Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 378, Issue 9799, 8–14 October 2011, Pages 1339-1353
The Lancet

Series
Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60889-1Get rights and content

Summary

This report is the second in a Series on early child development in low-income and middle-income countries and assesses the effectiveness of early child development interventions, such as parenting support and preschool enrolment. The evidence reviewed suggests that early child development can be improved through these interventions, with effects greater for programmes of higher quality and for the most vulnerable children. Other promising interventions for the promotion of early child development include children's educational media, interventions with children at high risk, and combining the promotion of early child development with conditional cash transfer programmes. Effective investments in early child development have the potential to reduce inequalities perpetuated by poverty, poor nutrition, and restricted learning opportunities. A simulation model of the potential long-term economic effects of increasing preschool enrolment to 25% or 50% in every low-income and middle-income country showed a benefit-to-cost ratio ranging from 6·4 to 17·6, depending on preschool enrolment rate and discount rate.

Introduction

This report, the second in a Series, assesses the effectiveness of early child development intervention programmes in low-income and middle-income countries, calculates the cost of not investing in early child development, and builds on the 2007 Series in The Lancet on child development.1, 2, 3 The first report4 of the present Series identified social–cultural, psychosocial, and biological risk and protective factors that affect child development. The theoretical framework used in both reports, presented in the first figure of the first report, illustrates how children's developmental trajectories are affected by biological systems and by positive and negative risk and protective factors. The intensity of these effects relates to the developmental periods in which the risk factors happen (timing), the dose or extent of the risks (exposure), and the child's individual reactivity (temperament) to the risk and protective factors. Effective programmes, policies, and other interventions can protect children from the negative consequences of living in poverty.

Section snippets

Inequalities between and within countries

Social and economic differences, both between and within countries, contribute to inequalities in children's development. The WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, in a World Health Assembly report,5 highlighted the social injustice of “avoidable health inequalities” and concluded that social and economic policies addressing early child development can affect whether children develop to their potential or experience a constrained life-course trajectory. Not only are there major

The challenge of sustainable improvement

Despite evidence of the potential effectiveness of interventions in early childhood, policy makers and planners are challenged by designing interventions that sustainably improve early child development at scale.9 In our previous review3 we reported that 18 of 20 early child development programmes in low-income and middle-income countries substantially affected early child development, with the largest effects in comprehensive programmes. Other recent reviews,10, 11 which included high-income

Promising directions for programming

Since poverty is a root cause of poor child development, some approaches to improving early child development are aimed at making those improvements through poverty alleviation. Cash transfer programmes are a popular approach to long-term poverty alleviation;55, 56 the expectation of conditional cash transfer programmes is that families use cash transfers both to help parents provide for their children's needs and as an incentive for parents to invest in their children's health and education.57

Children at risk of not reaching their potential

Substantial numbers of children experience risks to their development, in addition to poverty and malnutrition. These risks include physical and developmental disabilities, severe acute malnutrition, being small for gestational age and low birthweight (LBW), and being infected with HIV/AIDS (webappendix pp 18–20).

Programmatic implications

Most effectiveness studies that we have reviewed reported substantial and positive effects on child development, but results from assessments of scaled-up programmes were more variable. In panel 3 we list our conclusions and recommendations for the scale-up of early child development programmes. The Wolfensohn Center at Brookings Institution assessed issues in taking early child development to scale from 2005 to 2011.23, 90, 91 Expanding coverage while maintaining quality is a major issue for

Estimating potential benefits of preschool

Preschool is only one component of a comprehensive early child development agenda, but can serve as a proxy in an analysis of potential economic benefits of increasing investments. We estimated the effect of preschool enrolment on the gap between schooling attainment of the wealthiest quintile of youth (aged 15–19 years) compared with youth in the other wealth quintiles for 73 low-income and middle-income countries with a total population of 2·69 billion people (panel 4).98 Our estimates show

Trends in policies and funding

In the 2007 Series, there was a call for expanded early child development programmes, policies, and coordinating mechanisms at the national level. According to UNICEF annual reports, more than 40 countries are developing or have developed and received parliamentary approval for early child development policies, and several UN bodies have publicly supported early child development. WHO's Commission on the Social Determinants of Health made child development one of its key focus areas,5 the

Conclusions and future work

We have presented evidence for factors contributing to the effectiveness of interventions to promote early child development in low-income and middle-income countries (panel 2), recommendations for how programmes and policies can support early child development (panel 3), and we pose several future research questions (panel 6). The review from the previous Series3 reported that the most effective early child development programmes are those that provide direct learning experiences for children

Search strategy and selection criteria

In our systematic review, we searched databases including Psychinfo, PubMed, Google Scholar, Global Health, Econ Lit, ISI Web of Science, Academic Search Elite, the World Bank website, the UNICEF Evaluation Database, and the Brookings Institution website, and we used personal contacts to identify unpublished work in both English and Spanish. Our primary search was done between September, 2009, and December, 2010, and we limited our search to papers that had been published since July, 2006, when

References (106)

  • A Opel et al.

