A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8Get rights and content

Abstract

This article introduces a cognitive-behavioral model of Pathological Internet Use (PIU). While previous studies on Internet addiction have described behavioral factors, such as withdrawal and tolerance, the present article focuses on the maladaptive cognitions associated with PIU. The cognitive-behavioral model of PIU distinguishes between specific PIU and generalized PIU. Specific PIU refers to the condition in which an individual pathologically uses the Internet for a particular purpose, such as online sex or online gambling, whereas generalized PIU describes a more global set of behaviors. The model implies a more important role of cognitions in PIU, and describes the means by which PIU is both developed and maintained. Furthermore, it provides a framework for the development of cognitive-behavioral interventions for PIU.

Introduction

Over the past several years, clinicians have reported cases of Internet addiction. Until recently, the associated psychopathology has been loosely described in the literature. Symptoms such as obsessive thoughts about the Internet, tolerance, diminished impulse control, inability to cease using the Internet, and withdrawal have been cited as characterizing unhealthy use of the Internet (Young, 1999). While the term Internet addiction has been used extensively, it seems to be somewhat of a misnomer (Davis, 1999). Addiction, as used in the literature, refers to a physiological dependence between a person and some stimulus, usually a substance. For this reason, the DSM-IV does not use addiction to describe pathological use or abuse of a substance or other such stimulus, nor does it describe compulsive gambling as an addiction. Instead, it favors the terms dependence (for substances) and pathological (for gambling disorders). Therefore, for the remainder of this article, the term Pathological Internet Use (PIU) shall be used to describe the set of symptoms previously mentioned in the literature.

As a result of the rapid proliferation of the Internet, and the popularization of PIU as a cultural phenomenon, it has become commonplace to use (and perhaps abuse) the term PIU. To be clear, PIU is a distinct pattern of behavior among a specific subgroup of our population. However, the numbers for such behavior have been greatly exaggerated by the both the media and psychologists using unreliable and invalid research methods (Grohol, 1999). To distinguish between ‘real’ cases of Internet dependence, and those that are simply artifacts of questionable experimental design, this article defines two distinct types of PIU: specific and generalized Specific pathological Internet use includes those people that are dependent on a specific function of the Internet. Clinical and media accounts of this include overuse (abuse) of online sexual material/services, online auction services, online stock trading, and online gambling. It seems reasonable to assume that these dependencies are content-specific, and that they would exist in the absence of the Internet. Specific PIU is related to only one aspect of the Internet, and exists entirely independent of multiple Internet functions. Generalized pathological Internet use involves a general, multidimensional overuse of the Internet. It might also include wasting time online, without a clear objective. Often, generalized PIU can be associated with the ‘chat’ found online and dependence on e-mail. This is assumed to be related to the social aspect of the Internet. The need for social contact and reinforcement obtained online results in an increased desire to remain in a virtual social life. The etiology and implications of such a relationship will be discussed later in this article in terms of a cognitive-behavioral model of PIU.

In a convincing descriptive model of PIU, Pratarelli, Browne, and Johnson (1999) described a four-factor model of PIU psychopathology. Factor one focused on the dysfunctional behaviors associated with overuse of the Internet, as outlined by several problematic behavioral styles. Factor two described the functional use of the Internet, which includes using the Internet in a meaningful and productive way. Factor three focused on using the Internet for sexual gratification and/or social gains. This describes the shy or introverted user who relies on the Internet to express his/her fantasies. Finally, factor four describes those individuals who are either disinterested in the Internet or mildly averted to the technology. They demonstrate little or no dependence on the internet (Pratarelli et al., 1999). This model attempts to describe four levels of Internet users. Therefore, for any given user, we can assign a category of Internet usage. While this model is helpful in describing the prevalence and incidence of Internet usage, it does not address the etiology of PIU.

