Recovery from aphasia following brain injury: the role of reorganization

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57009-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Language is predominantly a left hemisphere function, yet patients with extensive damage to known language areas often recover quite well in the days to weeks to even years following focal brain injury. This recovery period can be divided into three overlapping stages: acute, subacute, and chronic, each with different underlying neural mechanisms. Reorganization of structure and function through the expression of neural plasticity plays a crucial role in recovery of language at least during the subacute phase of weeks to months after the occurrence of an injury. In this chapter we review the evidence for reorganization of language function after injury, the role it plays in the recovery of language following brain damage, and how knowledge of the mechanisms of recovery will allow design of more effective methods of rehabilitation.

Introduction

It is commonly accepted that language is predominantly a left hemisphere function, yet patients with extensive damage to the left hemisphere are often able to recover, at least somewhat, over the days to weeks to even years following their injury. Reorganization of structure/function of the nervous system in which an undamaged part of the brain takes over the function of the damaged portion has long been assumed to be a crucial component of the recovery process. In this chapter we review the evidence for such reorganization, the role it plays in the recovery of language following brain damage, and how knowledge of mechanisms of recovery can lead to more effective methods of rehabilitation.

To orient readers outside of the specialty of aphasiology, we should note that different areas of brain damage (or dysfunction) generally lead to different language disorders. While localization of language function is complex and controversial, a few widely agreed upon generalizations can be stated. Damage or dysfunction of the left posterior inferior frontal cortex (Broca's area) generally leads to impaired programming or planning of speech articulation, agrammatic speech, and difficulty in processing morphosyntactic processes for comprehension of syntactically complex sentences. Dysfunction of left temporal or parietal areas can disrupt representations of the meanings of words, and dysfunction of left posterior, superior temporal gyrus (Wernicke's area) disrupts the linkage between words and their meanings.

Section snippets

How does reorganization fit into recovery?

We have proposed that recovery of language after stroke occurs in three overlapping phases, each with a unique set of underlying neural mechanisms (Hillis and Breese, 2003; Hillis, 2005a). Acute recovery, which is primarily due to restoration of tissue function, occurs in the hours to days following brain damage. Subacute recovery, which is primarily due to neural reorganization, is a longer and more complex process. It follows the acute phase and lasts for several weeks to months during which

Evidence for reorganization in aphasia

We have known for over a century that, in normal, healthy individuals, language is predominantly represented in the left hemisphere (Broca, 1865). Bilateral activation during verb generation in normal individuals undergoing functional MRI (fMRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) indicates that it is not uncommon for the right hemisphere to also become engaged during language tasks (Demonet et al., 1992; Weiller et al., 1995; Noppeney et al., 2005). However, the left hemisphere is dominant

The location of reorganization — evidence from functional imaging

While it is clear that reorganization occurs, allowing at least partial recovery of language following injury, the areas that are responsible for assuming the lost function remain controversial. When fMRI and PET imaging became available, there was hope within the community that these techniques would reveal with certainty the areas that assume the language function for each damaged region of the brain. Unfortunately, results of numerous subsequent studies appear somewhat conflicting.

Many

Factors affecting the location and extent of reorganization

Many factors may influence the anatomical location where language processing occurs after damage to the left hemisphere. It is therefore difficult to predict the exact locations in the brain that will be essential for recovery in an individual patient. Several important factors will be discussed below.

Rehabilitation

The role of cognitive rehabilitation in stimulating reorganization of brain/language relationships is controversial. By better understanding what occurs in the brain during reorganization, we will undoubtedly be better able to design rehabilitation programs that facilitate the process. Many of the techniques currently employed by speech language pathologists and other clinicians focus on treatment of the damaged component of the system, while others focus on increasing the utilization of spared

Unanswered questions and areas of future research

It is currently an exciting era in the field of neurology. By better understanding the ways in which the brain recovers and is able to reorganize following injury, it is possible to begin designing better methods of treatment for our patients. There is accumulating evidence that rehabilitation can be effectively augmented with medications that increase synaptic plasticity. Nevertheless, many questions remain. There is a need for identification of all the factors that influence when and where in

References (97)

  • A. Kertesz et al.

    Computer tomographic localization, lesion size and prognosis in aphasia and nonverbal impairment

    Brain Lang

    (1979)
  • S. Knecht et al.

    How atypical is atypical language dominance?

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • J.L. McGaugh et al.

    Role of adrenal stress hormones in forming lasting memories in the brain

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2002)
  • M.A. Naeser et al.

    Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open protocol study

    Brain Lang

    (2005)
  • D. Perani et al.

    An fMRI study of word retrieval in aphasia

    Brain and Lang.

    (2003)
  • A. Raymer et al.

    Cognitive neuropsychological analysis and neuroanatomical correlates in a case of acute anomia

    Brain Lang

    (1997)
  • S.L. Small et al.

