. Recently, however, EEG systems which allow for quick (10–20 min) application of, and recording from, up to 125 electrodes have become available. The purpose of the current investigation was to systematically compare the accuracy of epileptic source localization with high electrode density to that obtained with sparser electrode setups.

Methods: Interictal epileptiform activity was recorded with 123 electrodes in 14 epileptic patients undergoing presurgical evaluation. Each single epileptiform potential was down sampled to 63 and 31 electrodes, and a distributed source model (EPIFOCUS) was used to reconstruct the sources with the 3 different electrode configurations. The localization accuracy with the 3 electrode setups was then assessed, by determining the distance from the inverse solution, maximum of each single spike to the epileptogenic lesion.

Results: In 9/14 patients, the distance from the EEG source to the lesion was significantly smaller with 63 than with 31 electrodes, and increasing the number of electrodes to 123 increased this number of patients from 9 to 11. Simulations confirmed the relation between the number of electrodes and localization accuracy.

Conclusions: The results illustrate the necessity of multichannel EEG recordings for high source location accuracy in epileptic patients.

Introduction

It is now recognized that electromagnetic non-invasive source imaging may localize, precisely, primary epileptic foci with high spatial and temporal resolution. To achieve this, and to differentiate primary foci from propagated areas, a sufficient spatial sampling is needed. It has been demonstrated (Bendat and Piersol, 1986) that the sampling rate (both spatial and temporal) has to be at least 2.5 times the highest frequency component of the signal (the Nyquist frequency) in order to avoid aliasing (i.e. contamination from higher frequencies through increase of energy in lower frequency bands). As opposed to temporal sampling, spatial sampling is by definition non-continuous, which makes low pass filtering, in order to avoid aliasing, impossible (Srinivasan et al., 1998). Consequently, high spatial sampling is necessary to correctly characterize the topographical details of all frequencies as well as to avoid distortion of frequencies of interest from frequencies above the Nyquist frequency. To some extent, the problem can be diminished by the fact that the scalp acts as a spatial low pass filter, attenuating the undesired high frequency information (Nunez, 1981, Srinivasan et al., 1996). Even so, recording, for instance with the commonly used 21 electrode setup (corresponding to 6 cm inter-electrode distance), is definitely insufficient to adequately sample the spatial frequencies of around 3 cm appearing, for example, in early evoked potential components (Spitzer et al., 1989, Gevins, 1990). In a simulation study by Vanrumste et al. (2000), addressing the effect of volume conductor model errors on EEG dipole source localization, smaller localization errors were found for 53 rather than for 27 electrodes, even if this difference was quite small. Theoretical and experimental studies by Srinivasan et al. (1998) have demonstrated that a minimum of 100 electrodes is needed to properly sample the electric field from the full head surface.

In epileptic patients, electromagnetic source localization procedures are becoming an important tool in presurgical epilepsy investigations of many centers. Even though, in most EEG studies, only standard electrodes setups (between 20 and 30 electrodes) have been used, the localization precision has increased, and some groups have reported accuracy down to the sublobar level (Scherg et al., 1999, Michel et al., 1999, Fuchs et al., 1999) and the possibility to differentiate between deep and superficial temporal sources (Lantz et al., 1997, Lantz et al., 2001a). A number of investigators have used high density MEG recordings (more than 100 sensors) in epileptic patients (Paetau et al., 1999, Lamusuo et al., 1999, Scherg et al., 1999, Baumgartner et al., 2000), but only in a few studies (Herrendorf et al., 2000, Waberski et al., 2000, Gross et al., 2000) has multichannel EEG been used in epilepsy investigations, and in these cases only with 64 electrodes. To our knowledge, neither EEG source localization results obtained from data recorded with more than 100 electrodes has been previously presented, nor has the importance of dense spatial sampling for EEG source localization accuracy in epilepsy been systematically addressed.

It has been argued (Rosenow and Lüders, 2001) that large array MEG systems should be able to obtain data faster and in a more standardized way than modern EEG systems. However, recently EEG systems allowing for quick application of, and recording from, up to 125 electrodes have become available. Despite this, most epilepsy centers still base their epileptic source localizations on data recorded with standard setups of around 30 electrodes, which according to the theoretical studies should be considered as a severe subsampling. For this reason, studies comparing the results with different electrode setups are imperative. The purpose of the current investigation was to use a recently developed method for distributed source modeling (EPIFOCUS, Grave de Peralta et al., 2001, Lantz et al., 2001a) to compare the accuracy of EEG source localization results with different electrode densities, both for interictal epileptiform activity and for simulated data.