Processing of global, but not local, motion direction is deficient in schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00222-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Visual motion processing is compromised in a substantial proportion of schizophrenic patients, but precise neural mechanisms underlying the motion-processing deficit have not yet been elaborated. The visual motion pathway includes a local and a global processing stage, each of which has distinct neural substrates. Here, we attempt to identify the stage(s) that are implicated in impaired motion processing of schizophrenia—local, global, or both. For schizophrenia patients (n=23) and normal controls (n=26), we measured (1) the thresholds for detecting the motion direction of a random dot pattern, a task that requires global motion processing, and (2) the thresholds for detecting the motion direction of a grating, a task that requires only local motion processing, using psychophysical methods. Schizophrenia patients showed elevated thresholds for detecting the direction of coherent motion, particularly for the high dot-density target. In contrast, schizophrenia patients showed normal thresholds for detecting the direction of motion of a grating. The results indicate that the global, but not the local, processing stage of the visual motion system is compromised in schizophrenia patients, thus implicating motion-sensitive brain areas that possess large receptive fields for spatial and temporal integration, such as Middle Temporal Area/Medial Superior Temporal Area.

Introduction

In schizophrenia, many cognitive, affective, motor and perceptual behaviors are impaired. Some of these impairments directly point to the brain processes that underlie the mental disorder. One example is the impairment of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM), which appears in many schizophrenic patients and in a proportion of their first-degree relatives Diefendorf and Dodge, 1908, Holzman et al., 1973, Holzman et al., 1974, Clementz and Sweeney, 1990, Iacono et al., 1992, Levy et al., 1993, Friedman et al., 1995. Smooth pursuit is a complex behavior that involves many sensory, cognitive, and oculomotor processes. The requirement to detect a moving target of interest generally initiates smooth pursuit eye movement. Assessing the functional integrity of the motion processing system therefore assumes importance for probing into the brain mechanisms underlying the smooth pursuit impairment in schizophrenia. Visual motion detection and movement-related detection are compromised in schizophrenia patients Wertheim et al., 1985, O'Donnell et al., 1996, Stuve et al., 1997, Chen et al., 1999a, Chen et al., 1999b. Here, we attempt to identify the stage of motion processing, global or local, that is deficient in schizophrenia.

It is generally believed that motion processing begins with neural processing in retina. The neural pathway of motion processing continues to the lateral geniculate nucleus and to the striate cortex (V1). Up to this point, neural processing of visual information is not motion-specific, that is, other aspects of visual signals, such as form, contrast, and color, are processed in the same brain areas. The motion signals are then projected from V1 to the extrastriate cortex, where two of its more than 20 areas, middle temporal area (MT) and medial superior temporal area (MST), process motion-specific information. In some parts of MT, motion processing is similar to that in V1 and focuses on the local signals, and in other parts, however, motion processing becomes global (e.g., Born and Tootell, 1992). In the local stage, motion detection occurs when a moving target activates many independent motion-sensitive units that correspond to different spatial locations. The receptive field of these units is usually small and thus responds to only a restricted part of the visual stimulus (e.g., Sclar et al., 1990). The responses of these neural units at the local stage could be used to represent target movement if the motion signals were uniform across space. For example, the direction of a moving grating can be ascertained by viewing only a portion of it, since all parts of the grating move in the same direction and at the same speed and as a whole. The neural units at the local stage, however, are unable to generate a coherent motion percept if motion signals are not identical at different spatial locations. In this instance, global processing is required. The global motion processing comprises neural activity in other parts of MT and in MST, where neural units have large receptive field sizes (e.g., Sclar et al., 1990). Thus, these neural units are capable of integrating dispersed motion signals across space and of generating the perception of a coherent whole by taking into account the fact that the motion signals are usually spatially varied (e.g., Tanaka et al., 1986, Born and Tootell, 1992). For example, in a random dot pattern, the dots move independently of each other, and the neural activities that respond to the individual moving dots at the local stage therefore differ from each other. To generate a motion percept of the coherent whole in a random dot pattern, motion processing at the global stage must combine the responses from the local-stage neural units that are activated by individual moving dots. The global direction of the random dot pattern can be judged only by apprehending at least a significant portion of the whole target Nakayama and Silverman, 1984, Williams and Sekuler, 1984. These local and global stages of motion processing show different functional properties Adelson and Movshon, 1982, Williams and Sekuler, 1984, Nakayama, 1985. This distinction between the local and the global stages is mainly, but not exclusively, in the spatial domain.

With respect to schizophrenia, an important question is to identify the specific stage, local or global, of motion processing that is responsible for the motion-processing deficit. Answering this question may provide information not only about the functional characteristics of the affected motion processing system, but also about the neural substrates underlying the motion detection deficit, and hence about the smooth pursuit impairments and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

In this study, we attempt to identify the motion processing stage(s) that are implicated in schizophrenia, using paradigms widely employed in physiological and psychophysical studies. Specifically, we determined the response effectiveness with which schizophrenic patients detect global motion direction signals (coherent motion) and local motion direction signals (movement of gratings).

