Recovery from aphasia following brain injury: the role of reorganization
Introduction
It is commonly accepted that language is predominantly a left hemisphere function, yet patients with extensive damage to the left hemisphere are often able to recover, at least somewhat, over the days to weeks to even years following their injury. Reorganization of structure/function of the nervous system in which an undamaged part of the brain takes over the function of the damaged portion has long been assumed to be a crucial component of the recovery process. In this chapter we review the evidence for such reorganization, the role it plays in the recovery of language following brain damage, and how knowledge of mechanisms of recovery can lead to more effective methods of rehabilitation.
To orient readers outside of the specialty of aphasiology, we should note that different areas of brain damage (or dysfunction) generally lead to different language disorders. While localization of language function is complex and controversial, a few widely agreed upon generalizations can be stated. Damage or dysfunction of the left posterior inferior frontal cortex (Broca's area) generally leads to impaired programming or planning of speech articulation, agrammatic speech, and difficulty in processing morphosyntactic processes for comprehension of syntactically complex sentences. Dysfunction of left temporal or parietal areas can disrupt representations of the meanings of words, and dysfunction of left posterior, superior temporal gyrus (Wernicke's area) disrupts the linkage between words and their meanings.
Section snippets
How does reorganization fit into recovery?
We have proposed that recovery of language after stroke occurs in three overlapping phases, each with a unique set of underlying neural mechanisms (Hillis and Breese, 2003; Hillis, 2005a). Acute recovery, which is primarily due to restoration of tissue function, occurs in the hours to days following brain damage. Subacute recovery, which is primarily due to neural reorganization, is a longer and more complex process. It follows the acute phase and lasts for several weeks to months during which
Evidence for reorganization in aphasia
We have known for over a century that, in normal, healthy individuals, language is predominantly represented in the left hemisphere (Broca, 1865). Bilateral activation during verb generation in normal individuals undergoing functional MRI (fMRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) indicates that it is not uncommon for the right hemisphere to also become engaged during language tasks (Demonet et al., 1992; Weiller et al., 1995; Noppeney et al., 2005). However, the left hemisphere is dominant
The location of reorganization — evidence from functional imaging
While it is clear that reorganization occurs, allowing at least partial recovery of language following injury, the areas that are responsible for assuming the lost function remain controversial. When fMRI and PET imaging became available, there was hope within the community that these techniques would reveal with certainty the areas that assume the language function for each damaged region of the brain. Unfortunately, results of numerous subsequent studies appear somewhat conflicting.
Many
Factors affecting the location and extent of reorganization
Many factors may influence the anatomical location where language processing occurs after damage to the left hemisphere. It is therefore difficult to predict the exact locations in the brain that will be essential for recovery in an individual patient. Several important factors will be discussed below.
Rehabilitation
The role of cognitive rehabilitation in stimulating reorganization of brain/language relationships is controversial. By better understanding what occurs in the brain during reorganization, we will undoubtedly be better able to design rehabilitation programs that facilitate the process. Many of the techniques currently employed by speech language pathologists and other clinicians focus on treatment of the damaged component of the system, while others focus on increasing the utilization of spared
Unanswered questions and areas of future research
It is currently an exciting era in the field of neurology. By better understanding the ways in which the brain recovers and is able to reorganize following injury, it is possible to begin designing better methods of treatment for our patients. There is accumulating evidence that rehabilitation can be effectively augmented with medications that increase synaptic plasticity. Nevertheless, many questions remain. There is a need for identification of all the factors that influence when and where in
References (97)
- et al.
Quantitative fMRI assessment of the differences in lateralization of language-related brain activation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy
Neuroimage
(2003) - et al.
The role of the right hemisphere in recovery from aphasia. Two case studies
Cortex
(1989) - et al.
Word retrieval learning modulates right frontal cortex in patients with left frontal damage
Neuron
(2002) - et al.
A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics
Brain and Language
(1997) - et al.
Depressive symptoms and history of depression predict rehabilitation efficiency in stroke patients
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab
(2001) Effects of amphetamines and small related molecules on recovery after stroke in animals and man
Neuropharmacology
(2000)- et al.
