Elsevier

Clinical Biomechanics

Volume 18, Issue 8, October 2003, Pages 760-764
Clinical Biomechanics

Mechanical properties of nasal fascia and periosteum

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00136-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. To determine under which layer the silicone implants should be inserted into, the biomechanical properties of fascia and periosteum were investigated.

Design. Biomechanical testing of cadaveric tissues.

Background. In silicone augmentation rhinoplasty, most complications are closely related to the depth of implant and the mechanical character of the tissue surrounding the implant.

Methods. Biomechanical properties of human nasal periosteum and fascia were studied, including tensile strength, stress–strain relationship and stress relaxation under uniaxial elongation.

Result. Although with less failure strain, the periosteum has more tensile strength than fascia. The slope of the linear part of stress–strain curve of the periosteum is bigger than that of fascia, which indicates the periosteum is stiffer than fascia. The stress-relaxation slope of periosteum is smaller than that of fascia.

Conclusion. In the view of biomechanics, the periosteum is thicker, stronger and stiffer than fascia. Under periosteum the silicone implants are easier to be fixed at desired position, thus periosteum is more suitable for covering silicone implants.
Relevance

The periosteum is more suitable than fascia for covering silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty.

Introduction

With the rapid development of aesthetic plastic surgery, augmentation rhinoplasty has become one of the most popular plastic surgery procedures in China. Silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty is used to correct congenital saddle-nose and flat nose (Rozner et al., 1980; Lovice et al., 1999; Deva et al., 1998). The increasing number of patients requesting this operation is linked with improvement of technique and more demand on beauty. It is frequent to see patients asking for correction of minor defects. The operation is simple and makes people look better, more beautiful, and more vibrant (Ercolani and Baldaro, 1999). But the results of our follow-up indicate that many problems in rhinoplasty stem not only from the technique of the surgeon but also from the layer that silicone implants was inserted into.

According to our clinical experience, silicone implants can be inserted into one of three anatomical layers of the nasal dorsum: subcutaneous, subperiosteal or subfascial (Lovice et al., 1999; Deva et al., 1998) (Fig. 1). Many postoperative complications, such as drifting of the plastic frame, step-like deformity at the nasal bridge, maldirected silicone implants, changing in skin color, abnormal sensation and the silicone implants protruding through nasal skin, occur when the silicone implants are inserted into subcutaneous or subfascial shallow layers (classical rhinoplasty). According to our clinic experience, these complications can be greatly reduced if the silicone implants are implanted deeper. But the mechanism is not clear. Therefore the biomechanical properties of human nasal periosteum and fascia, including their tensile strength, stress–strain relationship and stress-relaxation characters under uniaxial elongation were investigated.

Section snippets

Methods

Periosteum and fascia were removed from 15 adult cadavers (aged from 17 to 49) within 48 h postmortem. Periosteum and fascia were separated, placed on microscopic slides (Mutou et al., 1975), covered with saline moistened gauze and stored in refrigerator at 4 °C before experiment. Their width and thickness were measured with optic magnifying scale. Mechanical test was performed with a hydraulically powered uniaxial elongation machine, (Instron Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) under room

Tensile strength

Table 1 gives the comparison of tensile strength (engineering stress) and failure strain (engineering strain) of the periosteum and fascia, The tensile strength of the periosteum is greater than that of the fascia, but the failure strain is much less. Although having bigger tensile strength, periosteum has less deformation under failure strain so they are less extensible than fascia. This explains why it is so easy to lacerate the periosteum when it is separated to insert silicone implants.

Stress–strain relationship

The

Discussion

According to our clinical investigation, the site of implantation plays an important role in the success of rhinoplasty. Our research on biomechanical properties of human nasal periosteum and fascia provides strong evidence that periosteum is less extensible than fascia and has less stress relaxation, thus more suitable for implant fixation. In clinical practice, the silicone implant are sculptured into the shape of part of the nose before it is implanted. In an additional experiment, we have

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Chinese National Nature Science Foundation.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Electrospun and 3D printed polymeric materials for one-stage critical-size long bone defect regeneration inspired by the Masquelet technique: Recent Advances

    2022, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similar to other characterisation methods, membranes’ mechanical properties (mainly, tensile properties) have been mainly performed with PCL. In these studies, tensile strengths of PCL-based electrospun materials ranged from 1 MPa in Owston et al. [6] to 4.6–11.2 MPa in Zhou et al. [24] all within the range of natural periosteum (Zeng et al. [32]). Young's modulus is a measure how a material can withstand changes in length when under lengthwise tension.

  • Core-sheath micro/nano fiber membrane with antibacterial and osteogenic dual functions as biomimetic artificial periosteum for bone regeneration applications

    2019, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The stress–strain curves in Figure 2, B show that the membranes were stretchable, a significant property for the artificial periosteum to bear the stress during the surgical operation and physiological process. PGMI and PGM possessed the tensile strength of more than 1 MPa, which is comparable with natural periosteum,44 as demonstrated in Table S2. As shown in Figure 2, C, all the core-sheath fiber membranes indicated excellent hydrophilicity with contact angles of 10°-60°.

  • Structural interaction between bone and implants due to arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint

    2019, Foot and Ankle Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Maximum principal stresses obtained for cortical bones with Tornier implant showed a value of 18.12 MPa, this value is below the value reported by Shin et al. [24] for this tissue (175 MPa), this means that cortical bone is not damage. However, this value according to Zeng et al. [29] may damage the periosteum. On the other hand, some strains values showed in Table 3 for Swanson and Tornier models are above the values reported by Trabersi et al. [30] for microcracks.

  • Icariin-loaded electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofiber membrane as potential artificial periosteum

    2018, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
    Citation Excerpt :

    The stress-strain curves in Fig. 2d show that the membranes are stretchable, which is crucial for an artificial periosteum. As shown in Table S1, the tensile strength of all the membranes were in the range of 10–14 MPa, which is higher than natural periosteum (3–4 MPa) [37] and we are confident that this meets the clinical requirements. Hydrophilicity of biomaterials is an important characteristic to control, especially when they interact directly with cells.

  • Viscoelastic behavior of human fasciae under extension in manual therapy

    2007, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
    Citation Excerpt :

    The mechanical properties of ex vivo rat superficial fascia (subcutaneous tissue) under uniaxial tension have recently been investigated due to its potential importance in a variety of therapies involving mechanical stretch (Iatridis et al., 2003). The mechanical properties of in vitro human superficial nasal fascia and nasal periosteum were investigated by Zeng et al. (2003) to determine under which layer silicon implants should be inserted for better results of esthetic plastic surgery to correct congenital saddle-nose and flat nose. Similarly the mechanical properties of in vitro and in vivo properties of plantar fascia and fascia lata have also been investigated by Wright and Rennels (1964).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text