In identifying the etiology of PIU, a cognitive-behavioral approach is employed. This model posits that PIU results from problematic cognitions coupled with behaviors that either intensify or maintain the maladaptive response. This theory of PIU is a departure from the other theories in that it emphasizes the individual’s cognitions (or thoughts) as the main source of abnormal behavior. Whereas the most prominent symptoms of PIU had generally been considered to be the affective or behavioral symptoms, this article stipulates that cognitive symptoms of PIU may often precede and cause the affective or behavioral symptoms rather than vice versa. Therefore, while previous research has focused on the behavioral components (Young, 1996) and negative consequences in daily life (Davis, Smith, Rodrigue, & Pulvers, 1999), this article focuses on the maladaptive cognitions associated with PIU. Cognitive theories of depression are based on similar assumptions (Beck, 1976). Cognitive symptoms include a ruminative cognitive style, feelings of self-consciousness, low self-worth, a depressogenic cognitive style, low self-esteem, and social anxiety. The model outlined in this article attempts to describe both the developmental nature of PIU, and explain how it is maintained.

In order to explain the nature of the cognitive theory of PIU, it is necessary to describe some preliminary concepts. Firstly, Abramson, Metalsky, and Alloy (1989) distinguish between the concepts of necessary, sufficient, and contributory causes of symptoms. A necessary cause is an etiological factor that must be present or must have occurred in order for the symptoms to occur. In terms of formal logic, etiological factor (E) is necessary for the occurrence of set of symptoms (S). Note, however, that the symptoms are not required to occur when the necessary cause is present or has occurred (i.e. necessary but not sufficient). A sufficient cause is an etiological factor whose presence or occurrence guarantees the occurrence of the symptoms. Therefore, E is sufficient for the occurrence of S. A contributory cause is an etiological factor that increases the likelihood of the occurrence of the set of symptoms, but that is neither necessary nor sufficient for their occurrence. In other words, E contributes to the occurrence of S. Finally, Abramson et al. (1989) distinguish between proximal and distal causes. In the etiological chain that results in a set of symptoms, some causes lie toward the end of the chain (proximal) and others lie near the beginning of the chain, distant from the set of symptoms (distal; Abramson et al., 1989).

This concept can be explained by considering the development of anxiety symptoms, including rapid heart rate, perspiring, dryness of the mouth, etc. Proximal causes for these symptoms are obvious, such as stress, danger, or an otherwise fear-inducing situation. More distal causes might be lack of sleep, cardiac arrhythmia, drug-induced paranoia, and so on. Distal causes are those that are somewhat removed from the symptoms, in terms of etiological proximity, although significant to the development of symptoms nonetheless. So, lack of sleep might be a distal contributory cause of anxiety symptoms, in that it contributes to the development of symptoms yet it is not enough by itself to cause symptoms, nor is it closely linked to anxiety symptoms in terms of etiology. Conversely, life-threatening danger is a proximal sufficient cause for anxiety symptoms. It is enough in itself to produce anxiety and is closely linked to the physical manifestation of autonomic arousal and hence anxiety.

The goal of the current article is to introduce maladaptive cognitions (i.e. distorted thoughts and thought processes) as a proximal sufficient cause of the set of symptoms of PIU.

The nature of distal contributory causes of PIU shall be explained within a diathesis-stress framework. According to this framework, abnormal behavior is the result of a predisposed vulnerability (diathesis) and a life event (stress). In the proposed cognitive-behavioral model of PIU, existing psychopathology is the diathesis. Several studies have implicated underlying psychopathology in overuse of the Internet, including depression, social anxiety, and substance dependence (Kraut et al., 1998). Although methodological problems have hindered the power of these studies (Rierdan, 1999), a relationship between these psychological disorders appears to exist. The cognitive-behavioral model for PIU (Fig. 1) suggests that psychopathology is a distal necessary cause of symptoms of PIU. That is, psychopathology must be present or must have occurred in order for the symptoms of PIU to occur. Note however, that underlying psychopathology does not in itself result in symptoms of PIU, but are a necessary element in its etiology. The presence of an underlying psychopathology would seem to negate the very existence of PIU altogether. If an individual is depressed, but shows symptoms of PIU, shouldn’t treatment focus on the depression and not PIU? However, it is the assumption of this model that although basic psychopathology might render an individual vulnerable to PIU, the set of associated symptoms is specific to PIU and thus should be investigated independently. What may start out as one thing leads to something else that is altogether different. More about this will be discussed later in this article.

The stressor in this model is the introduction of the Internet or some new technology found on the Internet. While it might be difficult to actually trace back an individual’s first experience with the Internet, a more empirically testable event is the experience of a new technology found on the Internet. This might be the first time an individual locates pornography on the Internet, the first time on an online auction service, an online stock trading service, or a chat service. The exposure to such technologies is a distal necessary cause of symptoms of PIU. In itself, the experience of these technologies does not mitigate symptoms, however as a contributory factor, the event is a catalyst for the developmental process of PIU.