Bromocriptine treatment of nonfluent aphasia
Arch. Phys Med Rehab
(1992) - et al.
Speech-induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia
J. Neurol. Sci.
(1997) - et al.
Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke
Prog. Brain Res.
(1987) - et al.
Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: what is the contribution of the right hemisphere?
Brain and Lang
(1998)
Computer tomographic localization, lesion size and prognosis in aphasia and nonverbal impairment
Brain Lang
How atypical is atypical language dominance?
Neuroimage
Role of adrenal stress hormones in forming lasting memories in the brain
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open protocol study
Brain Lang
An fMRI study of word retrieval in aphasia
Brain and Lang.
Cognitive neuropsychological analysis and neuroanatomical correlates in a case of acute anomia
Brain Lang
Different neural circuits subserve reading before and after therapy for acquired dyslexia
Brain Lang
Use of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of aphasia
Brain Lang.
Auditory vocabulary of the right hemisphere following brain bisection or hemidecortication
Cortex
Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasia profiles
Brain
Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study
Neurology
Open-label study of donepezil in chronic poststroke aphasia
Neurology
Functional MRI of phonological and semantic processing in temporal lobe epilepsy
Brain
Thalamic hypometabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke
Ann. Neurol.
Sur la faculte du langage articule
Paris Bull. Soc. Anthr,
Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI
Stroke
Functional MRI of language processing: dependence on input modality and temporal lobe epilepsy
Epilepsia
Acute reorganization of forepaw representation in the rat SI cortex after focal injury: neuroprotective effects of piracetam treatment
Euro. J. Neurosci.
Role of the non-dominant hemisphere in the restitution of speech in aphasia
Arciv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten
The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects
Brain
Schuell's stimulation approach to rehabilitation
Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Clin. Neuropharmacol
The cerebral basis of functional recovery
Language dominance in partial epilepsy patients identified with an fMRI reading task
Neurology
The riddle of the right hemisphere's contribution to the recovery of language
Euro. J. Discord Commun.
Potential effects of common drugs on stroke recovery
Arch.Neurol
Pharmacological approach to functional reorganization: the role of norepinephrine
Rev. Neurol. (Paris)
Should antihypertensive therapies be given to patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Drug Safety
Delineation of single-word semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia, with anatomical correlation
Ann. Neurol.
Differential capacity of left and right hemisphere areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia
Ann. Neurol.
Effects of separate treatments for distinct impairments within the naming process
Treatment of naming disorders: new issues regarding old therapies
J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.
Does the right make it right? Questions about recovery of language after stroke
Ann. Neurol.
Stages and mechanisms of recovery from aphasia
Jpn J. Neuropsychol.
Can shift to the right be a good thing? Ann
Neurol
For a theory of rehabilitation: progress in the decade of the brain
Cited by (54)
Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients
2021, CortexCitation Excerpt :Although this variation is expected to be higher at the lesion site, it is still present in the contra-lesional area. The identification of reduced T1 signal intensity in pOFC within the right hemisphere correlating with deficits in Factor 3 would suggest might play a role in these deficits, possibly through a process known as diaschisis (Marsh & Hillis, 2006; Price et al., 2010). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the successful implementation of PCA in limb apraxia using a detailed battery of tasks, which elicited three component factors: posture selection, semantic control and multi-demand sequencing.
Brain activity during spoken word recognition in subacute aphasia
2019, Brain and LanguageNeuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia – Insights into plasticity of the human language network
2019, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :The conflicting results between the few existing studies on the effects of donepezil to support language recovery point to the need of future studies on large collectives to identify the interaction between different pharmacological interventions and specific speech and language deficits and training protocols. Importantly, it should be noted that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil are usually not given in patients with normal cognitive functions but rather used for treatment of Alzheimer's Disease to slow deterioration of cognitive functions (see Marsh and Hillis, 2006). Nevertheless, short- and long-term safety and tolerability has been demonstrated in patients with post-stroke aphasia (see Berthier et al., 2011 or Llano and Small, 2016 for review) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may have positive effects on recovery during language rehabilitation (e.g. Berthier et al., 2003; Berthier et al., 2014; Goldstein, 1999, 2000).
A sensorimotor view of verbal working memory
2019, Cortex