Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 359, Issue 9304, 2 February 2002, Pages 435-438
The Lancet

Fast Track — Public Health
GAVI, the first steps: lessons for the Global Fund

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07607-9Get rights and content

Summary

The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) is seen as a model for the new Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, to be launched early in 2002. We did an assessment in four African countries to report the experiences of ministries of health and their partners in applying to GAVI for funds to strengthen health systems and for new vaccines. Countries welcomed the introduction of hepatitis B vaccine, safe injection equipment, and the financial support to strengthen immunisation programmes. All reported that the pace of the application process was too rapid. District visits revealed low staffing levels, insufficient transport and fuel, poorly functioning cold chains, and infrequent supervision. Information systems were unreliable, which will be an obstacle to GAVI when monitoring and rewarding improvements in immunisation coverage. Also, the high cost of expensive new vaccines will be difficult to sustain if GAVI funding stops at the end of its 5 year commitment. Our study suggests that applications for support and planning for AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria control under the new Global Fund, will be more complex and demanding on already overstretched ministries of health. Further, the rapid onset of activities, coupled with uncertainty about the time-scale of donor commitment, could be problematic. A limited and carefully assessed set of initial activities, focusing on where and how to strengthen existing country systems, is more likely to be successful and could provide useful models for scaling-up to larger programmes in different contexts.

Section snippets

Study approaches

Four sub-Saharan African countries were selected for the field-work, carried out between April and September, 2001. Three (Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania) were among the first successful applicants and were already in receipt of GAVI support, and one (Lesotho) had been unsuccessful in its initial application. Interviews were done with senior ministry of health (MoH), and bilateral and multilateral agency staff who were GAVI partners or had participated in the preparation of country

Lessons, new and old

The GAVI initiative has developed at a remarkable pace, with new funds reaching countries within 12 months of its launch and less than 6 months after countries submitted applications. Our study raises some important questions on the country-wide impact for both GAVI and for the Global Fund of this new type of global public-private partnership. Some issues are new, such as a supply-driven process affecting decisions on the introduction of expensive and potentially unsustainable new commodities,

Lessons for the Global Fund

The Global Fund's Transitional Working Group has produced a set of discussion and summary papers to be adopted as the framework document at the first meeting of the Global Fund Board at the end of January, 2002.8 In the summary discussions on guidelines for proposals, a factor determining a country's readiness for funding includes “implementation capacity, including micro-planning, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, and staffing systems to operate and scale up proven district and

References (9)

  • WaltG et al.

    Partnership and fragmentation in international health: threat or opportunity?

    Trop Med Int Health

    (2000)
  • CuttsF

    Vaccination in the 21st century—new funds, new strategies?

    Trop Med Int Health

    (2000)
  • 1Update on country-level GAVI and vaccine fund related activities

    (2002)
  • Immunisation Data Quality Audit Evaluation Report. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Emerging Markets, Euro Health Group, Liverpool Associates in Tropical Health (LATH)

    (October, 2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (87)

  • Global Health Partnerships and Translation

    2021, Handbook of Global Health: With 362 Figures and 152 Tables
  • Philanthropic foundations in international development: Rockefeller, ford, and gates

    2021, Philanthropic Foundations in International Development: Rockefeller, Ford and Gates
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text