Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 37, Issue 3, 1 March 1999, Pages 307-314
Neuropsychologia

Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00074-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Perceptual asymmetries under free-viewing conditions were investigated in 24 normal dextral adults. Three tasks were administered that required participants to chose between a pair of left/right reversed stimuli on the basis of their brightness, numerosity or size. These stimulus features were represented asymmetrically within the stimuli, so that each stimulus appeared darker, larger or more numerous on the left or right sides. Participants more often selected the stimulus with the relevant feature on the left-hand side for all three tasks. Response times for leftward responses were faster than rightward responses. Split-half reliabilities revealed a high level of consistency within the tasks. However, the correlation between tasks was low. These results suggest that the different tasks, while showing similar levels of perceptual asymmetry, engage distinct sets of lateralised processes.

Introduction

Cerebral asymmetries have traditionally been investigated in non-clinical populations using presentation methods that direct stimuli unilaterally to the left or right hemispheres (LH and RH, respectively). Within the visual modality, stimuli are usually presented briefly to the left or right of a central fixation point. This mode of presentation is thought to provide unilateral hemispheric presentation because each visual hemifield projects to the contralateral hemisphere. A right visual field (hence LH) advantage has consistently been reported for verbal tasks such as word recognition (e.g. Ref. [23]) whereas a left visual field (hence RH) advantage has been reported for spatial tasks such as face recognition (e.g. Ref. [3]). A number of studies have demonstrated that perceptual asymmetries also emerge under free-viewing conditions that do not constrain stimulus input to a single hemisphere. In these studies, participants are typically allowed to view the entire stimulus for as long as they require. Research with chimeric facial stimuli with happy/neutral expressions has demonstrated that participants tend to base their judgements of emotion on the leftward features of the face 16, 21. This leftward bias can be affected by the emotional valence of the face [26]and by the hand preference of the observer [11]. Perceptual asymmetries have also been observed for line bisection. In contrast to patients with RH damage and left neglect, who bisect horizontal lines to the right of centre [17], non-clinical participants bisect the line slightly to the left of its true centre 1, 18; though this bias has not been observed by all researchers 26, 31. The inconsistent results observed for line bisection may be related to the hand that is used to bisect the line 2, 29. While line bisection and chimeric facial recognition tasks are relatively well established within the literature, a number of novel tasks have also produced perceptual asymmetries under free-viewing conditions. One such task, employed by Mattingley et al. [16], required the comparison of two left/right mirror-reversed brightness gradients or greyscales. Each greyscale changed incrementally from white on one side to black on the other. When asked to determine which stimulus was overall darker, participants tended to choose the greyscale that was dark on the left-hand side. This bias occurred despite the fact that both greyscales were overall equally dark. Similar results have been reported by Luh et al. [13]and Luh [12]for a dot enumeration task. The stimuli used in this task consisted of two left/right mirror-reversed arrays of dots. The dots were arranged so that they were more dense at the left end of one array and at the right end of the other array. When asked to pick the stimulus which contained more dots, participants chose the stimulus with a higher density of dots on the left-hand side. Mattingley et al. [16]and Luh [12]suggested that these perceptual asymmetries were the result of an attentional or perceptual bias directed to the left hemispace. These biases are thought to occur following the selective activation of the RH through the act or the expectancy of spatial processing [10]. Indeed, left neglect patients with RH damage consistently show strong asymmetries in the opposite direction in chimeric (composite) face-processing tasks, even after resolution of all other clinical symptoms [15]. The general aim of the present study was to replicate and investigate various aspects of the perceptual asymmetries observed for judgements of brightness and numerosity. Mattingley et al. [16]and Luh [12]both used cards and manual presentation techniques to present their stimuli. In the present study, a computer was used to generate the stimuli and to record the responses. Three tasks were administered to each participant. The greyscales task required participants to make a relative judgement of the brightness of two luminance gradients. The gradients were arranged so that one stimulus was darker on the left side while the other was darker on the right side [see Fig. 1 (a)]. It was anticipated that, in line with the results obtained by Mattingley et al. [16], participants would tend to choose the stimulus with the relevant feature on the left-hand side. The stars task required a judgment of numerosity. In this case, a set number of stars were placed in two horizontal bars. The stars were arranged so that they were more dense on the left side in one stimulus and on the right side in the other stimulus [see Fig. 1 (b)]. In line with the results of Luh et al. [13]and Luh [12]it was predicted that participants would tend to pick the stimulus with the relevant feature on the left-hand side. Judgements of brightness and numerosity are both thought to involve the operation of RH mechanisms 4, 19. The third task sought to determine whether the leftward bias for judgements of brightness and numerosity extended to the judgement of size, which is also thought to involve RH mechanisms [6]. The shape task required a judgement of the relative size of two stimuli. The stimuli increased in height from one side to the other and were arranged so that one stimulus was higher on the left side while the other was higher on the right [see Fig. 1 (c)]. If asymmetries for the judgement of brightness and numerosity extend to judgements of size, a leftward bias should emerge for the shape task. Participants were required to make a forced-choice discrimination between the upper and lower stimuli. Mattingley et al. [16]and Luh [12]required participants to select the stimulus that had more of a particular feature. In the present study, half of the participants were required to select the stimulus that had more of a feature. Thus, for the greyscales, shape and star tasks, participants were required to select the stimulus that was darker, larger or contained more stars (respectively). To determine whether the leftward bias extended to judgements of less, the questions were reversed for the remaining participants. In this case, participants were required to determine which stimulus was lighter, smaller or had less stars for the greyscales, shape and stars tasks (respectively). The studies conducted by Mattingley et al. [16]and Luh [12]both required participants to make a verbal response to the stimuli. This mode of response is not ideal because it involves the unilateral operation of LH mechanisms. This activation may have weakened the leftward bias through pre-motor activation [2]or general activation within the LH [20]. Activation of the LH may account for the relatively weak and less reliable leftward bias reported by Luh et al. [13]for the dot enumeration task. The effects of unilateral activation were eliminated in the present study through the use of a bimanual response (using both middle fingers to select the upper stimulus and both index fingers to select the lower stimulus). Performance was measured with response bias and reaction time (RT) measures. Previous work in this field 18, 32has demonstrated that RT combined with measures of response bias provides a useful insight into perceptual asymmetries. The final aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the degree of asymmetry shown for the different tasks. Luh [12]found a consistent leftward bias for a variety of line bisection, face perception and dot enumerations tasks. Examination of the correlation between the tests revealed that the asymmetries exhibited for the tasks were independent of one another. Similar results have been reported by Mattingley et al. [16]. They found a significant leftward bias for chimeric facial and greyscales stimuli, but no significant relation between the biases shown for the tasks. Mattingley et al. [16]and Luh [12]suggested that the weak correlation observed between tasks reflected the operation of task-specific processes that have different patterns of lateralisation. However, it is also possible that the low correlations are the result of poor intra-test reliability. Manning et al. [14]have demonstrated considerable within and between-participant variability for a line bisection task which they attributed to different scanning strategies. The present study investigated the contribution of task specific processes to perceptual asymmetries by examining inter- and intra-task association. Intra-task reliability was examined using split-half correlations whereas inter-task association was gauged by correlating individual asymmetry scores between the tasks. A high level of intra-task reliability combined with a low level of inter-task association would suggest that the tasks were reliable, but tapped different lateralised processes.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty-four (male=8, female=16) first year psychology students participated in this study as part of their course requirements. All participants were naive as to the aims and expected outcomes of the study. The modal age of participants was 18 years. All participants were right-handed as defined by Olfields [24]handedness inventory and reported to have normal, or corrected-to-normal visual acuity.

