Original article
Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: Factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00099-1Get rights and content

Abstract

To assess the generalizability of the population included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registries to the overall United States population, we compared the population of the 198 SEER counties to the population of the 2882 non-SEER counties regarding sociodemographic factors, physician availability, and availability of pertinent hospital resources.

The population residing within the SEER areas is more affluent, has lower unemployment, and is substantially more urban than the remainder of the U.S. population (p < 0.001 for each). The SEER areas have fewer general and family practice physicians, but more total nonfederal physicians, general internists, and specialists relevant to cancer care. SEER areas have fewer Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals accredited hospitals, hospital beds, and hospitals with CT scanners, but more hospitals with bone marrow transplantation.

The differences between the SEER population and the remainder of the United States, especially SEER's higher socioeconomic status and more urban population, should be considered when generalizing from SEER to the entire country.

References (25)

  • Strategies for Managing the Breast Cancer Research Program
  • AB Nattinger et al.

    Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • DC Farrow et al.

    Geographic variation in the treatment of breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • J Samet et al.

    Choice of cancer therapy varies with age of patient

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1986)
  • V Mor et al.

    Relationship between age at diagnosis and treatments received by cancer patients

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1985)
  • S Greenfield et al.

    Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1987)
  • JW Eley et al.

    Racial differences in survival from breast cancer: Results of the National Cancer Institute black/white cancer survival study

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1994)
  • WP McWhorter et al.

    Black/White differences in type of initial breast cancer treatment and implications for survival

    Am J Public Health

    (1987)
  • JS Goodwin et al.

    Determinants of cancer therapy in elderly patients

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • JZ Ayanian et al.

    The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • R Hand et al.

    Hospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patients

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1991)
  • A Lee-Feldstein et al.

    Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival: Delivery systems and medical outcomes

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    Presented in part at the Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting, May, 1995.

    ☆☆

    This article was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01-CA54676) and the Department of the Army. (DAMD 17-94-J-4043).

    View full text