    Different neural circuits subserve reading before and after therapy for acquired dyslexia

    Brain Lang

    (1998)
  • D. Walker-Batson

    Use of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of aphasia

    Brain Lang.

    (2000)
  • E. Zaidel

    Auditory vocabulary of the right hemisphere following brain bisection or hemidecortication

    Cortex

    (1976)
  • M.P. Alexander et al.

    Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasia profiles

    Brain

    (1987)
  • P. Belin et al.

    Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study

    Neurology

    (1996)
  • M.L. Berthier et al.

    Open-label study of donepezil in chronic poststroke aphasia

    Neurology

    (2003)
  • R.L. Billingsley et al.

    Functional MRI of phonological and semantic processing in temporal lobe epilepsy

    Brain

    (2001)
  • F. Binkofski et al.

    Thalamic hypometabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1996)
  • P. Broca

    Sur la faculte du langage articule

    Paris Bull. Soc. Anthr,

    (1865)
  • Y. Cao et al.

    Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI

    Stroke

    (1999)
  • A. Carpentier et al.

    Functional MRI of language processing: dependence on input modality and temporal lobe epilepsy

    Epilepsia

    (2001)
  • J. Coq et al.

    Acute reorganization of forepaw representation in the rat SI cortex after focal injury: neuroprotective effects of piracetam treatment

    Euro. J. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • J. Czopf

    Role of the non-dominant hemisphere in the restitution of speech in aphasia

    Arciv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten

    (1972)
  • De Deyn, P.P., Reuck, J.D., Deberdt, W., Vlietinck, R., Orgogozo, J.M. and Members of the Piracetam in Acute Stroke...
  • J.F. Demonet et al.

    The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects

    Brain

    (1992)
  • R.J. Duffy et al.

    Schuell's stimulation approach to rehabilitation

  • P. Enderby et al.

    Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    Clin. Neuropharmacol

    (1994)
  • R.S. Frackowiak et al.

    The cerebral basis of functional recovery

  • W.D. Gaillard et al.

    Language dominance in partial epilepsy patients identified with an fMRI reading task

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • G. Gainotti

    The riddle of the right hemisphere's contribution to the recovery of language

    Euro. J. Discord Commun.

    (1993)
  • L.B. Goldstein

    Potential effects of common drugs on stroke recovery

    Arch.Neurol

    (1998)
  • L.B. Goldstein

    Pharmacological approach to functional reorganization: the role of norepinephrine

    Rev. Neurol. (Paris)

    (1999)
  • L.B. Goldstein

    Should antihypertensive therapies be given to patients with acute ischemic stroke?

    Drug Safety

    (2000)
  • Goldstein, L.B. and the Syngen in Acute Stroke Study Investigators (1995) Common drugs may influence motor recovery...
  • J. Hart et al.

    Delineation of single-word semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia, with anatomical correlation

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • W.D. Heiss et al.

    Differential capacity of left and right hemisphere areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1999)
  • A.E. Hillis

    Effects of separate treatments for distinct impairments within the naming process

  • A.E. Hillis

    Treatment of naming disorders: new issues regarding old therapies

    J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.

    (1998)
  • A.E. Hillis

    Does the right make it right? Questions about recovery of language after stroke

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2002)
  • A.E. Hillis

    Stages and mechanisms of recovery from aphasia

    Jpn J. Neuropsychol.

    (2005)
  • A.E. Hillis

    Can shift to the right be a good thing? Ann

    Neurol

    (2005)
  • A.E. Hillis

    For a theory of rehabilitation: progress in the decade of the brain

  • Cited by (54)

    • Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients

      2021, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although this variation is expected to be higher at the lesion site, it is still present in the contra-lesional area. The identification of reduced T1 signal intensity in pOFC within the right hemisphere correlating with deficits in Factor 3 would suggest might play a role in these deficits, possibly through a process known as diaschisis (Marsh & Hillis, 2006; Price et al., 2010). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the successful implementation of PCA in limb apraxia using a detailed battery of tasks, which elicited three component factors: posture selection, semantic control and multi-demand sequencing.

    • Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia – Insights into plasticity of the human language network

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The conflicting results between the few existing studies on the effects of donepezil to support language recovery point to the need of future studies on large collectives to identify the interaction between different pharmacological interventions and specific speech and language deficits and training protocols. Importantly, it should be noted that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil are usually not given in patients with normal cognitive functions but rather used for treatment of Alzheimer's Disease to slow deterioration of cognitive functions (see Marsh and Hillis, 2006). Nevertheless, short- and long-term safety and tolerability has been demonstrated in patients with post-stroke aphasia (see Berthier et al., 2011 or Llano and Small, 2016 for review) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may have positive effects on recovery during language rehabilitation (e.g. Berthier et al., 2003; Berthier et al., 2014; Goldstein, 1999, 2000).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text