Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(70)80038-5Get rights and content

A scoring system for gestational age, based on 10 neurologic and 11 “external” criteria, has been applied to 167 newborn infants. The “external” score gave a better correlation with gestation than did the neurologic score, but the combined total score was better than either alone. The correlation coefficient for the total score against gestation was 0.93. The error of prediction of a single score was 1.02 weeks and of the average of two independent assessments was 0.7 weeks. The method gives consistent results within the first 5 days and is equally reliable in the first 24 hours of life. This scoring system is more objective and reproducible than trying to guess gestational age on the presence or absence of individual signs.

References (7)

  • KoenigsbergerM.R.

    Judgment of fetal age. I. Neurologic evaluation

    Pediat. Clin. N. Amer.

    (1966)
  • Saint-Anne DargassiesS.

    La maturation neurologique du prématuré

    Et. Neonat.

    (1955)
  • Amiel-TisonC.

    Neurological evaluation of the maturity of newborn infants

    Arch. Dis. Child.

    (1968)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2041)

  • Altered Gray Matter Cortical and Subcortical T1-Weighted/T2-Weighted Ratio in Premature-Born Adults

    2023, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gestational age (GA) was estimated from maternal reports on the first day of the last menstrual period and serial ultrasound scans during pregnancy. In cases in which the two measures differed by more than 2 weeks, clinical assessment at birth with the Dubowitz method was applied (38). BW and intensity of neonatal treatment index (INTI), quantifying duration and intensity of medical treatment after birth, were obtained from obstetric records (34,39).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented in part at the Twelfth International Congress of Pediatrics, Mexico City, December, 1968, and at the Fifteenth Meeting of the Paediatric Research Society, Sheffield, March, 1969.

*

Recipient of a research grant from the Endowment Fund of the United Sheffield Hospitals.

**

Address: Dr. V. Dubowitz, Department of Child Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield 10, England.

View full text