A key factor in the experience of the Internet and associated new technologies is the reinforcement an individual receives from the event. When an individual initially tries a new Internet feature, he or she is reinforced by the ensuing response. If the response is positive, the individual is reinforced to continue the activity. The individual is then conditioned to perform the activity more often to achieve the same response as the one associated with the initial event. This operant conditioning continues until the individual invariably seeks out new technologies to achieve a similar physiological reaction. It is also the assumption of this model that an associative shift occurs in the normal process of conditioning. According to basic operant conditioning principles, any stimulus associated with the primary conditioned stimulus is susceptible to secondary reinforcement. Therefore, the current model of PIU suggests that stimuli such as the sound of a computer connecting with an online service, the tactile sensation of typing on a keyboard, and even the odor of one’s office or primary place of using the Internet can result in a conditioned response. The model suggested in this article suggests that secondary reinforcers act as situational cues that reinforce the development of PIU symptoms and contribute to the maintenance of associated symptoms.

Perhaps the most central factor of the cognitive-behavioral model of PIU is the presence of maladaptive cognitions. An individual with PIU presents fundamental cognitive dysfunction in the form of specific maladaptive cognitions. These cognitions are proximal sufficient causes of PIU, in that they are sufficient to cause the set of symptoms associated with PIU. Maladaptive cognitions can be broken down into two main subtypes: thoughts about the self, and thoughts about the world. Thoughts about the self are guided by a ruminative cognitive style. Individuals who tend to ruminate will experience more severe and prolonged PIU. Rumination involves constantly thinking about problems associated with the individual’s Internet use, rather than being able to be distracted by other events in one’s life. Rumination includes responses such as constantly trying to figure out why one is overusing the Internet, reading about PIU, or talking to one’s friends about overusing the Internet. Several researchers claim that rumination is likely to maintain or exacerbate psychopathology, in part by interfering with instrumental behavior (i.e. taking action), and engaging in effective interpersonal problem solving (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991). Furthermore, self-focused rumination leads an individual to recall more reinforced memories about the Internet, thus maintaining the vicious cycle of PIU.

Other cognitive distortions about the self include self-doubt, low self-efficacy and negative self-appraisal. The individual has a negative view of his or herself and uses the Internet to achieve more positive responses from others in a non-threatening way. Cognitions about the self may include such thoughts as, “I am only good on the Internet,” “I am worthless offline, but online I am someone,” and “I am a failure when I am offline.”

Cognitive distortions about the world involve generalizing specific events to global trends. In other words, the individual might think, “The Internet is the only place I am respected,” “Nobody loves me offline,” “the Internet is my only friend,” or “People treat me badly offline.” This all-or-nothing thinking is considered a maladaptive cognitive distortion that exacerbates the individual’s Internet dependence.

These distortions of thought are automatically enacted whenever a stimulus associated with the Internet is available. Therefore, immediately upon entering a chatroom, the individual automatically (and unintentionally) enacts these cognitions. The result of such maladaptive cognitions is either specific PIU or generalized PIU.

Specific PIU involves overuse and abuse of specific Internet functions. These might be online auction houses, online pornography, online stock trading services, etc. Specific PIU is assumed to be the result of pre-existing psychopathology, which becomes associated with online activity. Therefore, the individual that might otherwise be a compulsive gambler would effectively realize that gambling is available online and eventually demonstrate specific PIU. A similar scenario might occur with the individual who compulsively (and pathologically) uses pornography. This individual comes to realize the vast amounts of pornography material online, and eventually comes to overuse the Internet. This would be termed specific PIU. Several studies have implicated online sexual compulsivity as a major predictor of PIU (Cooper, Putnam, Planchon, & Boies, 1999). This supports the cognitive-behavioral model of PIU, in that pornography is an immediate stimulus-response condition. Internet users are able to immediately locate pornography online, and get immediate reinforcement from it. This behavioral association becomes strong, and the need for more explicit materials becomes stronger. As a result, the individual demonstrates symptoms of specific PIU. However, it is important to note that not every compulsive gambler or pornography abuser shows symptoms of specific PIU. What separates the individuals who become specific pathological users of the Internet is proscribed in the cognitive-behavioral model as described in this article.