    The effect of preschool dialogic reading on vocabulary among rural Bangladeshi children

    Int J Educ Res

    (2009)
  • A Rolla San Francisco et al.

    Evaluating the impact of different early literacy interventions on low-income Costa Rican kindergarteners

    Int J Educ Res

    (2006)
  • S Berlinski et al.

    The effect of pre-primary education on primary school performance

    J Public Econ

    (2009)
  • LCH Fernald et al.

    10-year effect of Oportunidades, Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme, on child growth, cognition, language, and behaviour: a longitudinal follow-up study

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • LCH Fernald et al.

    Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: an analysis of Mexico's Oportunidades

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • LCH Fernald et al.

    Ecuador's cash transfer program (Bono de Desarollo Humnano) and child development in infants and toddlers: a randomized effectiveness trial

    Soc Sci Med

    (2011)
  • N Baydar et al.

    Effects of an educational television program on preschoolers: variability in benefits

    J Appl Dev Psychol

    (2008)
  • H McConachie et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of alternative modes of service provision to young children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh

    J Pediatr

    (2000)
  • SP Walker et al.

    Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development

    Lancet

    (2011)
  • Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health—final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health

    (2008)
  • E Vegas et al.

    The promise of early child development in Latin America and the Caribbean

    (2010)
  • LM Dunn et al.

    Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test): Adaptación Hispanoamericana (Hispanic-American Adaptation)

    (1986)
  • S Cueto et al.

    Psychometric characteristics of cognitive development and achievement instruments in Round 2 of Young Lives—Technical Note 15

    (2009)
  • PK Maulik et al.

    Community-based interventions to optimize early childhood development in low resource settings

    J Perinatol

    (2009)
  • Effective public health practice project: quality assessment tool for quantitative studies

  • DB Yarbrough et al.

    The program evaluation standards: a guide for evaluators and evaluation users

    (2011)
  • FE Aboud et al.

    A cluster-randomized evaluation of a responsive stimulation and feeding intervention in Bangladesh

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
  • ME Bentley et al.

    A home-based educational intervention to caregivers in south India to improve complementary feeding and responsive feeding, and psychosocial stimulation increases dietary intake, growth and development of infants

    FASEB J

    (2010)
  • PJ Cooper et al.

    Improving quality of mother-infant relationship and infant attachment in socioeconomically deprived community in South Africa: randomised controlled trial

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • PS Klein et al.

    Interaction-oriented early intervention in Ethiopia: the MISC approach

    Infants and Young Children

    (2004)
  • X Jin et al.

    “Care for Development” intervention in rural China: a prospective follow-up study

    J Dev Behav Pediatr

    (2007)
  • C Leung et al.

    An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong

    Fam Process

    (2003)
  • IO Ertem et al.

    Promoting child development at sick-child visits: a controlled trial

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • W Janssens et al.

    The impact of a home-visiting Early Childhood intervention in the Caribbean on cognitive and socio-emotional child development

    (2011)
  • A Tinajero

    Scaling-up early child development in Cuba—Cuba's Educate Your Child Program: strategies and lessons from the expansion process

    (2010)
  • S Al-Hassan et al.

    Evaluation of the Better Parenting Program in Jordan

    Early Child Dev Care

    (2011)
  • H Palti et al.

    A community-orientated early intervention programme integrated in a primary preventive child health service—evaluation of activities and effectiveness

    Community Med

    (1982)
  • PL Engle et al.

    Care for development in three central Asian countries: report of process evaluation in Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan

  • A Nodira et al.

    Impact Assessment Family Education Project

    (2009)
  • L Sidibeh

    Evaluation of the parental education programme at LRR, CRR & URR, The Gambia

  • RH Bradley et al.

    Caring for children around the world: a view from HOME

    Int J Behav Dev

    (2005)
  • S Walker

    Promoting equity through early child development interventions for children from birth through three years of age

  • Documents on integrated management of childhood illness listed by year of publication

    (2010)
  • C Nowak et al.

    A comprehensive meta-analysis of triple P-positive parenting program using hierarchical linear modeling: effectiveness and moderating variables

    Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev

    (2008)
  • P Moran et al.

    The effectiveness of parenting support

    Children and Society

    (2005)
  • J Korfmacher et al.

    The helping relationship and program participation in early childhood home visiting

    Infant Ment Health J

    (2007)
  • MJ Bakermans-Kranenburg et al.

    Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood

    Psychol Bull

    (2003)
  • D Paul et al.

    Report of the pre-test study: Mother and Child Protection Card

    (2005)
  • FE Aboud et al.

    The Succeed Project: challenging early school failure in Bangladesh

    Rese Comp Int Educ

    (2008)
  • PAM Mwaura et al.

    Evaluating the Madrasa preschool programme in east Africa: a quasi-experimental study

    Int J Early Years Educ

    (2008)
  • Cited by (604)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text