Apparatus

The experiment was controlled by an IBM clone interfaced with a digital input/output card with an

Response bias

Participants responses were categorised according to whether they selected the stimulus with the salient feature on the left or right side irrespective of whether it was the upper or lower stimulus. Thus, for the greyscales task, when participants were told to select the darker stimulus, selection of the stimulus that was darker on the left was categorised as a leftward response irrespective of whether it was the upper or lower stimulus. Response bias was measured by subtracting leftward

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrate a clear leftward bias for the greyscales, shape and stars tasks. On average, participants selected the stimulus with the salient feature on the left side 68% of the time. The response bias was accompanied by significantly faster RTs for leftward responses. This RT asymmetry suggests that participants were more certain of their decision when they selected the stimulus with the salient feature on the left-hand side. The leftward bias occurred for all

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper and Ian Robertson for carrying out the experiments.

References (32)

  • J-L Bradshaw et al.

    Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection? Neuropsychologia

    (1987)
  • E-E Brodie

    Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia

    (1996)
  • M-J Hoptman

    Perceptual asymmetries in left- and right-handers for cartoons and real faces. Brain and Cognition

    (1988)
  • K-E Luh et al.

    Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain and Cognition

    (1991)
  • J-B Mattingley et al.

    Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?. Neuropsychologia

    (1994)
  • J McGlone

    The relation between cerebral speech laterality and spatial ability with special reference to sex and hand preference. Neuropsychologia

    (1973)
  • C-R Moreno et al.

    Lateralisation for the expression and perception of facial emotion as a function of age. Neuropsychologia

    (1990)
  • P Nichelli et al.

    Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition

    (1989)
  • M-E-R Nicholls

    A failure to produce a left hemisphere advantage through verbal priming. Neuropsychologia

    (1996)
  • T Palmer

    Cerebral asymmetry in visual attention. Brain and Cognition

    (1990)
  • P-A Reuter-Lorenz

    Differential contribution of the two hemispheres to the perception of happy and sad faces. Neuropsychologia

    (1981)
  • E Sampaio

    Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers. Neuropsychologia

    (1992)
  • B-B Schiff

    Effect of unilateral contraction of hand muscles on perceiver biases in the perception of chimeric and neutral faces. Neuropsychologia

    (1993)
  • R Werth

    Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in a line bisection task. Neuropsychologia

    (1988)
  • A Wirsen et al.

    Differences in asymmetric perception of facial expression in free-vision chimeric stimuli and reaction time. Brain and Cognition

    (1990)
  • Cohen-Levine S, Banich MT, Primeau M. Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity? Brain and...
  • Cited by (215)

    • Accident proneness, laterality, and time estimation

      2023, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    • Leftward biases in poke bowl plating aesthetics

      2023, International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text