Of considerable difference is the more generalized user of the Internet. One element that contributes to the causal pathway of generalized PIU is related to the social context of the individual. Specifically, a lack of social support from family or friends and/or social isolation will result in generalized PIU. Generalized PIU involves spending abnormal amounts of time on the Internet, either wasting time with no directive purpose, or spending vast amounts of time in chat rooms. These individuals may check their e-mail several times a day and/or spend much of the day replying to bulletin boards and listservs. Procrastination plays a significant role in both the development and maintenance of generalized PIU. Individuals with generalized PIU use the Internet to put off their responsibilities. This wasted time results in significant problems with daily functioning, as responsibilities get put off and pressures increase.

Individuals with general PIU are considerably more problematic in that their pathology would likely not even exist in the absence of the Internet. Although they likely had some previous psychopathology, were prone to maladaptive cognitions, and were socially isolated, they had no way of expressing their angst. The Internet, in its social role, acts as a means of communication to the most extreme degree imaginable. It is the individual’s lifeline to the outer world.

Symptoms of PIU are similar to those set out in previous research (Young, 1996), although in the cognitive-behavioral model the emphasis is on the cognitive symptoms. As such, the symptoms are obsessive thoughts about the Internet, diminished impulse control, inability to cease Internet usage, and importantly, feeling that the Internet is an individual’s only friend. The person feels as thought the Internet is the only place where they feel good about themselves and the world around them. Other symptoms of PIU include thinking about the Internet while offline, anticipating future time online, and spending large of amounts of money on Internet time and other such expenses. An individual with PIU spends less time doing otherwise pleasurable activities than before the PIU began. What used to be fun for them is no longer enjoyable. A further complication arises when the person eventually isolates himself or herself from friends, in favor of friends online. This problematic behavior maintains the vicious cycle of PIU, in that the individual becomes socially isolated. Finally, individuals with PIU have a sense of guilt about their online use. They often lie to their friends about how much time they spend online, and consider their Internet use a secret to others. While they understand that what they are doing is not entirely socially acceptable, they cannot stop. This results in a diminished self worth and further symptoms of PIU.

While several articles in the literature have discussed pathological use of the Internet, there has been little talk of healthy Internet use. Is there such a thing? Of course! Millions of people around the world use the Internet to find information, communicate with friends, work, play, and otherwise function well on this new medium. The Internet should not be viewed as a negative resource, nor should it be vilified. On the contrary, the Internet is an exciting new medium that is constantly evolving into an essential part of daily living. However, we must be aware of the negative consequences of overuse of the Internet, and understand the behavior of people who use it in a pathological way.

What, then, is healthy Internet use? Healthy Internet refers to using the Internet for an expressed purpose in a reasonable amount of time without cognitive or behavioral discomfort. Healthy Internet users can separate Internet communication with real life communication. They employ the Internet as a helpful tool rather than a source of identity. There is no specific time limit, nor is there any behavioral benchmark. Where then do we draw the line between healthy Internet use and pathological Internet use? The current model posits a continuum of functioning, with healthy Internet use on one side and unhealthy use on the other. There is no common threshold of behavior or even cognitive functioning. Instead, it is the individual that determines the degree to which he or she is using the Internet in an adaptive or maladaptive manner.

Section snippets

Conclusions

While previous literature has focused on the behavior associated with PIU, this article stresses the cognitive component. Clearly, cognitions play a role in both development and maintenance of PIU. A vicious cycle of cognitive distortions and reinforcement facilitates symptoms of PIU, and the negative behaviors associated with spending too much time online. It is the assertion of this article that more attention should be paid to maladaptive cognitions in PIU, as this may be the focus of our

References (11)

  • L.Y. Abramson et al.

    Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression

    Psychological Review

    (1989)
  • A.T. Beck

    Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders

    (1976)
  • A. Cooper et al.

    Online sexual compulsivity: getting tangled in the net

    Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity

    (1999)
  • Davis, R. A. (1999). Internet addiction: is it real? Catalyst. Available at:...
  • S.F. Davis et al.

    An examination of Internet usage in two college campuses

    College Student Journal

    (1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (1833)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text