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-three schizophrenic patients participated in this study. These patients were discharged during the past year from a psychiatric hospital and met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Consensus diagnoses were made independently, and blind to the experimental design and results, by experienced clinicians based on a review of a standardized interview (Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV, Spitzer et al., 1994), conducted by trained interviewers, and an

Coherent motion

As described above, we determined thresholds for detecting coherent motion at each of the three dot densities, based on a psychometric function for each subject. As a threshold, we used the motion coherence level that yielded 75% accuracy in performance. Percent correct scores for judging the direction of motion were fitted as a function of the motion coherence level (see Fig. 2). This graph, commonly termed a psychometric function, was plotted for each of the three dot densities, based on the

Discussion

Schizophrenia patients differed from nonpsychiatric controls on one of the two types of motion perception tasks employed in this study. The patients showed a selective deficit in detecting coherent motion of random dots, which requires global processing of the target. In this global motion detection task, motion information from many spatial and temporal locations must be combined in order to render a correct perceptual judgment about the direction of movement of the random dot pattern. In

Acknowledgments

We thank the subjects for participation. We thank Ms. Summer Sheremata for testing subjects and Dr. Laurie Terespulsky for recruiting subjects. This research was supported in part by a NARSAD Young Investigator Award, by USPHS Grants MH 61824, 31154, 31340, 49487, 01020, by a grant from the Roy Hunt Foundation, by a research grant from the William T. Milton Foundation of Harvard University, and by a Rappaport Mental Health Scholar Award.

References (54)

  • A.H. Wertheim et al.

    High thresholds for movement perception in schizophrenia may indicate abnormal extraneous noise levels of central vestibular activity

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1985)
  • D.W. Williams et al.

    Coherent global motion percept from stochastic local motions

    Vision Res.

    (1984)
  • E.H. Adelson et al.

    Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns

    Nature

    (1982)
  • P. Azzopardi et al.

    Motion discrimination in cortically blind patients

    Brain

    (2001)
  • M.S. Beauchamp et al.

    Graded effects of spatial and featural attention on human area MT and associated motion processing areas

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1997)
  • V.K. Berezovskii et al.

    Specificity of projections from wide-field and local motion-processing regions within the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • R.T. Born et al.

    Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area

    Nature

    (1992)
  • S. Celebrini et al.

    Neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity to motion signals in extrastriate area MST of the macaque monkey

    J. Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Smooth pursuit to a movement flow and associated perceptual judgments

  • Y. Chen et al.

    Psychophysical isolation of a motion-processing deficit in schizophrenics and their relatives and its association with impaired smooth pursuit

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1999)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Motion perception in schizophrenia

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • J. Chey et al.

    Perceptual organization in schizophrenia: utilization of the Gestalt principles

    J. Abnorm. Psychology

    (1997)
  • B.A. Clementz et al.

    Is eye movement dysfunction a biological marker for schizophrenia? A methodological review

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1990)
  • N.G. Collin et al.

    The effect of ablation of frontal eye-fields and superior colliculi on visualstability and movement discrimination in rhesus monkeys

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1980)
  • A.R. Diefendorf et al.

    An experimental study of the ocular reactions of the insane from photographic records

    Brain

    (1908)
  • C.J. Downing et al.

    Spatial and temporal summation in the detection of motion in stochastic ramdom dot displays

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl.

    (1988)
  • L. Friedman et al.

    Smooth pursuit performance in patients with affective disorders or schizophrenia and normal controls: analysis with specific oculomotor measures, RMS error and qualitative ratings

    Psychol. Med.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (129)

    • Heightened perception of illusory motion is associated with symptom severity in schizophrenia patients

      2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
    • Examining motion speed processing in schizophrenia using the flash lag illusion

      2020, Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent studies on visual processing in schizophrenia demonstrate numerous perceptual deficits (Cutting and Dunne, 1986; Phillipson and Harris, 1985; Waters et al., 2014; Bunney Jr et al., 1999; Kantrowitz et al., 2009; Butler et al., 2008; Butler and Javitt, 2005; Butler et al., 2003; Silverstein, 2016; Yoon et al., 2010; Uhlhaas et al., 2005; Uhlhaas and Mishara, 2006; Thoenes and Oberfeld, 2017; O'donnell et al., 2002; Notredame et al., 2014). In particular, evidence suggests a deficit in motion perception that might underlie other disruptions in behaviour associated with the disorder (Chen et al., 1999a; Chen et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2004; Chen, 2011; Tadin et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2006; Spencer et al., 2013). For instance, it has been reported that patients exhibit difficulties in discriminating biological motion from non-biological motion (Kim et al., 2005; Okruszek et al., 2015; Spencer et al., 2013) that might underlie some social cognitive impairments (Couture et al., 2006; Fett et al., 2011; Green et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text